Moral distress in healthcare professionals working with motor neuron disease.

IF 2.4 4区 医学 Q3 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES
Megan Walls, Austin Claffey, Miriam Galvin
{"title":"Moral distress in healthcare professionals working with motor neuron disease.","authors":"Megan Walls, Austin Claffey, Miriam Galvin","doi":"10.1017/S1478951526103058","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To (1) identify clinical situations that may contribute to the experience of moral distress (MD) among professionals working with motor neuron disease (MND), (2) measure the occurrence and intensity of MD, and (3) explore associations with professional quality of life, turnover intention, and associated risk and/or protective factors.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional online survey was distributed to healthcare professionals working in MND services across Europe. Data were analyzed using descriptive and inferential statistics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 230 responses from professionals across 17 European countries were analyzed from the international survey. And 67% of respondents indicated that MD resonated with their experience of working with MND. Those who considered leaving or changing their position due to the challenges associated with caring for this patient population were also more likely to report resonance with MD (χ<sup>2</sup> = 7.772, <i>p</i> = 0.020). The intensity of MD was associated with reduced professional quality of life (burnout [β = 0.106, <i>p</i> < 0.05], and secondary traumatic stress [β = 2.881, <i>p</i> < 0.001]). A total of 24 clinical scenarios were identified as potential contributors to experiences of MD in this population. Across all professional groups, service-/organization-level factors were the most common and distressing barriers to providing effective MND care.</p><p><strong>Significance of results: </strong>This study demonstrates that MD is experienced by healthcare professionals working with MND across Europe. MD was associated with reduced professional quality of life and increased intentions to leave or change positions, underscoring its potential implications for workforce retention and sustainability. The findings show that system/organization, patient/condition and family-level causes are the primary drivers of MD in this population. Future research should focus on evaluating the effectiveness of interventions designed to address these key drivers and mitigate the impact of MD among healthcare professionals working with MND.</p>","PeriodicalId":47898,"journal":{"name":"Palliative & Supportive Care","volume":"24 ","pages":"e196"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13430491/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Palliative & Supportive Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S1478951526103058","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: To (1) identify clinical situations that may contribute to the experience of moral distress (MD) among professionals working with motor neuron disease (MND), (2) measure the occurrence and intensity of MD, and (3) explore associations with professional quality of life, turnover intention, and associated risk and/or protective factors.

Methods: A cross-sectional online survey was distributed to healthcare professionals working in MND services across Europe. Data were analyzed using descriptive and inferential statistics.

Results: In total, 230 responses from professionals across 17 European countries were analyzed from the international survey. And 67% of respondents indicated that MD resonated with their experience of working with MND. Those who considered leaving or changing their position due to the challenges associated with caring for this patient population were also more likely to report resonance with MD (χ2 = 7.772, p = 0.020). The intensity of MD was associated with reduced professional quality of life (burnout [β = 0.106, p < 0.05], and secondary traumatic stress [β = 2.881, p < 0.001]). A total of 24 clinical scenarios were identified as potential contributors to experiences of MD in this population. Across all professional groups, service-/organization-level factors were the most common and distressing barriers to providing effective MND care.

Significance of results: This study demonstrates that MD is experienced by healthcare professionals working with MND across Europe. MD was associated with reduced professional quality of life and increased intentions to leave or change positions, underscoring its potential implications for workforce retention and sustainability. The findings show that system/organization, patient/condition and family-level causes are the primary drivers of MD in this population. Future research should focus on evaluating the effectiveness of interventions designed to address these key drivers and mitigate the impact of MD among healthcare professionals working with MND.

运动神经元疾病医护人员的道德困扰。
目的:(1)确定可能导致运动神经元疾病(MND)专业人员道德困扰(MD)经历的临床情况;(2)测量MD的发生和强度;(3)探索职业生活质量、离职意向以及相关风险和/或保护因素之间的关系。方法:一项横断面在线调查被分发给在欧洲MND服务工作的医疗保健专业人员。数据分析采用描述性和推断性统计。结果:本次国际调查共分析了来自17个欧洲国家的230名专业人士的回答。67%的受访者表示,MD与他们与MND合作的经历产生了共鸣。那些由于照顾这些患者群体所面临的挑战而考虑离开或改变工作岗位的人也更有可能报告与MD有共鸣(χ2 = 7.772, p = 0.020)。MD的强度与职业生活质量的降低(倦怠)相关[β = 0.106, p]。结果的意义:本研究表明,在欧洲,从事MND工作的医疗保健专业人员都经历过MD。MD与职业生活质量下降、离职或换工作的意愿增加有关,强调了其对劳动力保留和可持续性的潜在影响。研究结果表明,系统/组织、患者/状况和家庭层面的原因是这一人群中MD的主要驱动因素。未来的研究应侧重于评估旨在解决这些关键驱动因素的干预措施的有效性,并减轻MD对从事MND工作的医疗保健专业人员的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Palliative & Supportive Care
Palliative & Supportive Care HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES-
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
9.10%
发文量
280
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书