The complexities of comprehensive exams in epidemiology.

IF 4.1 2区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Hailey R Banack, Jay S Kaufman, Jacqueline E McLaughlin, Michael B Jarstfer, Lynne C Messer, Matthew P Fox
{"title":"The complexities of comprehensive exams in epidemiology.","authors":"Hailey R Banack, Jay S Kaufman, Jacqueline E McLaughlin, Michael B Jarstfer, Lynne C Messer, Matthew P Fox","doi":"10.1093/aje/kwag158","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Comprehensive exams are a standard component of doctoral-level training programs in epidemiology. In this manuscript, we describe current practices in the administration of comprehensive examinations across doctoral programs in epidemiology and discuss variation in the content, format, and structure of these exams. We present results from a survey of 33 epidemiology programs about the comprehensive exam process. We also discuss a symposium focused on comprehensive exams that was part of the 2025 Society for Epidemiologic Research annual meeting. The symposium included speakers with specific expertise in designing comprehensive exams, as well as faculty from several different epidemiology programs across North America. The survey found important differences in format (ie, written, oral, general epidemiology, substantive topics), when the exams are administered, and the level of epidemiology knowledge targeted. In this manuscript, we also discuss common challenges programs face, including developing and grading exams. By sharing this information with a wide audience of epidemiologists, we aim to facilitate discussion to improve the comprehensive exam process for doctoral students in our field. This work also fits with a broader goal to initiate discussion about doctoral-level training in epidemiology.</p>","PeriodicalId":7472,"journal":{"name":"American journal of epidemiology","volume":" ","pages":"2616-2621"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13642361/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of epidemiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/aje/kwag158","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Comprehensive exams are a standard component of doctoral-level training programs in epidemiology. In this manuscript, we describe current practices in the administration of comprehensive examinations across doctoral programs in epidemiology and discuss variation in the content, format, and structure of these exams. We present results from a survey of 33 epidemiology programs about the comprehensive exam process. We also discuss a symposium focused on comprehensive exams that was part of the 2025 Society for Epidemiologic Research annual meeting. The symposium included speakers with specific expertise in designing comprehensive exams, as well as faculty from several different epidemiology programs across North America. The survey found important differences in format (ie, written, oral, general epidemiology, substantive topics), when the exams are administered, and the level of epidemiology knowledge targeted. In this manuscript, we also discuss common challenges programs face, including developing and grading exams. By sharing this information with a wide audience of epidemiologists, we aim to facilitate discussion to improve the comprehensive exam process for doctoral students in our field. This work also fits with a broader goal to initiate discussion about doctoral-level training in epidemiology.

流行病学综合考试的复杂性。
综合考试是流行病学博士水平培训项目的标准组成部分。在这篇论文中,我们描述了目前流行病学博士课程综合考试管理的实践,并讨论了这些考试的内容、格式和结构的变化。我们介绍了一项关于33个不同流行病学项目的综合考试过程的调查结果。我们还讨论了一个关于综合考试的研讨会,这是2025年流行病学研究学会年会的一部分。研讨会包括了在设计综合考试方面具有专门知识的演讲者以及来自北美几个不同流行病学项目的教师。调查发现,在考试形式(即笔试、口试、普通流行病学、实质性题目)、考试时间以及考试所针对的流行病学知识水平等方面存在重大差异。在本文中,我们还讨论了课程面临的常见挑战,包括创建和评分考试。通过与广大流行病学家分享这些信息,我们的目标是促进讨论,以改善我们领域博士生的综合考试过程。这项工作也符合更广泛的目标,即开始讨论流行病学博士水平的培训。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
American journal of epidemiology
American journal of epidemiology 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
4.00%
发文量
221
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Epidemiology is the oldest and one of the premier epidemiologic journals devoted to the publication of empirical research findings, opinion pieces, and methodological developments in the field of epidemiologic research. It is a peer-reviewed journal aimed at both fellow epidemiologists and those who use epidemiologic data, including public health workers and clinicians.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书