Lei Zhang, Xiaodiao Dai, Lei Zhang, Ruikang Song, Haocheng Zhao, Bei Wang, Yongping Liang, Junfeng Ren, Shizhe Gao
{"title":"The improvement effect and mechanism of surfactants on the fluidity of coal tar","authors":"Lei Zhang, Xiaodiao Dai, Lei Zhang, Ruikang Song, Haocheng Zhao, Bei Wang, Yongping Liang, Junfeng Ren, Shizhe Gao","doi":"10.1016/j.cherd.2026.06.027","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>During in-situ underground coal pyrolysis, the tar generated ascends from the high-temperature zone toward the surface and cools naturally. This cooling induces a sharp viscosity increase that blocks the extraction channel, impeding engineering implementation. To address this obstruction, this study systematically evaluates the viscosity-reduction performance of five chemical agents—sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS), sodium dodecyl benzene sulfonate (SDBS), anhydrous betaine (BA), polyvinyl alcohol (PVA), and Tween 80—at 30 °C, simulating extraction conditions. Reduction ratios are measured across 1–9 wt% dosage. Contact angle, surface tension, and polarized-light microscopy reveal the underlying mechanisms. Results identify BA as the optimal agent, delivering a maximum viscosity reduction of 34.13% at 5 wt% dosage, representing a 2.2-fold improvement over simple water dilution (15.73%). This value is comparable to the ∼30% reduction reported for heavy oils using similar nonionic surfactants. Its superior performance originates from a marked decrease in oil–water interfacial tension and the formation of uniformly dispersed, near-spherical oil droplets. PVA, in contrast, increases system viscosity because of incompatibility with the tar. This work presents the first systematic comparison of anionic, zwitterionic, and nonionic surfactants for tar viscosity reduction under in-situ pyrolysis extraction conditions. The findings provide directly transferable guidance for field agent selection and dosage optimization.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":10019,"journal":{"name":"Chemical Engineering Research & Design","volume":"231 ","pages":"Pages 392-400"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chemical Engineering Research & Design","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0263876226003916","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/6/13 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CHEMICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
During in-situ underground coal pyrolysis, the tar generated ascends from the high-temperature zone toward the surface and cools naturally. This cooling induces a sharp viscosity increase that blocks the extraction channel, impeding engineering implementation. To address this obstruction, this study systematically evaluates the viscosity-reduction performance of five chemical agents—sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS), sodium dodecyl benzene sulfonate (SDBS), anhydrous betaine (BA), polyvinyl alcohol (PVA), and Tween 80—at 30 °C, simulating extraction conditions. Reduction ratios are measured across 1–9 wt% dosage. Contact angle, surface tension, and polarized-light microscopy reveal the underlying mechanisms. Results identify BA as the optimal agent, delivering a maximum viscosity reduction of 34.13% at 5 wt% dosage, representing a 2.2-fold improvement over simple water dilution (15.73%). This value is comparable to the ∼30% reduction reported for heavy oils using similar nonionic surfactants. Its superior performance originates from a marked decrease in oil–water interfacial tension and the formation of uniformly dispersed, near-spherical oil droplets. PVA, in contrast, increases system viscosity because of incompatibility with the tar. This work presents the first systematic comparison of anionic, zwitterionic, and nonionic surfactants for tar viscosity reduction under in-situ pyrolysis extraction conditions. The findings provide directly transferable guidance for field agent selection and dosage optimization.
期刊介绍:
ChERD aims to be the principal international journal for publication of high quality, original papers in chemical engineering.
Papers showing how research results can be used in chemical engineering design, and accounts of experimental or theoretical research work bringing new perspectives to established principles, highlighting unsolved problems or indicating directions for future research, are particularly welcome. Contributions that deal with new developments in plant or processes and that can be given quantitative expression are encouraged. The journal is especially interested in papers that extend the boundaries of traditional chemical engineering.