Olfactory Function in Autism Spectrum Disorder Across the Lifespan: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

IF 5.7 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL
Autism Pub Date : 2026-09-01 Epub Date: 2026-07-15 DOI:10.1177/13623613261462975
Isabelle Cullen, Elisa Dal Bò, Peace Maddox, Thomas Sophocles, Kristina McShea, Edward S Brodkin, Valentina Parma
{"title":"Olfactory Function in Autism Spectrum Disorder Across the Lifespan: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.","authors":"Isabelle Cullen, Elisa Dal Bò, Peace Maddox, Thomas Sophocles, Kristina McShea, Edward S Brodkin, Valentina Parma","doi":"10.1177/13623613261462975","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Altered sensory processing is recognized as a core diagnostic feature of autism spectrum disorder (ASD). Olfactory perception in autism remains poorly characterized, despite its important role in safety, nutrition, and socialization. We conducted a preregistered systematic review and meta-analysis to quantify differences and identify moderators in olfactory function between autistic and non-autistic individuals. Following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, we searched Web of Science, SCOPUS, PubMed, EMBASE, and CINAHL databases and identified 46 eligible studies with 87 effect sizes from 1,580 autistic and 7,698 non-autistic individuals. Moderator analyses examined olfactory assessment type, olfactory function tested, age, sex, and intelligence quotient (IQ). Autistic individuals showed significantly poorer olfactory performance than non-autistic (<i>g</i> = -0.64), with reduced performance in psychophysical testing (<i>g</i> = -0.58) and informant reports (<i>g</i> = -1.31), but not in self-report or odor rating measures. In autism, significant differences were observed for psychophysically measured odor identification (<i>g</i> = -0.66), threshold (<i>g</i> = -0.47), and taste-smell measures from informant reports (<i>g</i> = -1.33). Autistic children exhibited moderate deficits (<i>g</i> = -0.88; odor identification: <i>g</i> = -0.80; threshold: <i>g</i> = -0.65). Olfactory alterations in autism appear most pronounced in childhood and vary by assessment method and olfactory function measured. Our results highlight the need for age-appropriate standardized measures to accurately evaluate sensory function in autism across the lifespan.Lay AbstractMany autistic individuals experience sensory sensitivities that can make everyday activities more difficult. While researchers have studied how autism affects senses like sight and sound, the sense of smell has received much less attention, even though it plays important roles in helping us detect danger, judge whether food is safe to eat, and connect with others socially. Past studies have suggested that autistic individuals may experience differences in their sense of smell, including how well they can detect, distinguish, or identify odors by name. However, the results of smell studies in autism have been mixed because studies often use different testing methods, have small numbers of participants, and do not always account for demographic factors (e.g., age or sex). In this study, we reviewed the published research literature to better understand how the sense of smell differs based on: (1) whether someone is autistic or not, (2) the type of smell test used, (3) age (children vs. adults), and (4) the specific smell ability being measured. Overall, we found that autistic individuals tend to have poorer smell abilities than non-autistic individuals. These differences between autistic and non-autistic individuals were most noticeable when smell was measured by caregiver reports or standardized laboratory tests, but not when people rated their own sense of smell or described how odors smelled to them. These differences in smell were mainly seen in autistic children. The strongest differences were found in odor identification, sensitivity to smells, and caregiver-reported taste and smell experiences.</p>","PeriodicalId":8724,"journal":{"name":"Autism","volume":" ","pages":"2225-2247"},"PeriodicalIF":5.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Autism","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/13623613261462975","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/7/15 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Altered sensory processing is recognized as a core diagnostic feature of autism spectrum disorder (ASD). Olfactory perception in autism remains poorly characterized, despite its important role in safety, nutrition, and socialization. We conducted a preregistered systematic review and meta-analysis to quantify differences and identify moderators in olfactory function between autistic and non-autistic individuals. Following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, we searched Web of Science, SCOPUS, PubMed, EMBASE, and CINAHL databases and identified 46 eligible studies with 87 effect sizes from 1,580 autistic and 7,698 non-autistic individuals. Moderator analyses examined olfactory assessment type, olfactory function tested, age, sex, and intelligence quotient (IQ). Autistic individuals showed significantly poorer olfactory performance than non-autistic (g = -0.64), with reduced performance in psychophysical testing (g = -0.58) and informant reports (g = -1.31), but not in self-report or odor rating measures. In autism, significant differences were observed for psychophysically measured odor identification (g = -0.66), threshold (g = -0.47), and taste-smell measures from informant reports (g = -1.33). Autistic children exhibited moderate deficits (g = -0.88; odor identification: g = -0.80; threshold: g = -0.65). Olfactory alterations in autism appear most pronounced in childhood and vary by assessment method and olfactory function measured. Our results highlight the need for age-appropriate standardized measures to accurately evaluate sensory function in autism across the lifespan.Lay AbstractMany autistic individuals experience sensory sensitivities that can make everyday activities more difficult. While researchers have studied how autism affects senses like sight and sound, the sense of smell has received much less attention, even though it plays important roles in helping us detect danger, judge whether food is safe to eat, and connect with others socially. Past studies have suggested that autistic individuals may experience differences in their sense of smell, including how well they can detect, distinguish, or identify odors by name. However, the results of smell studies in autism have been mixed because studies often use different testing methods, have small numbers of participants, and do not always account for demographic factors (e.g., age or sex). In this study, we reviewed the published research literature to better understand how the sense of smell differs based on: (1) whether someone is autistic or not, (2) the type of smell test used, (3) age (children vs. adults), and (4) the specific smell ability being measured. Overall, we found that autistic individuals tend to have poorer smell abilities than non-autistic individuals. These differences between autistic and non-autistic individuals were most noticeable when smell was measured by caregiver reports or standardized laboratory tests, but not when people rated their own sense of smell or described how odors smelled to them. These differences in smell were mainly seen in autistic children. The strongest differences were found in odor identification, sensitivity to smells, and caregiver-reported taste and smell experiences.

