Impact of Vagus Nerve Stimulation on Suicidal Ideation in Markedly Treatment-Resistant Major Depression: A RECOVER Study Report.

IF 4.2 2区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY
Vasilis C Hristidis, Victoria De Leon, Andrew D Van Der Vaart, Harold A Sackeim, A John Rush, Scott T Aaronson, Mark T Bunker, Rebecca M Allen, Yvette Sheline, Ziad Nahas, David L Dunner, Britt M Gott, Ying-Chieh Lee, Charles Gordon, Quyen Tran, Olivia Shy, João Quevedo, Patricio Riva-Posse, John Zajecka, Brian J Mickey, Walter Duffy, Christopher L Kriedt, Maria A Oquendo, Charles R Conway
{"title":"Impact of Vagus Nerve Stimulation on Suicidal Ideation in Markedly Treatment-Resistant Major Depression: A RECOVER Study Report.","authors":"Vasilis C Hristidis, Victoria De Leon, Andrew D Van Der Vaart, Harold A Sackeim, A John Rush, Scott T Aaronson, Mark T Bunker, Rebecca M Allen, Yvette Sheline, Ziad Nahas, David L Dunner, Britt M Gott, Ying-Chieh Lee, Charles Gordon, Quyen Tran, Olivia Shy, João Quevedo, Patricio Riva-Posse, John Zajecka, Brian J Mickey, Walter Duffy, Christopher L Kriedt, Maria A Oquendo, Charles R Conway","doi":"10.4088/JCP.25m16296","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p></p><p><p><b>Objective:</b> To compare effects of adjunctive active versus sham vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) on suicidal ideation (SI) in markedly treatment-resistant depression (TRD).</p><p><p><b>Methods:</b> RECOVER trial participants with nonpsychotic major depressive disorder and insufficient benefit from ≥4 adequate antidepressant trials in the current episode were randomized to adjunctive active or sham VNS plus treatment as usual over 12 months. SI was assessed at baseline and monthly (months 3-12) following VNS parameter titration/ pseudotitration. A composite suicidal ideation (CSI) score (range, 0-9) used SI items from 3 depressive symptom ratings to assess VNS effects on SI for those with (CSI ≥3) and without (CSI ≤2) significant baseline SI.</p><p><p><b>Results:</b> This exploratory study involved a sample (N = 463) who averaged 13.3 failed lifetime antidepressant treatments, with 17.7 years in the current depressive episode; 40.4% had previously attempted suicide. Among individuals with baseline SI, the likelihood of meaningful improvement (CSI score change ≥3) was greater with active than sham VNS (odds ratio [OR] = 1.43; 95% CI, 1.004-2.021; <i>P</i> < .05) over 10 months of evaluation. Additionally, active VNS was superior to sham VNS for SI remission (CSI ≤2) in months 10-12 (OR = 1.67; 95% CI, 1.007-2.763; <i>P</i> < .05). VNS did not significantly worsen SI in participants.</p><p><p><b>Conclusions:</b> This study suggests that, compared to sham VNS, active VNS reduces SI and potentially induces SI remission among participants with chronic TRD and baseline SI. Furthermore, VNS does not appear to worsen or induce SI in participants, regardless of their baseline SI status. Further research is warranted.</p><p><p><b>Trial Registration:</b> ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03887715.</p>","PeriodicalId":50234,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Psychiatry","volume":"87 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4088/JCP.25m16296","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To compare effects of adjunctive active versus sham vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) on suicidal ideation (SI) in markedly treatment-resistant depression (TRD).

Methods: RECOVER trial participants with nonpsychotic major depressive disorder and insufficient benefit from ≥4 adequate antidepressant trials in the current episode were randomized to adjunctive active or sham VNS plus treatment as usual over 12 months. SI was assessed at baseline and monthly (months 3-12) following VNS parameter titration/ pseudotitration. A composite suicidal ideation (CSI) score (range, 0-9) used SI items from 3 depressive symptom ratings to assess VNS effects on SI for those with (CSI ≥3) and without (CSI ≤2) significant baseline SI.

Results: This exploratory study involved a sample (N = 463) who averaged 13.3 failed lifetime antidepressant treatments, with 17.7 years in the current depressive episode; 40.4% had previously attempted suicide. Among individuals with baseline SI, the likelihood of meaningful improvement (CSI score change ≥3) was greater with active than sham VNS (odds ratio [OR] = 1.43; 95% CI, 1.004-2.021; P < .05) over 10 months of evaluation. Additionally, active VNS was superior to sham VNS for SI remission (CSI ≤2) in months 10-12 (OR = 1.67; 95% CI, 1.007-2.763; P < .05). VNS did not significantly worsen SI in participants.

Conclusions: This study suggests that, compared to sham VNS, active VNS reduces SI and potentially induces SI remission among participants with chronic TRD and baseline SI. Furthermore, VNS does not appear to worsen or induce SI in participants, regardless of their baseline SI status. Further research is warranted.

Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03887715.

迷走神经刺激对明显难治性重度抑郁症患者自杀意念的影响:一项康复研究报告。
目的:比较辅助主动与假迷走神经刺激(VNS)对明显难治性抑郁症(TRD)患者自杀意念(SI)的影响。方法:在12个月的时间里,对非精神病性重性抑郁障碍且从≥4种充分的抗抑郁药物试验中获益不足的患者随机分为辅助活性或假VNS加常规治疗组。在VNS参数滴定/假滴定后,在基线和每月(3-12个月)评估SI。综合自杀意念(CSI)评分(范围,0-9)使用3个抑郁症状评分中的SI项目来评估VNS对(CSI≥3)和(CSI≤2)基线SI显著者的SI影响。结果:这项探索性研究纳入了一个样本(N = 463),平均13.3例终生抗抑郁治疗失败,当前抑郁发作期为17.7年;40.4%的人曾试图自杀。在基线SI的个体中,在10个月的评估中,主动VNS比假VNS有意义改善(CSI评分变化≥3)的可能性更大(优势比[OR] = 1.43; 95% CI, 1.004-2.021; P < 0.05)。此外,在10-12个月,活动性VNS在SI缓解(CSI≤2)方面优于假性VNS (OR = 1.67; 95% CI, 1.007-2.763; P < 0.05)。VNS并未显著加重参与者的SI。结论:本研究表明,与假VNS相比,在慢性TRD和基线SI患者中,主动VNS可减少SI并可能诱导SI缓解。此外,无论参与者的基线SI状态如何,VNS似乎不会加重或诱发SI。进一步的研究是有必要的。试验注册:ClinicalTrials.gov标识符:NCT03887715。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Clinical Psychiatry
Journal of Clinical Psychiatry 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
1.90%
发文量
0
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: For over 75 years, The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry has been a leading source of peer-reviewed articles offering the latest information on mental health topics to psychiatrists and other medical professionals.The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry is the leading psychiatric resource for clinical information and covers disorders including depression, bipolar disorder, schizophrenia, anxiety, addiction, posttraumatic stress disorder, and attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder while exploring the newest advances in diagnosis and treatment.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书