Domains of Psychosocial Risk in School-Aged Cochlear Implant Users.

IF 2.2
Irina Castellanos, Jessica Beer, David B Pisoni, William G Kronenberger
{"title":"Domains of Psychosocial Risk in School-Aged Cochlear Implant Users.","authors":"Irina Castellanos, Jessica Beer, David B Pisoni, William G Kronenberger","doi":"10.1044/2026_JSLHR-25-00907","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The purpose of this study was to identify domains of psychosocial risk specific to school-aged cochlear implant (CI) users and to explain individual differences in psychosocial risk within the CI sample.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>The parent-completed Behavior Assessment System for Children was used to measure psychosocial functioning behaviors in 59 children with CIs and 52 children with hearing 7-19 years of age. Item-level differences between the CI and hearing samples were identified, and a principal components analysis (PCA) was conducted on differentiating items to identify at-risk psychosocial behavioral constructs specific to CI users. Associations between CI-specific risk constructs and audiological, speech-language, and neurocognitive functioning were investigated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>CI users showed significantly greater psychosocial difficulties compared to their hearing peers on 14 items of the Behavior Assessment System for Children-Second Edition. A PCA on those items identified three domains that represent CI-specific psychosocial risks: communication deficit, social popularity, and executive functioning. Better receptive vocabulary and verbal comprehension were associated with better functioning in all three CI psychosocial risk domains. Better verbal short-term memory was associated with fewer risks related to communication deficit and social popularity, whereas better verbal working memory was associated with stronger executive functioning. Participants with stronger sentence recognition had fewer risks related to communication deficit.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Children and adolescents with CIs show specific elevated psychosocial risks for problems in social communication and executive functioning. Language abilities broadly influenced all psychosocial risk domains, while other cognitive abilities were more specifically associated with some psychosocial outcomes. Development of measures tailored to assess CI-specific domains of psychosocial risk is needed to inform targeted clinical intervention.</p><p><strong>Supplemental material: </strong>https://doi.org/10.23641/asha.32913569.</p>","PeriodicalId":520690,"journal":{"name":"Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR","volume":" ","pages":"4474-4489"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13577946/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1044/2026_JSLHR-25-00907","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/7/14 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to identify domains of psychosocial risk specific to school-aged cochlear implant (CI) users and to explain individual differences in psychosocial risk within the CI sample.

Method: The parent-completed Behavior Assessment System for Children was used to measure psychosocial functioning behaviors in 59 children with CIs and 52 children with hearing 7-19 years of age. Item-level differences between the CI and hearing samples were identified, and a principal components analysis (PCA) was conducted on differentiating items to identify at-risk psychosocial behavioral constructs specific to CI users. Associations between CI-specific risk constructs and audiological, speech-language, and neurocognitive functioning were investigated.

Results: CI users showed significantly greater psychosocial difficulties compared to their hearing peers on 14 items of the Behavior Assessment System for Children-Second Edition. A PCA on those items identified three domains that represent CI-specific psychosocial risks: communication deficit, social popularity, and executive functioning. Better receptive vocabulary and verbal comprehension were associated with better functioning in all three CI psychosocial risk domains. Better verbal short-term memory was associated with fewer risks related to communication deficit and social popularity, whereas better verbal working memory was associated with stronger executive functioning. Participants with stronger sentence recognition had fewer risks related to communication deficit.

Conclusions: Children and adolescents with CIs show specific elevated psychosocial risks for problems in social communication and executive functioning. Language abilities broadly influenced all psychosocial risk domains, while other cognitive abilities were more specifically associated with some psychosocial outcomes. Development of measures tailored to assess CI-specific domains of psychosocial risk is needed to inform targeted clinical intervention.

Supplemental material: https://doi.org/10.23641/asha.32913569.

学龄人工耳蜗使用者的社会心理风险领域。
目的:本研究的目的是确定学龄人工耳蜗(CI)使用者特有的社会心理风险领域,并解释CI样本中社会心理风险的个体差异。方法:采用家长填写的《儿童行为评估系统》对59例CIs儿童和52例7 ~ 19岁的听障儿童的心理社会功能行为进行测量。鉴定了CI和听力样本之间的项目水平差异,并对区分项目进行了主成分分析(PCA),以确定CI用户特有的高危心理社会行为结构。研究了ci特异性风险结构与听力学、言语语言和神经认知功能之间的关系。结果:CI使用者在《儿童行为评估系统-第二版》的14个项目上表现出比听力正常的同龄人更大的心理社会困难。对这些项目的PCA确定了代表ci特定社会心理风险的三个领域:沟通缺陷、社会人气和执行功能。更好的接受性词汇和言语理解与三个CI心理社会风险领域的更好功能相关。较好的口头短期记忆与较低的沟通缺陷和社会受欢迎程度相关,而较好的口头工作记忆与较强的执行功能相关。句子识别能力较强的参与者出现沟通缺陷的风险较小。结论:患有CIs的儿童和青少年在社会沟通和执行功能方面表现出特别高的社会心理风险。语言能力广泛影响所有社会心理风险领域,而其他认知能力与某些社会心理结果更具体地相关。需要制定量身定制的措施来评估ci特定领域的社会心理风险,以便为有针对性的临床干预提供信息。补充资料:https://doi.org/10.23641/asha.32913569。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书