Evaluating knowledge acquisition, confidence, and cognitive workload in immersive virtual reality anatomy education: a prospective study of medical students.

IF 1.2 4区 医学 Q2 Medicine
Christopher M Ahmad, Ambrose Loc Ngo, Rae-Anne Kastle, Phil Sheridan, Uyen Tam Nguyen, Melissa Zolnierz
{"title":"Evaluating knowledge acquisition, confidence, and cognitive workload in immersive virtual reality anatomy education: a prospective study of medical students.","authors":"Christopher M Ahmad, Ambrose Loc Ngo, Rae-Anne Kastle, Phil Sheridan, Uyen Tam Nguyen, Melissa Zolnierz","doi":"10.1007/s00276-026-03942-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Immersive virtual reality (VR) allows learners to interact with anatomical structures in three dimensions, potentially improving spatial understanding compared to traditional instructional methods. While VR is increasingly incorporated into medical curricula, prospective studies evaluating both learning outcomes and experiential measures remain limited. This study aimed to evaluate the impact of a single immersive VR anatomy session on knowledge acquisition, learner confidence, cognitive workload, and perceived immersion among first-year medical students.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this prospective educational intervention, first-year medical students at Kansas City University completed a standardized immersive VR anatomy module. Anatomy knowledge was assessed using a 20-item multiple-choice examination administered pre-session, immediately post-session, and at a 20-day follow-up. Learner confidence was measured using a 5-point Likert scale. Cognitive workload was assessed using the NASA Task Load Index (NASA-TLX), and immersion was measured using validated presence and usability items.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Anatomy knowledge improved significantly from pre- to post-intervention (mean increase 7.2% points, 95% CI [3.9, 10.6], p < 0.001). However, scores declined at delayed follow-up (mean change - 15.3% points from post, 95% CI [-19.8, -10.7], p < 0.001), falling below baseline mean levels. Confidence demonstrated a significant upward shift in distribution (p = 0.018), although change in confidence was not associated with knowledge gain (p = 0.863). Cognitive workload was not significantly associated with learning outcomes, while small negative correlations were observed between knowledge gain and both presence (r = -0.31, p = 0.022) and usability (r = -0.28, p = 0.034).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Immersive VR produces significant short-term improvements in anatomy knowledge and learner confidence but does not sustain retention following a single exposure. While effective for enhancing short-term anatomy knowledge and learner engagement, these findings suggest that immersive VR may be most effective when integrated as a complementary component within a multimodal anatomy curriculum rather than used as a standalone instructional modality.</p>","PeriodicalId":49461,"journal":{"name":"Surgical and Radiologic Anatomy","volume":"48 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Surgical and Radiologic Anatomy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00276-026-03942-7","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Immersive virtual reality (VR) allows learners to interact with anatomical structures in three dimensions, potentially improving spatial understanding compared to traditional instructional methods. While VR is increasingly incorporated into medical curricula, prospective studies evaluating both learning outcomes and experiential measures remain limited. This study aimed to evaluate the impact of a single immersive VR anatomy session on knowledge acquisition, learner confidence, cognitive workload, and perceived immersion among first-year medical students.

Methods: In this prospective educational intervention, first-year medical students at Kansas City University completed a standardized immersive VR anatomy module. Anatomy knowledge was assessed using a 20-item multiple-choice examination administered pre-session, immediately post-session, and at a 20-day follow-up. Learner confidence was measured using a 5-point Likert scale. Cognitive workload was assessed using the NASA Task Load Index (NASA-TLX), and immersion was measured using validated presence and usability items.

Results: Anatomy knowledge improved significantly from pre- to post-intervention (mean increase 7.2% points, 95% CI [3.9, 10.6], p < 0.001). However, scores declined at delayed follow-up (mean change - 15.3% points from post, 95% CI [-19.8, -10.7], p < 0.001), falling below baseline mean levels. Confidence demonstrated a significant upward shift in distribution (p = 0.018), although change in confidence was not associated with knowledge gain (p = 0.863). Cognitive workload was not significantly associated with learning outcomes, while small negative correlations were observed between knowledge gain and both presence (r = -0.31, p = 0.022) and usability (r = -0.28, p = 0.034).

Conclusion: Immersive VR produces significant short-term improvements in anatomy knowledge and learner confidence but does not sustain retention following a single exposure. While effective for enhancing short-term anatomy knowledge and learner engagement, these findings suggest that immersive VR may be most effective when integrated as a complementary component within a multimodal anatomy curriculum rather than used as a standalone instructional modality.

评估沉浸式虚拟现实解剖学教育中的知识获取、信心和认知负荷:一项对医学生的前瞻性研究。
背景:沉浸式虚拟现实(VR)允许学习者与三维解剖结构互动,与传统教学方法相比,有可能提高空间理解能力。虽然虚拟现实越来越多地纳入医学课程,但评估学习成果和体验措施的前瞻性研究仍然有限。本研究旨在评估一次沉浸式VR解剖学课程对一年级医学生知识获取、学习者信心、认知工作量和感知沉浸感的影响。方法:在这项前瞻性教育干预中,堪萨斯城大学的一年级医学生完成了一个标准化的沉浸式VR解剖学模块。解剖知识的评估采用20项多项选择题考试,分别在治疗前、治疗后和20天的随访中进行。学习者信心采用李克特5分量表进行测量。认知负荷使用NASA任务负荷指数(NASA- tlx)进行评估,沉浸度使用验证存在和可用性项目进行测量。结果:从干预前到干预后,解剖学知识显著提高(平均增加7.2%点,95% CI [3.9, 10.6], p)。结论:沉浸式VR在解剖学知识和学习者信心方面产生了显着的短期改善,但在单次接触后不能维持保留。虽然对提高短期解剖学知识和学习者参与度是有效的,但这些研究结果表明,当将沉浸式VR作为多模态解剖学课程的补充组成部分而不是作为独立的教学模式使用时,沉浸式VR可能是最有效的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Surgical and Radiologic Anatomy
Surgical and Radiologic Anatomy Medicine-Pathology and Forensic Medicine
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
14.30%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Anatomy is a morphological science which cannot fail to interest the clinician. The practical application of anatomical research to clinical problems necessitates special adaptation and selectivity in choosing from numerous international works. Although there is a tendency to believe that meaningful advances in anatomy are unlikely, constant revision is necessary. Surgical and Radiologic Anatomy, the first international journal of Clinical anatomy has been created in this spirit. Its goal is to serve clinicians, regardless of speciality-physicians, surgeons, radiologists or other specialists-as an indispensable aid with which they can improve their knowledge of anatomy. Each issue includes: Original papers, review articles, articles on the anatomical bases of medical, surgical and radiological techniques, articles of normal radiologic anatomy, brief reviews of anatomical publications of clinical interest. Particular attention is given to high quality illustrations, which are indispensable for a better understanding of anatomical problems. Surgical and Radiologic Anatomy is a journal written by anatomists for clinicians with a special interest in anatomy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书