The role of artificial intelligence in equine colic: A scoping review of diagnostic, prognostic, and decision-support applications

IF 2.7 2区 农林科学 Q1 VETERINARY SCIENCES
Veterinary journal Pub Date : 2026-08-01 Epub Date: 2026-07-14 DOI:10.1016/j.tvjl.2026.106781
Yu Gao, Zijun Luo, Zhixiang Dong, Shumin Li
{"title":"The role of artificial intelligence in equine colic: A scoping review of diagnostic, prognostic, and decision-support applications","authors":"Yu Gao,&nbsp;Zijun Luo,&nbsp;Zhixiang Dong,&nbsp;Shumin Li","doi":"10.1016/j.tvjl.2026.106781","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Equine colic, strangulating colic in particular, remains one of the leading causes of mortality in horses, with timely diagnosis and accurate prognostic assessment being critical for clinical decision-making. In recent years, artificial intelligence (AI) has been increasingly applied to support diagnostic and prognostic evaluation in veterinary medicine. However, the scope, methodological characteristics, and performance of AI models in equine colic have not been systematically mapped. Therefore, this scoping review was conducted to summarize current AI applications in equine colic, identify commonly used algorithms, describe reported performance metrics, and highlight methodological gaps affecting clinical translation. 16 studies published between 2015 and 2025 were included, comprising 104 AI models applied to equine colic. Most models focused on prognostic prediction, particularly survival outcome prediction. Logistic regression was the most frequently used method, followed by random forest (RF) and other ensemble approaches. Across studies, RF generally demonstrated strong discriminative performance for survival prediction, with reported area under the curve values ranging from 0.79 to 0.99 and accuracy often exceeding 80%. However, external validation, calibration assessment, and standardized preprocessing strategies were infrequently reported. Limited handling of class imbalance and inconsistent reporting practices further reduced reproducibility and generalizability. Findings highlight that AI applications demonstrate promising potential for prognostic prediction and clinical decision-making in equine colic, but important methodological barriers remain. Future research should emphasize multicenter collaboration, external validation, calibration assessment, standardized reporting frameworks, imbalance-management strategies, explainable AI integration, and multimodal monitoring systems to facilitate clinical translation of AI tools in equine practice.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":23505,"journal":{"name":"Veterinary journal","volume":"318 ","pages":"Article 106781"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Veterinary journal","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1090023326002376","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/7/14 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"VETERINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Equine colic, strangulating colic in particular, remains one of the leading causes of mortality in horses, with timely diagnosis and accurate prognostic assessment being critical for clinical decision-making. In recent years, artificial intelligence (AI) has been increasingly applied to support diagnostic and prognostic evaluation in veterinary medicine. However, the scope, methodological characteristics, and performance of AI models in equine colic have not been systematically mapped. Therefore, this scoping review was conducted to summarize current AI applications in equine colic, identify commonly used algorithms, describe reported performance metrics, and highlight methodological gaps affecting clinical translation. 16 studies published between 2015 and 2025 were included, comprising 104 AI models applied to equine colic. Most models focused on prognostic prediction, particularly survival outcome prediction. Logistic regression was the most frequently used method, followed by random forest (RF) and other ensemble approaches. Across studies, RF generally demonstrated strong discriminative performance for survival prediction, with reported area under the curve values ranging from 0.79 to 0.99 and accuracy often exceeding 80%. However, external validation, calibration assessment, and standardized preprocessing strategies were infrequently reported. Limited handling of class imbalance and inconsistent reporting practices further reduced reproducibility and generalizability. Findings highlight that AI applications demonstrate promising potential for prognostic prediction and clinical decision-making in equine colic, but important methodological barriers remain. Future research should emphasize multicenter collaboration, external validation, calibration assessment, standardized reporting frameworks, imbalance-management strategies, explainable AI integration, and multimodal monitoring systems to facilitate clinical translation of AI tools in equine practice.
人工智能在马绞痛中的作用:诊断、预后和决策支持应用的范围审查。
马绞痛仍然是马死亡的主要原因之一,及时诊断和准确的预后评估对临床决策至关重要。近年来,人工智能(AI)越来越多地应用于支持兽医诊断和预后评估。然而,人工智能模型在马绞痛中的范围、方法特征和性能尚未被系统地绘制出来。因此,本综述旨在总结当前人工智能在马绞痛中的应用,确定常用算法,描述报告的性能指标,并强调影响临床翻译的方法学差距。纳入了2015年至2025年间发表的16项研究,包括104个应用于马绞痛的人工智能模型。大多数模型侧重于预后预测,特别是生存结果预测。逻辑回归是最常用的方法,其次是随机森林(RF)和集成方法。在所有研究中,RF通常在生存预测方面表现出很强的判别性能,报告的曲线下面积值在0.79至0.99之间,准确率通常超过80%。然而,外部验证、校准评估和标准化预处理策略很少被报道。有限的类不平衡处理和不一致的报告实践进一步降低了再现性和泛化性。研究结果强调,人工智能应用在马绞痛的预后预测和临床决策方面显示出很大的潜力,但仍然存在重要的方法障碍。未来的研究应强调多中心协作、外部验证、校准评估、标准化报告框架、失衡管理策略、可解释的人工智能集成和多模式监测系统,以促进人工智能工具在马实践中的临床转化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Veterinary journal
Veterinary journal 农林科学-兽医学
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
4.50%
发文量
79
审稿时长
40 days
期刊介绍: The Veterinary Journal (established 1875) publishes worldwide contributions on all aspects of veterinary science and its related subjects. It provides regular book reviews and a short communications section. The journal regularly commissions topical reviews and commentaries on features of major importance. Research areas include infectious diseases, applied biochemistry, parasitology, endocrinology, microbiology, immunology, pathology, pharmacology, physiology, molecular biology, immunogenetics, surgery, ophthalmology, dermatology and oncology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书