Implementing an early supported discharge intervention to nursing homes and respite care centers after hip fracture: A qualitative study of staff experiences and field observations

IF 1.8 Q3 NURSING
Mads S. Nielsen, Ditte B. Jepsen, Frede Frihagen, Bjarke L. Viberg, Charlotte M. Jensen
{"title":"Implementing an early supported discharge intervention to nursing homes and respite care centers after hip fracture: A qualitative study of staff experiences and field observations","authors":"Mads S. Nielsen,&nbsp;Ditte B. Jepsen,&nbsp;Frede Frihagen,&nbsp;Bjarke L. Viberg,&nbsp;Charlotte M. Jensen","doi":"10.1016/j.ijotn.2026.101301","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>An enhanced standardized interdisciplinary cooperation (ESIC) model was introduced to improve collaboration between hospitals, nursing homes and respite care centers (NH-RCC) after hip fracture. It involved structured post-discharge care and 2-week extended hospital care, requiring new collaborative practices whose success depended on how NH-RCC staff perceived and enacted the intervention.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>An ethnographically inspired design was applied, combining field observations and semi-structured interviews with Health and Social Care Personnel (HSCP) in 10 NH-RCCs until saturation was reached. Observations followed Spradley's nine-domain framework. Interview data were analyzed using Braun and Clarke's thematic analysis within a hermeneutic framework. Observational findings were used to assess alignment.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Twelve interviews (8-33 min) and 180 h of observations were conducted. Participants were NH-RCC nurses (n = 7), outreach nurses (n = 3), and social and health care assistants (n = 2).</div><div>Four overarching themes revealed dualistic findings. The use of Early Warning Score was integrated into daily routines (Theme 1, <em>Normalization of the intervention in everyday practice)</em> and supported a broader clinical view of residents (Theme 2, <em>Clinical awareness, ethics and relational care)</em>. However, some nurses experienced a problematic shift from direct care towards documentation (Theme 3, <em>Role restructuring and coordination work).</em> Mobilization was often omitted in vulnerable residents. Also, incomplete discharges and project tasks were a source of frustration (Theme 4, <em>Systemic constraints and safety vulnerabilities).</em></div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>We found that an ESIC model can be integrated into NH-RCC routines and enhance HSCPs clinical awareness. However, professional roles and prioritization of mobilization need clearer alignment between clinical goals and practice.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":45099,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Orthopaedic and Trauma Nursing","volume":"62 ","pages":"Article 101301"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Orthopaedic and Trauma Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1878124126000468","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/7/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

An enhanced standardized interdisciplinary cooperation (ESIC) model was introduced to improve collaboration between hospitals, nursing homes and respite care centers (NH-RCC) after hip fracture. It involved structured post-discharge care and 2-week extended hospital care, requiring new collaborative practices whose success depended on how NH-RCC staff perceived and enacted the intervention.

Methods

An ethnographically inspired design was applied, combining field observations and semi-structured interviews with Health and Social Care Personnel (HSCP) in 10 NH-RCCs until saturation was reached. Observations followed Spradley's nine-domain framework. Interview data were analyzed using Braun and Clarke's thematic analysis within a hermeneutic framework. Observational findings were used to assess alignment.

Results

Twelve interviews (8-33 min) and 180 h of observations were conducted. Participants were NH-RCC nurses (n = 7), outreach nurses (n = 3), and social and health care assistants (n = 2).
Four overarching themes revealed dualistic findings. The use of Early Warning Score was integrated into daily routines (Theme 1, Normalization of the intervention in everyday practice) and supported a broader clinical view of residents (Theme 2, Clinical awareness, ethics and relational care). However, some nurses experienced a problematic shift from direct care towards documentation (Theme 3, Role restructuring and coordination work). Mobilization was often omitted in vulnerable residents. Also, incomplete discharges and project tasks were a source of frustration (Theme 4, Systemic constraints and safety vulnerabilities).

Conclusion

We found that an ESIC model can be integrated into NH-RCC routines and enhance HSCPs clinical awareness. However, professional roles and prioritization of mobilization need clearer alignment between clinical goals and practice.
髋部骨折后在疗养院和临时护理中心实施早期支持出院干预:工作人员经验和实地观察的定性研究。
背景:为改善髋部骨折后医院、疗养院和暂息护理中心(NH-RCC)之间的合作,引入了一种增强的标准化跨学科合作(ESIC)模式。它涉及结构化的出院后护理和2周的延长住院护理,需要新的协作实践,其成功取决于NH-RCC员工如何感知和实施干预。方法:采用民族志启发设计,结合现场观察和对10个nh - rcc的卫生和社会护理人员(HSCP)的半结构化访谈,直到达到饱和。观察遵循Spradley的九域框架。访谈数据采用Braun和Clarke在解释学框架内的主题分析进行分析。观察结果用于评估对齐。结果:访谈12次(8-33 min),观察时间180 h。参与者是NH-RCC护士(n = 7),外展护士(n = 3)和社会和卫生保健助理(n = 2)。四个总体主题揭示了二元性的发现。早期预警评分的使用被整合到日常生活中(主题1,干预在日常实践中的规范化),并支持住院医师更广泛的临床观点(主题2,临床意识、伦理和关系护理)。然而,一些护士经历了从直接护理到记录的问题转变(主题3,角色重组和协调工作)。对弱势居民的动员往往被忽略。此外,不完整的排放和项目任务也是挫败感的来源(主题4,系统约束和安全漏洞)。结论:我们发现ESIC模型可以整合到NH-RCC常规中,提高HSCPs的临床意识。然而,专业角色和动员的优先次序需要在临床目标和实践之间更明确地协调一致。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
14.30%
发文量
34
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书