Cross-publisher agreement on the defining principles of plain language summaries of publications (PLSPs).

IF 2.8 4区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Current Medical Research and Opinion Pub Date : 2026-06-01 Epub Date: 2026-07-16 DOI:10.1080/03007995.2026.2700975
Sophie Nobes, Kelly Soldavin, Rachel Jenkins, Hamish McDougall, Joanne Walker, Laura Dormer, Vicky Sanders
{"title":"Cross-publisher agreement on the defining principles of plain language summaries of publications (PLSPs).","authors":"Sophie Nobes, Kelly Soldavin, Rachel Jenkins, Hamish McDougall, Joanne Walker, Laura Dormer, Vicky Sanders","doi":"10.1080/03007995.2026.2700975","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Introduced in 2020, plain language summaries of publications (PLSPs) are standalone articles that aim to expand the reach of scientific findings to non-specialist audiences using plain language and meaningful visuals. Despite increased publication, there is no agreed cross-publisher definition of PLSPs, resulting in inconsistent terminology, formatting, peer-review processes, and metadata that hinder indexing and discoverability in bibliographic databases such as PubMed and Europe PMC. In February 2024, the multistakeholder collaboration Open Pharma launched an initiative to review existing standards and practices related to the publication of PLSPs. After identifying three publishers offering standalone PLSPs - Becaris Publishing, Sage, and Taylor & Francis - representatives from each formed a steering committee to define PLSPs and agree on principles that differentiate them from other publishing formats. PLSPs are defined as standalone summaries of peer-reviewed articles, written according to plain language principles, published open access with a unique digital object identifier (DOI), and are themselves peer reviewed (including by someone who is not a scientific specialist in the topic area). They should include a summary, clear reference to the original article, and a combination of text and meaningful graphics. This consensus provides a foundation for standardizing PLSPs as a distinct article type and acceptable secondary publication format. We hope it will also support consistent authoring, editorial management, peer-review processes and indexing. We call on indexing services to formally recognize PLSPs and on publishers to adopt this format as an accurate and reliable source of understandable scientific information.</p>","PeriodicalId":10814,"journal":{"name":"Current Medical Research and Opinion","volume":" ","pages":"1269-1273"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Medical Research and Opinion","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/03007995.2026.2700975","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/7/16 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduced in 2020, plain language summaries of publications (PLSPs) are standalone articles that aim to expand the reach of scientific findings to non-specialist audiences using plain language and meaningful visuals. Despite increased publication, there is no agreed cross-publisher definition of PLSPs, resulting in inconsistent terminology, formatting, peer-review processes, and metadata that hinder indexing and discoverability in bibliographic databases such as PubMed and Europe PMC. In February 2024, the multistakeholder collaboration Open Pharma launched an initiative to review existing standards and practices related to the publication of PLSPs. After identifying three publishers offering standalone PLSPs - Becaris Publishing, Sage, and Taylor & Francis - representatives from each formed a steering committee to define PLSPs and agree on principles that differentiate them from other publishing formats. PLSPs are defined as standalone summaries of peer-reviewed articles, written according to plain language principles, published open access with a unique digital object identifier (DOI), and are themselves peer reviewed (including by someone who is not a scientific specialist in the topic area). They should include a summary, clear reference to the original article, and a combination of text and meaningful graphics. This consensus provides a foundation for standardizing PLSPs as a distinct article type and acceptable secondary publication format. We hope it will also support consistent authoring, editorial management, peer-review processes and indexing. We call on indexing services to formally recognize PLSPs and on publishers to adopt this format as an accurate and reliable source of understandable scientific information.

跨出版商就出版物的简单语言摘要(PLSPs)的定义原则达成一致。
通俗语言出版物摘要(plsp)于2020年推出,是一种独立的文章,旨在使用通俗语言和有意义的视觉效果将科学发现的影响范围扩大到非专业受众。尽管出版物增加了,但plsp的跨出版商定义没有达成一致,导致术语、格式、同行评审过程和元数据不一致,阻碍了PubMed和Europe PMC等书目数据库的索引和发现性。2024年2月,多利益相关者合作组织Open Pharma发起了一项倡议,审查与plsp出版相关的现有标准和实践。在确定了三家提供独立plsp的出版商——Becaris Publishing、Sage和Taylor & Francis——之后,每家出版商的代表组成了一个指导委员会来定义plsp,并就区别于其他出版格式的原则达成一致。plsp被定义为同行评议文章的独立摘要,根据简单的语言原则编写,以唯一的数字对象标识符(DOI)开放获取发布,并且本身也经过同行评议(包括由非主题领域的科学专家进行评议)。它们应该包括摘要,对原始文章的明确参考,以及文本和有意义的图形的组合。这一共识为标准化plsp作为一种独特的文章类型和可接受的二级出版格式提供了基础。我们希望它还能支持一致的创作、编辑管理、同行评议过程和索引。我们呼吁索引服务正式承认plsp,并呼吁出版商采用这种格式作为可理解的科学信息的准确和可靠来源。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Current Medical Research and Opinion
Current Medical Research and Opinion 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
4.30%
发文量
247
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Current Medical Research and Opinion is a MEDLINE-indexed, peer-reviewed, international journal for the rapid publication of original research on new and existing drugs and therapies, Phase II-IV studies, and post-marketing investigations. Equivalence, safety and efficacy/effectiveness studies are especially encouraged. Preclinical, Phase I, pharmacoeconomic, outcomes and quality of life studies may also be considered if there is clear clinical relevance
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书