Effects of Long-Term Contact Lens Use on Vestibulo-Ocular Reflex Using Rotary Chair and Video Head Impulse Testing.

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q3 AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY
American Journal of Audiology Pub Date : 2026-09-03 Epub Date: 2026-07-15 DOI:10.1044/2026_AJA-25-00275
Hanna Kolwyck, Raghav H Jha
{"title":"Effects of Long-Term Contact Lens Use on Vestibulo-Ocular Reflex Using Rotary Chair and Video Head Impulse Testing.","authors":"Hanna Kolwyck, Raghav H Jha","doi":"10.1044/2026_AJA-25-00275","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study investigated whether long-term contact lens wear influences vestibulo-ocular reflex (VOR) gain and suppression across a range of stimulus frequencies. Despite frequent use of contact lenses in clinical populations, it remains unclear how optical correction affects VOR assessment outcomes.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Twelve myopic adults (four men, eight women; 21-25 years) who wore contact lenses at least 12 hr per day, 5 days per week, participated. VOR gain and suppression were measured using sinusoidal harmonic acceleration (SHA) rotary chair testing at 0.04-0.64 Hz, and VOR gain at high frequencies using the video head impulse test (vHIT). Each participant was tested twice: with and without contact lenses. Investigators also noted pupil tracking accuracy.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>VOR gain increased with frequency, consistent with physiological norms. No significant differences were observed between contact lens and no-contact lens conditions for VOR gain or suppression (SHA and vHIT, right and left canals). Pupil tracking was occasionally more challenging, and variability in VOR gain was higher with contact lenses.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Long-term contact lens wear does not significantly affect VOR gain or suppression. Clinicians may test patients with or without contact lenses; however, caution is advised when lenses are worn due to occasional pupil tracking difficulties and increased response variability.</p>","PeriodicalId":49241,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Audiology","volume":" ","pages":"1022-1030"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Audiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1044/2026_AJA-25-00275","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/7/15 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: This study investigated whether long-term contact lens wear influences vestibulo-ocular reflex (VOR) gain and suppression across a range of stimulus frequencies. Despite frequent use of contact lenses in clinical populations, it remains unclear how optical correction affects VOR assessment outcomes.

Method: Twelve myopic adults (four men, eight women; 21-25 years) who wore contact lenses at least 12 hr per day, 5 days per week, participated. VOR gain and suppression were measured using sinusoidal harmonic acceleration (SHA) rotary chair testing at 0.04-0.64 Hz, and VOR gain at high frequencies using the video head impulse test (vHIT). Each participant was tested twice: with and without contact lenses. Investigators also noted pupil tracking accuracy.

Results: VOR gain increased with frequency, consistent with physiological norms. No significant differences were observed between contact lens and no-contact lens conditions for VOR gain or suppression (SHA and vHIT, right and left canals). Pupil tracking was occasionally more challenging, and variability in VOR gain was higher with contact lenses.

Conclusions: Long-term contact lens wear does not significantly affect VOR gain or suppression. Clinicians may test patients with or without contact lenses; however, caution is advised when lenses are worn due to occasional pupil tracking difficulties and increased response variability.

长期使用隐形眼镜对前庭-眼反射的影响。
目的:本研究探讨了长期佩戴隐形眼镜是否会影响前庭眼反射(VOR)在刺激频率范围内的增益和抑制。尽管临床人群经常使用隐形眼镜,但目前尚不清楚光学矫正如何影响VOR评估结果。方法:12名近视成人(4男8女,21-25岁),每周5天,每天佩戴隐形眼镜至少12小时。采用0.04-0.64 Hz正弦谐波加速(SHA)旋转椅测试测量VOR增益和抑制,采用视频头脉冲测试(vHIT)测量高频VOR增益。每位参与者都接受了两次测试:戴隐形眼镜和不戴隐形眼镜。调查人员还注意到了瞳孔追踪的准确性。结果:VOR增益随频率增加而增加,符合生理规范。在隐形眼镜和非隐形眼镜条件下,在VOR增益或抑制(SHA和vHIT,右管和左管)方面没有观察到显著差异。瞳孔追踪有时更具挑战性,佩戴隐形眼镜的VOR增益变异性更高。结论:长期佩戴隐形眼镜对VOR增益或抑制无显著影响。临床医生可以对戴或不戴隐形眼镜的患者进行测试;然而,由于偶尔瞳孔追踪困难和反应变异性增加,建议佩戴镜片时要谨慎。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
American Journal of Audiology
American Journal of Audiology AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY-OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
16.70%
发文量
163
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Mission: AJA publishes peer-reviewed research and other scholarly articles pertaining to clinical audiology methods and issues, and serves as an outlet for discussion of related professional and educational issues and ideas. The journal is an international outlet for research on clinical research pertaining to screening, diagnosis, management and outcomes of hearing and balance disorders as well as the etiologies and characteristics of these disorders. The clinical orientation of the journal allows for the publication of reports on audiology as implemented nationally and internationally, including novel clinical procedures, approaches, and cases. AJA seeks to advance evidence-based practice by disseminating the results of new studies as well as providing a forum for critical reviews and meta-analyses of previously published work. Scope: The broad field of clinical audiology, including audiologic/aural rehabilitation; balance and balance disorders; cultural and linguistic diversity; detection, diagnosis, prevention, habilitation, rehabilitation, and monitoring of hearing loss; hearing aids, cochlear implants, and hearing-assistive technology; hearing disorders; lifespan perspectives on auditory function; speech perception; and tinnitus.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书