Validation of the Scale of Perceived Overqualification Among Nurses: A Cross-Sectional Study.

IF 1 Q4 NURSING
Ivana Žilić, Sandra Bošković, Dijana Filipović, Danko Relić, Tihana Gašpert
{"title":"Validation of the Scale of Perceived Overqualification Among Nurses: A Cross-Sectional Study.","authors":"Ivana Žilić, Sandra Bošković, Dijana Filipović, Danko Relić, Tihana Gašpert","doi":"10.1891/JNM-2026-0017","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background and Purpose:</b> Perceived overqualification refers to the perception that one's education, skills, and competencies exceed job requirements. Although widely examined internationally, no validated instrument has been available to assess this construct among nurses in Croatia. The purpose of this study was to validate the Croatian version of the Scale of Perceived Overqualification (SPOQ) and examine its associations with selected job-related outcomes. <b>Methods:</b> A cross-sectional online survey was conducted among 90 registered nurses in Croatia. The SPOQ was translated using a double back-translation procedure. Internal consistency was assessed using coefficient alpha, and construct validity was examined using confirmatory factor analysis, comparing one- and two-factor models. Associations between SPOQ scores, job satisfaction, ambition alignment, and turnover intentions were analyzed using correlation and regression analyses. <b>Results:</b> The Croatian SPOQ demonstrated good internal consistency (coefficient alpha = .830). Confirmatory factor analysis supported a two-factor structure distinguishing perceived underutilization of skills from perceived educational/experiential mismatch. Higher perceived overqualification was significantly associated with lower job satisfaction, ambition alignment, and higher turnover intentions. Perceived underutilization emerged as the stronger predictor of job-related outcomes. <b>Conclusions:</b> The findings support the reliability and construct validity of the Croatian SPOQ and confirm its relevance for nursing workforce research. The distinction between underutilization and formal mismatch provides additional insights into the mechanisms linking overqualification with dissatisfaction and turnover intentions.</p>","PeriodicalId":16585,"journal":{"name":"Journal of nursing measurement","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of nursing measurement","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1891/JNM-2026-0017","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and Purpose: Perceived overqualification refers to the perception that one's education, skills, and competencies exceed job requirements. Although widely examined internationally, no validated instrument has been available to assess this construct among nurses in Croatia. The purpose of this study was to validate the Croatian version of the Scale of Perceived Overqualification (SPOQ) and examine its associations with selected job-related outcomes. Methods: A cross-sectional online survey was conducted among 90 registered nurses in Croatia. The SPOQ was translated using a double back-translation procedure. Internal consistency was assessed using coefficient alpha, and construct validity was examined using confirmatory factor analysis, comparing one- and two-factor models. Associations between SPOQ scores, job satisfaction, ambition alignment, and turnover intentions were analyzed using correlation and regression analyses. Results: The Croatian SPOQ demonstrated good internal consistency (coefficient alpha = .830). Confirmatory factor analysis supported a two-factor structure distinguishing perceived underutilization of skills from perceived educational/experiential mismatch. Higher perceived overqualification was significantly associated with lower job satisfaction, ambition alignment, and higher turnover intentions. Perceived underutilization emerged as the stronger predictor of job-related outcomes. Conclusions: The findings support the reliability and construct validity of the Croatian SPOQ and confirm its relevance for nursing workforce research. The distinction between underutilization and formal mismatch provides additional insights into the mechanisms linking overqualification with dissatisfaction and turnover intentions.

护士感知资格过高量表的验证:一项横断面研究。
背景和目的:“资历过高”指的是认为自己的教育、技能和能力超出了工作要求。虽然在国际上进行了广泛的检查,但没有有效的工具可用于评估克罗地亚护士的这种结构。本研究的目的是验证克罗地亚版本的感知资格过高量表(SPOQ),并检查其与选定的工作相关结果的关联。方法:对克罗地亚90名注册护士进行横断面在线调查。SPOQ使用双重反翻译程序进行翻译。使用alpha系数评估内部一致性,并使用验证性因子分析检验结构效度,比较单因素模型和双因素模型。运用相关分析和回归分析分析了SPOQ得分、工作满意度、抱负一致性和离职意向之间的关系。结果:克罗地亚语SPOQ具有良好的内部一致性(alpha系数= .830)。验证性因子分析支持一种双因素结构,将感知到的技能利用不足与感知到的教育/经验不匹配区分开来。较高的学历过高感知与较低的工作满意度、抱负一致性和较高的离职意向显著相关。感知到的未充分利用成为工作相关结果的更强预测因子。结论:研究结果支持克罗地亚SPOQ的信度和结构效度,并证实其与护理人力研究的相关性。未充分利用和正式不匹配之间的区别提供了对将资格过高与不满和离职意图联系起来的机制的额外见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
53
期刊介绍: The Journal of Nursing Measurement specifically addresses instrumentation in nursing. It serves as a prime forum for disseminating information on instruments, tools, approaches, and procedures developed or utilized for measuring variables in nursing research, practice, and education. Particular emphasis is placed on evidence for the reliability and validity or sensitivity and specificity of such instruments. The journal includes innovative discussions of theories, principles, practices, and issues relevant to nursing measurement.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书