Toxicity during induction of pulsed versus continuous prednisolone in children with acute lymphoblastic leukaemia: a multi-centre, open label, randomised, phase 3 trial from India (2016–2022)

IF 6.4 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Parag Das, Nandana Das, Gaurav Narula, Amita Trehan, Sameer Bakhshi, Venkatraman Radhakrishnan, Rachna Seth, Prashant Tembhare, Man Updesh Singh Sachdeva, Anita Chopra, Shirley Sundersingh, Soumyadeep Das, Manash Pratim Gogoi, Mayur Parihar, Rahul Bhattacharya, Shripad Banavali, Vaskar Saha, Shekhar Krishnan
{"title":"Toxicity during induction of pulsed versus continuous prednisolone in children with acute lymphoblastic leukaemia: a multi-centre, open label, randomised, phase 3 trial from India (2016–2022)","authors":"Parag Das,&nbsp;Nandana Das,&nbsp;Gaurav Narula,&nbsp;Amita Trehan,&nbsp;Sameer Bakhshi,&nbsp;Venkatraman Radhakrishnan,&nbsp;Rachna Seth,&nbsp;Prashant Tembhare,&nbsp;Man Updesh Singh Sachdeva,&nbsp;Anita Chopra,&nbsp;Shirley Sundersingh,&nbsp;Soumyadeep Das,&nbsp;Manash Pratim Gogoi,&nbsp;Mayur Parihar,&nbsp;Rahul Bhattacharya,&nbsp;Shripad Banavali,&nbsp;Vaskar Saha,&nbsp;Shekhar Krishnan","doi":"10.1016/j.lansea.2026.100788","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Despite the use of similar treatment protocols, induction treatment-related mortality (TRM) in children with ALL in India is 5%, compared to &lt;1% in high income countries. This study evaluated pulsed prednisolone during induction to reduce toxicity.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>ICiCLe-ALL-14 (CTRI/2015/12/006434), an open-label, randomised, multicentre trial. Children ≤ 10-years with newly diagnosed B-cell precursor ALL, risk-stratified to standard- or intermediate-risk, were randomised (1:1) to receive prednisolone 60 mg/m<sup>2</sup>/day, for 4 weeks with taper (R1A) or on days 1–14 and 22–28 (R1B) during induction. Primary outcomes were grade 3–5 toxicities. Secondary outcomes were complete remission (CR) rates, measurable residual disease (MRD) at end of induction (EoI), event-free (EFS), and overall survival (OS).</div></div><div><h3>Findings</h3><div>Of 3315 patients screened at 6 centres, 2505 were eligible and 1246 randomised (623 per group). Thirty (2.4%) patients died during induction: 22/623 (3.5%) and 8/623 (1.3%) in R1A and R1B respectively (absolute risk difference 2.3%, 95% CI 0.54–4.1; p = 0.0149). Relative risk of induction death was 2.75 (95% CI 1.2–6.1) for R1A versus R1B. Grade 3–5 toxicities occurred in 46.4% (289/623) and 45.4% (283/623) of patients (p = 0.7762). CR rates were 98.8% (581/588) and 98.0% (594/606); MRD ≥ 0.01% at EoI was 26.2% and 27.9%; 3-year EFS 72.7% (95% CI 68.2–76.7) and 72.2% (67.6–76.3); OS 85.0% (81.5–87.8) and 87.0% (83.6–89.3) in R1A and R1B respectively. Multivariable analysis confirmed higher risk of induction death with continuous prednisolone (HR 3.06, 95% CI 1.4–6.9, p = 0.0069) and anthracycline use (HR 5.44, 95% CI 1.6–18.9 p = 0.0077).</div></div><div><h3>Interpretation</h3><div>Pulsed prednisolone (R1B) during induction significantly reduced treatment-related deaths, particularly early deaths from infections compared to continuous dosing (R1A), without compromising CR rates, MRD clearance, EFS, or OS. Anthracycline use was an independent risk factor for induction mortality. Higher white cell count and anthracycline use independently predicted grade 3–4 toxicity.</div></div><div><h3>Funding</h3><div>This study was funded partly by the <span>Indian Council of Medical Research</span> (Reference <span><span>79/159/2015/NCD-III</span></span>), the <span>National Cancer Grid</span> (Reference <span><span>2016/001</span></span>), <span>DBT-Wellcome India Alliance</span> (Margdarshi <span><span>IA/M/12/1/500261</span></span>) and a centre grant from the <span>Tata Consultancy Services Foundation</span> to the trial centre.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":75136,"journal":{"name":"The Lancet regional health. Southeast Asia","volume":"50 ","pages":"Article 100788"},"PeriodicalIF":6.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13366301/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Lancet regional health. Southeast Asia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772368226000739","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/6/7 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Despite the use of similar treatment protocols, induction treatment-related mortality (TRM) in children with ALL in India is 5%, compared to <1% in high income countries. This study evaluated pulsed prednisolone during induction to reduce toxicity.

