Aaron Ling, Evangeline Samuel, Rahini Mahendran, John Zalcberg, Rob G Stirling
{"title":"Molecular-Based Risk Prediction Models for Recurrence After Curative Treatment of Early-Stage Lung Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.","authors":"Aaron Ling, Evangeline Samuel, Rahini Mahendran, John Zalcberg, Rob G Stirling","doi":"10.1111/1759-7714.70345","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Recurrence after curative treatment remains a major challenge in early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Molecular-based prediction models may improve risk stratification and support personalized surveillance strategies. To identify and evaluate molecular-based risk prediction models for recurrence and survival following curative treatment of early-stage NSCLC. A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted in accordance with PRISMA guidelines and a published PROSPERO protocol. MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library were searched for studies published between January 2000 and December 2023. Eligible studies reported performance metrics of molecular-based models predicting recurrence-free survival, cancer-specific survival, or overall survival following curative treatment for NSCLC. Data extraction was performed using the CHARMS framework, risk of bias was assessed using PROBAST, and model performance metrics were pooled using random-effects meta-analysis. Of 2447 records identified, five studies met the inclusion criteria. All models used Cox proportional hazards regression. Molecular predictors included mRNA expression profiles (n = 3), long noncoding RNAs (n = 1), and DNA methylation biomarkers (n = 1). Internal validation studies reported AUC values ranging from 0.66 to 0.89, with a pooled AUC of 0.77 (95% CI = 0.66-0.90; I<sup>2</sup> = 88.4%). Two externally validated models reported AUC values of 0.68-0.74, with a pooled AUC of 0.72 (95% CI = 0.68-0.75; I<sup>2</sup> = 0%). Two studies were considered high risk of bias due to inappropriate handling of missing data. Molecular-based prediction models demonstrate moderate-to-good discriminative performance for recurrence and survival in early-stage NSCLC. However, broader external validation and improved methodological rigor are required before routine clinical implementation. Trial Registration: PROSPERO identifier: CRD42024599641.</p>","PeriodicalId":23338,"journal":{"name":"Thoracic Cancer","volume":"17 14","pages":"e70345"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13370203/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Thoracic Cancer","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/1759-7714.70345","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Recurrence after curative treatment remains a major challenge in early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Molecular-based prediction models may improve risk stratification and support personalized surveillance strategies. To identify and evaluate molecular-based risk prediction models for recurrence and survival following curative treatment of early-stage NSCLC. A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted in accordance with PRISMA guidelines and a published PROSPERO protocol. MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library were searched for studies published between January 2000 and December 2023. Eligible studies reported performance metrics of molecular-based models predicting recurrence-free survival, cancer-specific survival, or overall survival following curative treatment for NSCLC. Data extraction was performed using the CHARMS framework, risk of bias was assessed using PROBAST, and model performance metrics were pooled using random-effects meta-analysis. Of 2447 records identified, five studies met the inclusion criteria. All models used Cox proportional hazards regression. Molecular predictors included mRNA expression profiles (n = 3), long noncoding RNAs (n = 1), and DNA methylation biomarkers (n = 1). Internal validation studies reported AUC values ranging from 0.66 to 0.89, with a pooled AUC of 0.77 (95% CI = 0.66-0.90; I2 = 88.4%). Two externally validated models reported AUC values of 0.68-0.74, with a pooled AUC of 0.72 (95% CI = 0.68-0.75; I2 = 0%). Two studies were considered high risk of bias due to inappropriate handling of missing data. Molecular-based prediction models demonstrate moderate-to-good discriminative performance for recurrence and survival in early-stage NSCLC. However, broader external validation and improved methodological rigor are required before routine clinical implementation. Trial Registration: PROSPERO identifier: CRD42024599641.
期刊介绍:
Thoracic Cancer aims to facilitate international collaboration and exchange of comprehensive and cutting-edge information on basic, translational, and applied clinical research in lung cancer, esophageal cancer, mediastinal cancer, breast cancer and other thoracic malignancies. Prevention, treatment and research relevant to Asia-Pacific is a focus area, but submissions from all regions are welcomed. The editors encourage contributions relevant to prevention, general thoracic surgery, medical oncology, radiology, radiation medicine, pathology, basic cancer research, as well as epidemiological and translational studies in thoracic cancer. Thoracic Cancer is the official publication of the Chinese Society of Lung Cancer, International Chinese Society of Thoracic Surgery and is endorsed by the Korean Association for the Study of Lung Cancer and the Hong Kong Cancer Therapy Society.
The Journal publishes a range of article types including: Editorials, Invited Reviews, Mini Reviews, Original Articles, Clinical Guidelines, Technological Notes, Imaging in thoracic cancer, Meeting Reports, Case Reports, Letters to the Editor, Commentaries, and Brief Reports.