{"title":"Effects of Long-Term Contact Lens Use on Vestibulo-Ocular Reflex Using Rotary Chair and Video Head Impulse Testing.","authors":"Hanna Kolwyck, Raghav H Jha","doi":"10.1044/2026_AJA-25-00275","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study investigated whether long-term contact lens wear influences vestibulo-ocular reflex (VOR) gain and suppression across a range of stimulus frequencies. Despite frequent use of contact lenses in clinical populations, it remains unclear how optical correction affects VOR assessment outcomes.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Twelve myopic adults (four men, eight women; 21-25 years) who wore contact lenses at least 12 hr per day, 5 days per week, participated. VOR gain and suppression were measured using sinusoidal harmonic acceleration (SHA) rotary chair testing at 0.04-0.64 Hz, and VOR gain at high frequencies using the video head impulse test (vHIT). Each participant was tested twice: with and without contact lenses. Investigators also noted pupil tracking accuracy.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>VOR gain increased with frequency, consistent with physiological norms. No significant differences were observed between contact lens and no-contact lens conditions for VOR gain or suppression (SHA and vHIT, right and left canals). Pupil tracking was occasionally more challenging, and variability in VOR gain was higher with contact lenses.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Long-term contact lens wear does not significantly affect VOR gain or suppression. Clinicians may test patients with or without contact lenses; however, caution is advised when lenses are worn due to occasional pupil tracking difficulties and increased response variability.</p>","PeriodicalId":49241,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Audiology","volume":" ","pages":"1022-1030"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Audiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1044/2026_AJA-25-00275","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/7/15 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose: This study investigated whether long-term contact lens wear influences vestibulo-ocular reflex (VOR) gain and suppression across a range of stimulus frequencies. Despite frequent use of contact lenses in clinical populations, it remains unclear how optical correction affects VOR assessment outcomes.
Method: Twelve myopic adults (four men, eight women; 21-25 years) who wore contact lenses at least 12 hr per day, 5 days per week, participated. VOR gain and suppression were measured using sinusoidal harmonic acceleration (SHA) rotary chair testing at 0.04-0.64 Hz, and VOR gain at high frequencies using the video head impulse test (vHIT). Each participant was tested twice: with and without contact lenses. Investigators also noted pupil tracking accuracy.
Results: VOR gain increased with frequency, consistent with physiological norms. No significant differences were observed between contact lens and no-contact lens conditions for VOR gain or suppression (SHA and vHIT, right and left canals). Pupil tracking was occasionally more challenging, and variability in VOR gain was higher with contact lenses.
Conclusions: Long-term contact lens wear does not significantly affect VOR gain or suppression. Clinicians may test patients with or without contact lenses; however, caution is advised when lenses are worn due to occasional pupil tracking difficulties and increased response variability.
期刊介绍:
Mission: AJA publishes peer-reviewed research and other scholarly articles pertaining to clinical audiology methods and issues, and serves as an outlet for discussion of related professional and educational issues and ideas. The journal is an international outlet for research on clinical research pertaining to screening, diagnosis, management and outcomes of hearing and balance disorders as well as the etiologies and characteristics of these disorders. The clinical orientation of the journal allows for the publication of reports on audiology as implemented nationally and internationally, including novel clinical procedures, approaches, and cases. AJA seeks to advance evidence-based practice by disseminating the results of new studies as well as providing a forum for critical reviews and meta-analyses of previously published work.
Scope: The broad field of clinical audiology, including audiologic/aural rehabilitation; balance and balance disorders; cultural and linguistic diversity; detection, diagnosis, prevention, habilitation, rehabilitation, and monitoring of hearing loss; hearing aids, cochlear implants, and hearing-assistive technology; hearing disorders; lifespan perspectives on auditory function; speech perception; and tinnitus.