{"title":"[Fibromyalgia syndrome-Is the designation as a disorder of women a misinterpretation?]","authors":"Simran Jeet Kaur, Christin Breidenbach, Nurcan Üçeyler","doi":"10.1007/s00482-026-00957-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Fibromyalgia syndrome (FMS) is a chronic pain condition accompanied by further characteristic key symptoms, such as sleep disturbance and fatigue. According to the literature it is often reported to be more frequent in women but the true sex-specific prevalence remains uncertain and potential underlying mechanisms are unknown.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To determine the prevalence of FMS in women and men and assess whether the clinical phenotype differs; if so, to consider possible contributing factors.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>We conducted a literature search in PubMed from 1 February 1990 to 30 September 2025. Eligibility for inclusion in our systematic review was assessed by applying predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria during screening of titles and abstracts.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The search yielded 532 articles, of which 59 were included in the systematic review and among these were 5 animal experimental studies. Men with FMS were examined in 2/54 (3.7%) studies and direct sex comparisons were reported in 15/54 (27.7%). Under these conditions, the reported prevalence of FMS averaged 2.4-6.8% in women and 0.2-2.4% in men. The clinical phenotype was assessed across sexes in 7/54 (13%) studies; additionally, 2/54 (3.7%) cross-sectional studies included only women and 2/54 (3.7%) prospective cross-sectional studies included only men.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Current evidence suggests a higher FMS prevalence in women; however, most studies predominantly examined women, direct comparisons are scarce and no studies have investigated pathophysiological sex differences. Future research should address these knowledge gaps.</p>","PeriodicalId":21572,"journal":{"name":"Schmerz","volume":" ","pages":"270-276"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Schmerz","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00482-026-00957-2","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/7/15 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Fibromyalgia syndrome (FMS) is a chronic pain condition accompanied by further characteristic key symptoms, such as sleep disturbance and fatigue. According to the literature it is often reported to be more frequent in women but the true sex-specific prevalence remains uncertain and potential underlying mechanisms are unknown.
Objective: To determine the prevalence of FMS in women and men and assess whether the clinical phenotype differs; if so, to consider possible contributing factors.
Material and methods: We conducted a literature search in PubMed from 1 February 1990 to 30 September 2025. Eligibility for inclusion in our systematic review was assessed by applying predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria during screening of titles and abstracts.
Results: The search yielded 532 articles, of which 59 were included in the systematic review and among these were 5 animal experimental studies. Men with FMS were examined in 2/54 (3.7%) studies and direct sex comparisons were reported in 15/54 (27.7%). Under these conditions, the reported prevalence of FMS averaged 2.4-6.8% in women and 0.2-2.4% in men. The clinical phenotype was assessed across sexes in 7/54 (13%) studies; additionally, 2/54 (3.7%) cross-sectional studies included only women and 2/54 (3.7%) prospective cross-sectional studies included only men.
Conclusion: Current evidence suggests a higher FMS prevalence in women; however, most studies predominantly examined women, direct comparisons are scarce and no studies have investigated pathophysiological sex differences. Future research should address these knowledge gaps.
期刊介绍:
Der Schmerz is an internationally recognized journal and addresses all scientists, practitioners and psychologists, dealing with the treatment of pain patients or working in pain research. The aim of the journal is to enhance the treatment of pain patients in the long run.
Review articles provide an overview on selected topics and offer the reader a summary of current findings from all fields of pain research, pain management and pain symptom management.
Freely submitted original papers allow the presentation of important clinical studies and serve the scientific exchange.
Case reports feature interesting cases and aim at optimizing diagnostic and therapeutic strategies.
Review articles under the rubric ''Continuing Medical Education'' present verified results of scientific research and their integration into daily practice.