Predicting climate-driven urban rat release and associated risks across climate zones.

IF 2.3 3区 环境科学与生态学 Q3 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Michael H Parsons, Zbigniew P Piotrowski, Piotr Bebas, Raffaele d'Isa, Rafal Stryjek
{"title":"Predicting climate-driven urban rat release and associated risks across climate zones.","authors":"Michael H Parsons, Zbigniew P Piotrowski, Piotr Bebas, Raffaele d'Isa, Rafal Stryjek","doi":"10.1007/s10393-026-01808-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Urban rat populations are widely assumed to increase under climate change, largely due to recent studies. This narrative is often extended to cities worldwide, irrespective of their local climate. Yet, this oversimplification obscures complex ecological and social processes that shape commensal rat dynamics. Here, we synthesize evidence across rodent ecology, epidemiology, urbanization, and human behavior to propose a multi‑dimensional framework for urban rat‑release: a climate‑mediated relaxation of seasonal constraints that reduces winter burrow confinement and increases above‑ground activity, dispersal, apparency, and reproductive output in cold‑temperate cities, often producing short‑term population increases before density‑dependent processes stabilize numbers. Warming winters may extend breeding windows and increase winter food availability, but these effects interact with expanding arthropod vectors, shifting pathogen pressures, and the compounding forces of urban architecture, waste management systems, and human activity. Human social responses-sanitation reforms, surges in panic‑driven control, and predictable political attention cycles-can either magnify or suppress populations, often more strongly than ecological factors. We argue that climate change will not produce uniform increases in rat abundance; instead, outcomes will vary predictably across cold‑temperate, mild‑temperate, and tropical cities depending on the alignment of these interacting dimensions. Importantly, rat populations may stabilize or surge depending on how disease dynamics, density-dependent constraints, and public responses converge. This framework provides a foundation for forecasting models and offers practical guidance for urban planning, public health, and policy development in warming climates where rats and vectors reshape urban risks. These dynamics align with the One Health perspective, which emphasizes the interdependence of human, animal, and environmental systems.</p>","PeriodicalId":51027,"journal":{"name":"Ecohealth","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecohealth","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10393-026-01808-3","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Urban rat populations are widely assumed to increase under climate change, largely due to recent studies. This narrative is often extended to cities worldwide, irrespective of their local climate. Yet, this oversimplification obscures complex ecological and social processes that shape commensal rat dynamics. Here, we synthesize evidence across rodent ecology, epidemiology, urbanization, and human behavior to propose a multi‑dimensional framework for urban rat‑release: a climate‑mediated relaxation of seasonal constraints that reduces winter burrow confinement and increases above‑ground activity, dispersal, apparency, and reproductive output in cold‑temperate cities, often producing short‑term population increases before density‑dependent processes stabilize numbers. Warming winters may extend breeding windows and increase winter food availability, but these effects interact with expanding arthropod vectors, shifting pathogen pressures, and the compounding forces of urban architecture, waste management systems, and human activity. Human social responses-sanitation reforms, surges in panic‑driven control, and predictable political attention cycles-can either magnify or suppress populations, often more strongly than ecological factors. We argue that climate change will not produce uniform increases in rat abundance; instead, outcomes will vary predictably across cold‑temperate, mild‑temperate, and tropical cities depending on the alignment of these interacting dimensions. Importantly, rat populations may stabilize or surge depending on how disease dynamics, density-dependent constraints, and public responses converge. This framework provides a foundation for forecasting models and offers practical guidance for urban planning, public health, and policy development in warming climates where rats and vectors reshape urban risks. These dynamics align with the One Health perspective, which emphasizes the interdependence of human, animal, and environmental systems.

预测气候驱动的城市老鼠释放及其相关风险。
人们普遍认为,在气候变化的影响下,城市老鼠的数量会增加,这主要是由于最近的研究。这种说法经常延伸到世界各地的城市,而不考虑当地的气候。然而,这种过度简化模糊了形成共生鼠动态的复杂生态和社会过程。在这里,我们综合了啮齿动物生态学、流行病学、城市化和人类行为方面的证据,提出了一个城市老鼠释放的多维框架:气候介导的季节性约束放松,减少了冬季洞穴限制,增加了寒冷温带城市的地上活动、分散、透明度和繁殖产出,通常会在密度依赖过程稳定数量之前产生短期的种群增加。暖冬可能延长繁殖窗口期,增加冬季食物供应,但这些影响与节肢动物媒介的扩大、病原体压力的变化以及城市建筑、废物管理系统和人类活动的复合力量相互作用。人类的社会反应——卫生改革、恐慌驱动控制的激增以及可预测的政治关注周期——可以放大或抑制人口,往往比生态因素更强烈。我们认为,气候变化不会导致老鼠数量的均匀增加;相反,寒温带、温和温带和热带城市的结果将根据这些相互作用维度的一致性而发生可预测的变化。重要的是,鼠群可能会稳定或激增,这取决于疾病动态、密度依赖性约束和公众反应的聚合。该框架为预测模型提供了基础,并为气候变暖时的城市规划、公共卫生和政策制定提供了实用指导,在这种气候下,老鼠和病媒会重塑城市风险。这些动态与强调人类、动物和环境系统相互依存的“同一个健康”观点一致。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Ecohealth
Ecohealth 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
4.00%
发文量
45
审稿时长
>24 weeks
期刊介绍: EcoHealth aims to advance research, practice, and knowledge integration at the interface of ecology and health by publishing high quality research and review articles that address and profile new ideas, developments, and programs. The journal’s scope encompasses research that integrates concepts and theory from many fields of scholarship (including ecological, social and health sciences, and the humanities) and draws upon multiple types of knowledge, including those of relevance to practice and policy. Papers address integrated ecology and health challenges arising in public health, human and veterinary medicine, conservation and ecosystem management, rural and urban development and planning, and other fields that address the social-ecological context of health. The journal is a central platform for fulfilling the mission of the EcoHealth Alliance to strive for sustainable health of people, domestic animals, wildlife, and ecosystems by promoting discovery, understanding, and transdisciplinarity. The journal invites substantial contributions in the following areas: One Health and Conservation Medicine o Integrated research on health of humans, wildlife, livestock and ecosystems o Research and policy in ecology, public health, and agricultural sustainability o Emerging infectious diseases affecting people, wildlife, domestic animals, and plants o Research and practice linking human and animal health and/or social-ecological systems o Anthropogenic environmental change and drivers of disease emergence in humans, wildlife, livestock and ecosystems o Health of humans and animals in relation to terrestrial, freshwater, and marine ecosystems Ecosystem Approaches to Health o Systems thinking and social-ecological systems in relation to health o Transdiiplinary approaches to health, ecosystems and society.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书