Molecular-Based Risk Prediction Models for Recurrence After Curative Treatment of Early-Stage Lung Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q3 ONCOLOGY
Aaron Ling, Evangeline Samuel, Rahini Mahendran, John Zalcberg, Rob G Stirling
{"title":"Molecular-Based Risk Prediction Models for Recurrence After Curative Treatment of Early-Stage Lung Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.","authors":"Aaron Ling, Evangeline Samuel, Rahini Mahendran, John Zalcberg, Rob G Stirling","doi":"10.1111/1759-7714.70345","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Recurrence after curative treatment remains a major challenge in early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Molecular-based prediction models may improve risk stratification and support personalized surveillance strategies. To identify and evaluate molecular-based risk prediction models for recurrence and survival following curative treatment of early-stage NSCLC. A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted in accordance with PRISMA guidelines and a published PROSPERO protocol. MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library were searched for studies published between January 2000 and December 2023. Eligible studies reported performance metrics of molecular-based models predicting recurrence-free survival, cancer-specific survival, or overall survival following curative treatment for NSCLC. Data extraction was performed using the CHARMS framework, risk of bias was assessed using PROBAST, and model performance metrics were pooled using random-effects meta-analysis. Of 2447 records identified, five studies met the inclusion criteria. All models used Cox proportional hazards regression. Molecular predictors included mRNA expression profiles (n = 3), long noncoding RNAs (n = 1), and DNA methylation biomarkers (n = 1). Internal validation studies reported AUC values ranging from 0.66 to 0.89, with a pooled AUC of 0.77 (95% CI = 0.66-0.90; I<sup>2</sup> = 88.4%). Two externally validated models reported AUC values of 0.68-0.74, with a pooled AUC of 0.72 (95% CI = 0.68-0.75; I<sup>2</sup> = 0%). Two studies were considered high risk of bias due to inappropriate handling of missing data. Molecular-based prediction models demonstrate moderate-to-good discriminative performance for recurrence and survival in early-stage NSCLC. However, broader external validation and improved methodological rigor are required before routine clinical implementation. Trial Registration: PROSPERO identifier: CRD42024599641.</p>","PeriodicalId":23338,"journal":{"name":"Thoracic Cancer","volume":"17 14","pages":"e70345"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13370203/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Thoracic Cancer","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/1759-7714.70345","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Recurrence after curative treatment remains a major challenge in early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Molecular-based prediction models may improve risk stratification and support personalized surveillance strategies. To identify and evaluate molecular-based risk prediction models for recurrence and survival following curative treatment of early-stage NSCLC. A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted in accordance with PRISMA guidelines and a published PROSPERO protocol. MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library were searched for studies published between January 2000 and December 2023. Eligible studies reported performance metrics of molecular-based models predicting recurrence-free survival, cancer-specific survival, or overall survival following curative treatment for NSCLC. Data extraction was performed using the CHARMS framework, risk of bias was assessed using PROBAST, and model performance metrics were pooled using random-effects meta-analysis. Of 2447 records identified, five studies met the inclusion criteria. All models used Cox proportional hazards regression. Molecular predictors included mRNA expression profiles (n = 3), long noncoding RNAs (n = 1), and DNA methylation biomarkers (n = 1). Internal validation studies reported AUC values ranging from 0.66 to 0.89, with a pooled AUC of 0.77 (95% CI = 0.66-0.90; I2 = 88.4%). Two externally validated models reported AUC values of 0.68-0.74, with a pooled AUC of 0.72 (95% CI = 0.68-0.75; I2 = 0%). Two studies were considered high risk of bias due to inappropriate handling of missing data. Molecular-based prediction models demonstrate moderate-to-good discriminative performance for recurrence and survival in early-stage NSCLC. However, broader external validation and improved methodological rigor are required before routine clinical implementation. Trial Registration: PROSPERO identifier: CRD42024599641.

基于分子的早期肺癌治愈后复发风险预测模型:一项系统综述和荟萃分析。
治疗后复发仍然是早期非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)的主要挑战。基于分子的预测模型可以改善风险分层和支持个性化监测策略。识别和评估早期非小细胞肺癌根治性治疗后复发和生存的分子风险预测模型。根据PRISMA指南和已发表的PROSPERO方案进行了系统评价和荟萃分析。检索了MEDLINE、EMBASE和Cochrane图书馆2000年1月至2023年12月间发表的研究。符合条件的研究报告了基于分子模型的性能指标,预测非小细胞肺癌根治性治疗后的无复发生存、癌症特异性生存或总生存。使用CHARMS框架进行数据提取,使用PROBAST评估偏倚风险,使用随机效应荟萃分析汇总模型性能指标。在确定的2447条记录中,有5项研究符合纳入标准。所有模型均采用Cox比例风险回归。分子预测因子包括mRNA表达谱(n = 3)、长链非编码rna (n = 1)和DNA甲基化生物标志物(n = 1)。内部验证研究报告的AUC值为0.66 ~ 0.89,合并AUC为0.77 (95% CI = 0.66 ~ 0.90; I2 = 88.4%)。两个外部验证模型报告的AUC值为0.68-0.74,合并AUC为0.72 (95% CI = 0.68-0.75; I2 = 0%)。由于对缺失数据处理不当,两项研究被认为存在高偏倚风险。基于分子的预测模型对早期非小细胞肺癌的复发和生存具有中等到良好的判别性能。然而,在常规临床实施之前,需要更广泛的外部验证和改进的方法严谨性。试验注册:PROSPERO标识符:CRD42024599641。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Thoracic Cancer
Thoracic Cancer ONCOLOGY-RESPIRATORY SYSTEM
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
3.40%
发文量
439
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Thoracic Cancer aims to facilitate international collaboration and exchange of comprehensive and cutting-edge information on basic, translational, and applied clinical research in lung cancer, esophageal cancer, mediastinal cancer, breast cancer and other thoracic malignancies. Prevention, treatment and research relevant to Asia-Pacific is a focus area, but submissions from all regions are welcomed. The editors encourage contributions relevant to prevention, general thoracic surgery, medical oncology, radiology, radiation medicine, pathology, basic cancer research, as well as epidemiological and translational studies in thoracic cancer. Thoracic Cancer is the official publication of the Chinese Society of Lung Cancer, International Chinese Society of Thoracic Surgery and is endorsed by the Korean Association for the Study of Lung Cancer and the Hong Kong Cancer Therapy Society. The Journal publishes a range of article types including: Editorials, Invited Reviews, Mini Reviews, Original Articles, Clinical Guidelines, Technological Notes, Imaging in thoracic cancer, Meeting Reports, Case Reports, Letters to the Editor, Commentaries, and Brief Reports.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书