Methods

ICiCLe-ALL-14 (CTRI/2015/12/006434), an open-label, randomised, multicentre trial. Children ≤ 10-years with newly diagnosed B-cell precursor ALL, risk-stratified to standard- or intermediate-risk, were randomised (1:1) to receive prednisolone 60 mg/m2/day, for 4 weeks with taper (R1A) or on days 1–14 and 22–28 (R1B) during induction. Primary outcomes were grade 3–5 toxicities. Secondary outcomes were complete remission (CR) rates, measurable residual disease (MRD) at end of induction (EoI), event-free (EFS), and overall survival (OS).

Findings

Of 3315 patients screened at 6 centres, 2505 were eligible and 1246 randomised (623 per group). Thirty (2.4%) patients died during induction: 22/623 (3.5%) and 8/623 (1.3%) in R1A and R1B respectively (absolute risk difference 2.3%, 95% CI 0.54–4.1; p = 0.0149). Relative risk of induction death was 2.75 (95% CI 1.2–6.1) for R1A versus R1B. Grade 3–5 toxicities occurred in 46.4% (289/623) and 45.4% (283/623) of patients (p = 0.7762). CR rates were 98.8% (581/588) and 98.0% (594/606); MRD ≥ 0.01% at EoI was 26.2% and 27.9%; 3-year EFS 72.7% (95% CI 68.2–76.7) and 72.2% (67.6–76.3); OS 85.0% (81.5–87.8) and 87.0% (83.6–89.3) in R1A and R1B respectively. Multivariable analysis confirmed higher risk of induction death with continuous prednisolone (HR 3.06, 95% CI 1.4–6.9, p = 0.0069) and anthracycline use (HR 5.44, 95% CI 1.6–18.9 p = 0.0077).

Interpretation

Pulsed prednisolone (R1B) during induction significantly reduced treatment-related deaths, particularly early deaths from infections compared to continuous dosing (R1A), without compromising CR rates, MRD clearance, EFS, or OS. Anthracycline use was an independent risk factor for induction mortality. Higher white cell count and anthracycline use independently predicted grade 3–4 toxicity.

Funding

This study was funded partly by the Indian Council of Medical Research (Reference 79/159/2015/NCD-III), the National Cancer Grid (Reference 2016/001), DBT-Wellcome India Alliance (Margdarshi IA/M/12/1/500261) and a centre grant from the Tata Consultancy Services Foundation to the trial centre.
急性淋巴细胞白血病患儿脉冲与连续泼尼松龙诱导期间的毒性:印度一项多中心、开放标签、随机、3期试验(2016-2022)。
背景:尽管使用了类似的治疗方案,但与ICiCLe-ALL-14 (CTRI/2015/12/006434)这一开放标签、随机、多中心试验相比,印度ALL患儿诱导治疗相关死亡率(TRM)为5%。≤10岁的新诊断b细胞前体ALL患儿,风险分层为标准或中等风险,随机(1:1)接受强的松龙60mg /m2/天,4周逐渐减少(R1A)或诱导期间的第1-14天和第22-28天(R1B)。主要结局为3-5级毒性。次要结局是完全缓解(CR)率、诱导结束时可测量的残留疾病(MRD)、无事件(EFS)和总生存期(OS)。结果:在6个中心筛选的3315例患者中,2505例符合条件,1246例随机(每组623例)。30例(2.4%)患者在诱导过程中死亡:R1A组22/623例(3.5%),R1B组8/623例(1.3%)(绝对风险差2.3%,95% CI 0.54-4.1; p = 0.0149)。R1A与R1B诱导死亡的相对危险度为2.75 (95% CI 1.2-6.1)。46.4%(289/623)和45.4%(283/623)的患者出现3-5级毒性反应(p = 0.7762)。CR率分别为98.8%(581/588)和98.0% (594/606);在EoI时MRD≥0.01%分别为26.2%和27.9%;3年EFS分别为72.7% (95% CI 68.2-76.7)和72.2% (67.6-76.3);R1A和R1B的OS分别为85.0%(81.5 ~ 87.8)和87.0%(83.6 ~ 89.3)。多变量分析证实,持续使用强的松龙(HR 3.06, 95% CI 1.4-6.9, p = 0.0069)和蒽环类药物(HR 5.44, 95% CI 1.6-18.9 p = 0.0077)诱导死亡的风险更高。解释:与连续给药(R1A)相比,诱导期间的脉冲强的松龙(R1B)显著降低了治疗相关的死亡,特别是感染导致的早期死亡,而不影响CR率、MRD清除率、EFS或OS。蒽环类药物的使用是诱导死亡的独立危险因素。较高的白细胞计数和蒽环类药物使用独立预测3-4级毒性。资金:本研究部分由印度医学研究委员会(参考文献79/159/2015/ ndd - iii)、国家癌症网格(参考文献2016/001)、DBT-Wellcome印度联盟(Margdarshi IA/M/12/1/500261)和塔塔咨询服务基金会向试验中心提供的中心赠款资助。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书