[Fibromyalgia syndrome-Is the designation as a disorder of women a misinterpretation?]

IF 0.8 4区 医学 Q3 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Schmerz Pub Date : 2026-08-01 Epub Date: 2026-07-15 DOI:10.1007/s00482-026-00957-2
Simran Jeet Kaur, Christin Breidenbach, Nurcan Üçeyler
{"title":"[Fibromyalgia syndrome-Is the designation as a disorder of women a misinterpretation?]","authors":"Simran Jeet Kaur, Christin Breidenbach, Nurcan Üçeyler","doi":"10.1007/s00482-026-00957-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Fibromyalgia syndrome (FMS) is a chronic pain condition accompanied by further characteristic key symptoms, such as sleep disturbance and fatigue. According to the literature it is often reported to be more frequent in women but the true sex-specific prevalence remains uncertain and potential underlying mechanisms are unknown.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To determine the prevalence of FMS in women and men and assess whether the clinical phenotype differs; if so, to consider possible contributing factors.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>We conducted a literature search in PubMed from 1 February 1990 to 30 September 2025. Eligibility for inclusion in our systematic review was assessed by applying predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria during screening of titles and abstracts.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The search yielded 532 articles, of which 59 were included in the systematic review and among these were 5 animal experimental studies. Men with FMS were examined in 2/54 (3.7%) studies and direct sex comparisons were reported in 15/54 (27.7%). Under these conditions, the reported prevalence of FMS averaged 2.4-6.8% in women and 0.2-2.4% in men. The clinical phenotype was assessed across sexes in 7/54 (13%) studies; additionally, 2/54 (3.7%) cross-sectional studies included only women and 2/54 (3.7%) prospective cross-sectional studies included only men.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Current evidence suggests a higher FMS prevalence in women; however, most studies predominantly examined women, direct comparisons are scarce and no studies have investigated pathophysiological sex differences. Future research should address these knowledge gaps.</p>","PeriodicalId":21572,"journal":{"name":"Schmerz","volume":" ","pages":"270-276"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Schmerz","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00482-026-00957-2","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/7/15 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Fibromyalgia syndrome (FMS) is a chronic pain condition accompanied by further characteristic key symptoms, such as sleep disturbance and fatigue. According to the literature it is often reported to be more frequent in women but the true sex-specific prevalence remains uncertain and potential underlying mechanisms are unknown.

Objective: To determine the prevalence of FMS in women and men and assess whether the clinical phenotype differs; if so, to consider possible contributing factors.

Material and methods: We conducted a literature search in PubMed from 1 February 1990 to 30 September 2025. Eligibility for inclusion in our systematic review was assessed by applying predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria during screening of titles and abstracts.

Results: The search yielded 532 articles, of which 59 were included in the systematic review and among these were 5 animal experimental studies. Men with FMS were examined in 2/54 (3.7%) studies and direct sex comparisons were reported in 15/54 (27.7%). Under these conditions, the reported prevalence of FMS averaged 2.4-6.8% in women and 0.2-2.4% in men. The clinical phenotype was assessed across sexes in 7/54 (13%) studies; additionally, 2/54 (3.7%) cross-sectional studies included only women and 2/54 (3.7%) prospective cross-sectional studies included only men.

Conclusion: Current evidence suggests a higher FMS prevalence in women; however, most studies predominantly examined women, direct comparisons are scarce and no studies have investigated pathophysiological sex differences. Future research should address these knowledge gaps.

纤维肌痛综合征——将其定义为女性疾病是一种误解吗?]
背景:纤维肌痛综合征(FMS)是一种慢性疼痛疾病,并伴有睡眠障碍和疲劳等特征性关键症状。根据文献报道,这种疾病在女性中更为常见,但真正的性别特异性患病率仍不确定,潜在的潜在机制也未知。目的:确定FMS在女性和男性中的患病率,并评估临床表型是否不同;如果有,考虑可能的影响因素。材料和方法:我们在PubMed检索了1990年2月1日至2025年9月30日的文献。在筛选标题和摘要时,通过应用预定义的纳入和排除标准来评估纳入我们系统评价的资格。结果:共检索到532篇文献,纳入系统评价59篇,其中动物实验研究5篇。有2/54(3.7%)的研究检查了FMS男性,有15/54(27.7%)的研究报告了直接的性别比较。在这些条件下,报告的FMS患病率在女性中平均为2.4-6.8%,在男性中为0.2-2.4%。在7/54(13%)的研究中,临床表型是跨性别评估的;此外,2/54(3.7%)的横断面研究仅包括女性,2/54(3.7%)的前瞻性横断面研究仅包括男性。结论:目前的证据表明女性FMS患病率较高;然而,大多数研究主要针对女性,直接比较很少,也没有研究调查病理生理上的性别差异。未来的研究应该解决这些知识差距。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Schmerz
Schmerz 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
20.00%
发文量
64
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Der Schmerz is an internationally recognized journal and addresses all scientists, practitioners and psychologists, dealing with the treatment of pain patients or working in pain research. The aim of the journal is to enhance the treatment of pain patients in the long run. Review articles provide an overview on selected topics and offer the reader a summary of current findings from all fields of pain research, pain management and pain symptom management. Freely submitted original papers allow the presentation of important clinical studies and serve the scientific exchange. Case reports feature interesting cases and aim at optimizing diagnostic and therapeutic strategies. Review articles under the rubric ''Continuing Medical Education'' present verified results of scientific research and their integration into daily practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书