Health literacy and its associated factors among older adults in Taiwan: The role of media use and healthcare experience.

IF 2.4 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Tzu Chi Medical Journal Pub Date : 2026-01-12 eCollection Date: 2026-07-01 DOI:10.4103/tcmj.tcmj_217_25
Jyh-Gang Hsieh, Mi-Hsiu Wei, Ying-Wei Wang, Jui-Hung Yu, Shiao-Chi Wu, Mei-Chuan Chang
{"title":"Health literacy and its associated factors among older adults in Taiwan: The role of media use and healthcare experience.","authors":"Jyh-Gang Hsieh, Mi-Hsiu Wei, Ying-Wei Wang, Jui-Hung Yu, Shiao-Chi Wu, Mei-Chuan Chang","doi":"10.4103/tcmj.tcmj_217_25","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aimed to assess the level of health literacy among older adults in Taiwan and to examine the predictive roles of media use, perceived healthcare experiences, and social support.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A cross-sectional survey was conducted with 335 adults aged 65 years and older between July 2016 and December 2016. Data were collected through structured face-to-face interviews using the validated instruments. Health literacy was assessed using the Mandarin Multidimensional Health Literacy Questionnaire; media use was measured by the frequency of traditional (e.g., TV and newspapers) and digital (e.g., Internet and social media) health information access; healthcare experiences were evaluated based on perceptions of organizational health literacy; and health-related social support was measured via perceived support from family and friends. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics and hierarchical multiple regression analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, 69.3% of participants exhibited limited health literacy, with the appraisal domain being the weakest (66.3% limited). Significant differences in health literacy were observed by gender, educational attainment, traditional and digital media use, and perceived healthcare experience (all <i>P</i> < 0.001). Hierarchical regression analysis identified traditional media use (β = 0.333), digital media use (β = 0.215), and perceived healthcare experience (β = 0.165) as significant predictors, increasing the explained variance from 12.1% to 35.3%. Social support was not a significant predictor.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Media use and favorable healthcare experiences were positively associated with health literacy in older adults. Future interventions should improve access to traditional and digital media and foster health-literate environments to mitigate disparities in aging populations.</p>","PeriodicalId":45873,"journal":{"name":"Tzu Chi Medical Journal","volume":"38 3","pages":"415-422"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-01-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13367645/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tzu Chi Medical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/tcmj.tcmj_217_25","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/7/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: This study aimed to assess the level of health literacy among older adults in Taiwan and to examine the predictive roles of media use, perceived healthcare experiences, and social support.

Materials and methods: A cross-sectional survey was conducted with 335 adults aged 65 years and older between July 2016 and December 2016. Data were collected through structured face-to-face interviews using the validated instruments. Health literacy was assessed using the Mandarin Multidimensional Health Literacy Questionnaire; media use was measured by the frequency of traditional (e.g., TV and newspapers) and digital (e.g., Internet and social media) health information access; healthcare experiences were evaluated based on perceptions of organizational health literacy; and health-related social support was measured via perceived support from family and friends. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics and hierarchical multiple regression analysis.

Results: Overall, 69.3% of participants exhibited limited health literacy, with the appraisal domain being the weakest (66.3% limited). Significant differences in health literacy were observed by gender, educational attainment, traditional and digital media use, and perceived healthcare experience (all P < 0.001). Hierarchical regression analysis identified traditional media use (β = 0.333), digital media use (β = 0.215), and perceived healthcare experience (β = 0.165) as significant predictors, increasing the explained variance from 12.1% to 35.3%. Social support was not a significant predictor.

Conclusion: Media use and favorable healthcare experiences were positively associated with health literacy in older adults. Future interventions should improve access to traditional and digital media and foster health-literate environments to mitigate disparities in aging populations.

台湾老年人健康素养及其相关因素:媒体使用与医疗保健经验的作用。
摘要目的:本研究旨在评估台湾老年人健康素养水平,并探讨媒体使用、医疗体验感知与社会支持的预测作用。材料与方法:于2016年7月至2016年12月对335名65岁及以上的成年人进行横断面调查。数据通过结构化的面对面访谈收集,使用经过验证的工具。采用普通话多维健康素养问卷对健康素养进行评估;通过传统(如电视和报纸)和数字(如互联网和社交媒体)健康信息获取的频率来衡量媒体使用情况;根据组织健康素养的认知评估医疗保健经验;与健康相关的社会支持是通过来自家人和朋友的感知支持来衡量的。数据分析采用描述性统计和层次多元回归分析。结果:总体而言,69.3%的参与者表现出有限的健康素养,其中评价领域最弱(66.3%有限)。健康素养在性别、受教育程度、传统和数字媒体使用以及感知的医疗保健经验方面存在显著差异(均P < 0.001)。分层回归分析发现,传统媒体使用(β = 0.333)、数字媒体使用(β = 0.215)和感知医疗体验(β = 0.165)是显著的预测因子,解释方差从12.1%增加到35.3%。社会支持不是显著的预测因子。结论:媒体使用和良好的医疗保健经历与老年人健康素养呈正相关。未来的干预措施应改善对传统媒体和数字媒体的获取,并营造健康知识环境,以减轻老龄化人口中的差距。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Tzu Chi Medical Journal
Tzu Chi Medical Journal MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
44
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊介绍: The Tzu Chi Medical Journal is the peer-reviewed publication of the Buddhist Compassion Relief Tzu Chi Foundation, and includes original research papers on clinical medicine and basic science, case reports, clinical pathological pages, and review articles.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书