Multi-Sectoral Partnerships for Physical Literacy: Setting the Scene for Evaluation.

IF 1.5 Q3 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Chelsea Pelletier, Caroline Wu, Guy Faulkner, Patti-Jean Naylor
{"title":"Multi-Sectoral Partnerships for Physical Literacy: Setting the Scene for Evaluation.","authors":"Chelsea Pelletier, Caroline Wu, Guy Faulkner, Patti-Jean Naylor","doi":"10.1177/15248399261460357","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The physical literacy for communities (PL4C) project aimed to promote physical literacy using a participatory community mobilization approach; organizing multi-sectoral community-led tables that developed and promoted physical literacy initiatives. As part of a scale-up across Canada, we set out to design an evaluation protocol to assess the effectiveness of the PL4C intervention that was aligned with table processes and activities. We conducted interviews with members of two original community tables that would then serve as exemplar communities for the scale-up evaluation with the goal of understanding: (1) how the existing PL4C intervention functioned; and (2) the promotion of physical literacy in these communities. Through qualitative interviews with 13 (11 women) existing PL4C table members, we identified three broad categories: working together, sustainability, and promoting physical literacy in different settings. Participants identified several areas important for evaluation of PL4C scale-up and implementation, including unpacking partnership operations and capacity building, supporting and understanding the sustainability of multi-sectoral action, and measuring the effectiveness of physical literacy program delivery. We used findings from these interviews to design an evaluation of the PL4C intervention that included milestone tracking, interviews and surveys with table members and community leaders, and direct measures of physical literacy alongside school and community-based physical literacy interventions being delivered in exemplar communities.</p>","PeriodicalId":47956,"journal":{"name":"Health Promotion Practice","volume":" ","pages":"15248399261460357"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Promotion Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15248399261460357","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The physical literacy for communities (PL4C) project aimed to promote physical literacy using a participatory community mobilization approach; organizing multi-sectoral community-led tables that developed and promoted physical literacy initiatives. As part of a scale-up across Canada, we set out to design an evaluation protocol to assess the effectiveness of the PL4C intervention that was aligned with table processes and activities. We conducted interviews with members of two original community tables that would then serve as exemplar communities for the scale-up evaluation with the goal of understanding: (1) how the existing PL4C intervention functioned; and (2) the promotion of physical literacy in these communities. Through qualitative interviews with 13 (11 women) existing PL4C table members, we identified three broad categories: working together, sustainability, and promoting physical literacy in different settings. Participants identified several areas important for evaluation of PL4C scale-up and implementation, including unpacking partnership operations and capacity building, supporting and understanding the sustainability of multi-sectoral action, and measuring the effectiveness of physical literacy program delivery. We used findings from these interviews to design an evaluation of the PL4C intervention that included milestone tracking, interviews and surveys with table members and community leaders, and direct measures of physical literacy alongside school and community-based physical literacy interventions being delivered in exemplar communities.

体育素养的多部门伙伴关系:为评估奠定基础。
社区体育扫盲(PL4C)项目旨在通过参与式社区动员方法促进体育扫盲;组织多部门社区领导的会议,发展和促进体育扫盲活动。作为在加拿大扩大规模的一部分,我们开始设计一个评估方案,以评估与表流程和活动相一致的PL4C干预的有效性。我们对两个原始社区表的成员进行了访谈,然后作为扩展评估的范例社区,目的是了解:(1)现有的PL4C干预如何发挥作用;(2)促进这些社区的体育素养。通过对13名现有PL4C表成员(11名女性)的定性访谈,我们确定了三大类:合作、可持续性和在不同环境中促进体育素养。与会者确定了对评估PL4C的扩大和实施具有重要意义的几个领域,包括分析伙伴关系运作和能力建设,支持和理解多部门行动的可持续性,以及衡量体育扫盲项目实施的有效性。我们利用这些访谈的结果设计了PL4C干预措施的评估,其中包括里程碑跟踪、对表成员和社区领导人的访谈和调查,以及在示范社区提供的学校和社区体育素养干预措施的同时,对体育素养进行直接测量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Health Promotion Practice
Health Promotion Practice PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
5.30%
发文量
126
期刊介绍: Health Promotion Practice (HPP) publishes authoritative articles devoted to the practical application of health promotion and education. It publishes information of strategic importance to a broad base of professionals engaged in the practice of developing, implementing, and evaluating health promotion and disease prevention programs. The journal"s editorial board is committed to focusing on the applications of health promotion and public health education interventions, programs and best practice strategies in various settings, including but not limited to, community, health care, worksite, educational, and international settings. Additionally, the journal focuses on the development and application of public policy conducive to the promotion of health and prevention of disease.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书