自闭症谱系障碍的嗅觉功能:一项系统回顾和荟萃分析。
感觉加工改变被认为是自闭症谱系障碍(ASD)的核心诊断特征。尽管嗅觉感知在安全、营养和社会化方面发挥着重要作用,但自闭症患者的嗅觉感知特征仍然很差。我们进行了一项预注册的系统回顾和荟萃分析,以量化自闭症和非自闭症个体之间嗅觉功能的差异并确定调节因素。根据系统评价和荟萃分析的首选报告项目(PRISMA)指南,我们检索了Web of Science、SCOPUS、PubMed、EMBASE和CINAHL数据库,从1,580名自闭症患者和7,698名非自闭症患者中确定了46项符合条件的研究,有87个效应量。调节分析检查了嗅觉评估类型,嗅觉功能测试,年龄,性别和智商(IQ)。自闭症个体的嗅觉表现明显低于非自闭症个体(g = -0.64),在心理物理测试(g = -0.58)和告密者报告(g = -1.31)中的表现也有所下降,但在自我报告或气味评级测量中没有表现出来。在自闭症中,观察到心理物理测量的气味识别(g = -0.66),阈值(g = -0.47)和来自告密者报告的味觉-嗅觉测量(g = -1.33)存在显著差异。自闭症儿童表现出中度缺陷(g = -0.88;气味识别:g = -0.80;阈值:g = -0.65)。自闭症患者的嗅觉改变在儿童时期最为明显,且因评估方法和嗅觉功能测量而异。我们的研究结果强调,需要采用适合年龄的标准化措施来准确评估自闭症患者在整个生命周期中的感觉功能。许多自闭症患者都有感觉敏感性,这使得日常活动更加困难。虽然研究人员已经研究了自闭症是如何影响视觉和听觉等感官的,但嗅觉受到的关注要少得多,尽管它在帮助我们发现危险、判断食物是否安全、以及与他人建立社交联系方面发挥着重要作用。过去的研究表明,自闭症患者可能在嗅觉方面存在差异,包括他们通过名字检测、区分或识别气味的能力。然而,自闭症嗅觉研究的结果好坏参半,因为研究通常使用不同的测试方法,参与者人数很少,而且并不总是考虑人口因素(例如年龄或性别)。在这项研究中,我们回顾了已发表的研究文献,以更好地了解嗅觉在以下方面的差异:(1)某人是否患有自闭症,(2)使用的嗅觉测试类型,(3)年龄(儿童与成人),以及(4)被测量的特定嗅觉能力。总的来说,我们发现自闭症患者的嗅觉能力往往比非自闭症患者差。自闭症患者和非自闭症患者之间的这些差异在通过护理人员报告或标准化实验室测试来测量嗅觉时最为明显,但在人们评估自己的嗅觉或描述气味对他们的影响时却不是这样。这些嗅觉上的差异主要出现在自闭症儿童身上。最大的差异是在气味识别、对气味的敏感性和照顾者报告的味觉和嗅觉体验方面。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Autism
Autism PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL-
CiteScore
9.80
自引率
11.50%
发文量
160
期刊介绍: Autism is a major, peer-reviewed, international journal, published 8 times a year, publishing research of direct and practical relevance to help improve the quality of life for individuals with autism or autism-related disorders. It is interdisciplinary in nature, focusing on research in many areas, including: intervention; diagnosis; training; education; translational issues related to neuroscience, medical and genetic issues of practical import; psychological processes; evaluation of particular therapies; quality of life; family needs; and epidemiological research. Autism provides a major international forum for peer-reviewed research of direct and practical relevance to improving the quality of life for individuals with autism or autism-related disorders. The journal''s success and popularity reflect the recent worldwide growth in the research and understanding of autistic spectrum disorders, and the consequent impact on the provision of treatment and care. Autism is interdisciplinary in nature, focusing on evaluative research in all areas, including: intervention, diagnosis, training, education, neuroscience, psychological processes, evaluation of particular therapies, quality of life issues, family issues and family services, medical and genetic issues, epidemiological research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书