The increasing use of cognitive enhancing drugs by those with ADHD and neurotypical individuals: Societal demands, lifestyle preferences, and ethical issues.

IF 5.3 3区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Barbara J Sahakian, Christelle Langley
{"title":"The increasing use of cognitive enhancing drugs by those with ADHD and neurotypical individuals: Societal demands, lifestyle preferences, and ethical issues.","authors":"Barbara J Sahakian, Christelle Langley","doi":"10.1177/02698811261466620","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) is a highly heritable neurodevelopmental condition characterised by impairments in sustained attention, executive functioning, and emotional regulation, with significant lifelong consequences if untreated. Recent years have seen substantial increases in ADHD diagnoses and stimulant prescriptions across children, adolescents, and adults, alongside a parallel rise in the non-medical use of cognitive-enhancing drugs by neurotypical individuals. This review examines five key issues: factors driving rising ADHD diagnoses and prescriptions; the cognitive profile of ADHD and mechanisms of pharmacological treatments; reasons for increasing cognitive enhancer use in neurotypical populations; evidence for their efficacy in neurotypical individuals; and associated ethical implications. We review evidence implicating digital technology, parenting styles, educational incentives, and diagnostic practices in rising ADHD prevalence. Cognitive studies demonstrate that ADHD is associated with deficits in sustained attention, working memory, inhibitory control, and emotional regulation, underpinned by fronto-striatal dysfunction. Stimulant medications such as methylphenidate and lisdexamfetamine effectively improve 'cold' cognitive functions and change dysfuntional neural circuitry to a more typically developing pattern, though emotional dysregulation may persist. In neurotypical individuals, drugs such as methylphenidate and modafinil produce small-to-moderate improvements in cognition, particularly by increasing cognitive effort and motivation, with greatest benefits in those operating below optimal levels. However, their growing use raises ethical concerns regarding safety, fairness, coercion, and regulation. We argue that careful risk-benefit evaluation, long-term research studies, and informed policy are urgently needed to guide responsible use.</p>","PeriodicalId":16892,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Psychopharmacology","volume":" ","pages":"2698811261466620"},"PeriodicalIF":5.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Psychopharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/02698811261466620","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) is a highly heritable neurodevelopmental condition characterised by impairments in sustained attention, executive functioning, and emotional regulation, with significant lifelong consequences if untreated. Recent years have seen substantial increases in ADHD diagnoses and stimulant prescriptions across children, adolescents, and adults, alongside a parallel rise in the non-medical use of cognitive-enhancing drugs by neurotypical individuals. This review examines five key issues: factors driving rising ADHD diagnoses and prescriptions; the cognitive profile of ADHD and mechanisms of pharmacological treatments; reasons for increasing cognitive enhancer use in neurotypical populations; evidence for their efficacy in neurotypical individuals; and associated ethical implications. We review evidence implicating digital technology, parenting styles, educational incentives, and diagnostic practices in rising ADHD prevalence. Cognitive studies demonstrate that ADHD is associated with deficits in sustained attention, working memory, inhibitory control, and emotional regulation, underpinned by fronto-striatal dysfunction. Stimulant medications such as methylphenidate and lisdexamfetamine effectively improve 'cold' cognitive functions and change dysfuntional neural circuitry to a more typically developing pattern, though emotional dysregulation may persist. In neurotypical individuals, drugs such as methylphenidate and modafinil produce small-to-moderate improvements in cognition, particularly by increasing cognitive effort and motivation, with greatest benefits in those operating below optimal levels. However, their growing use raises ethical concerns regarding safety, fairness, coercion, and regulation. We argue that careful risk-benefit evaluation, long-term research studies, and informed policy are urgently needed to guide responsible use.

注意缺陷多动障碍患者和神经正常个体越来越多地使用认知增强药物:社会需求、生活方式偏好和伦理问题。
注意缺陷多动障碍(ADHD)是一种高度遗传性的神经发育疾病,其特征是持续注意力、执行功能和情绪调节的损害,如果不治疗,会造成严重的终身后果。近年来,在儿童、青少年和成人中,多动症的诊断和兴奋剂处方大幅增加,与此同时,神经正常个体对认知增强药物的非医疗使用也在增加。本综述探讨了五个关键问题:导致ADHD诊断和处方增加的因素;ADHD的认知特征和药物治疗机制;神经正常人群认知增强剂使用增加的原因;它们对神经正常个体有效的证据;以及相关的伦理问题。我们回顾了数字技术、父母教养方式、教育激励和ADHD患病率上升的诊断实践的证据。认知研究表明,多动症与持续注意力、工作记忆、抑制控制和情绪调节的缺陷有关,并以额纹状体功能障碍为基础。哌醋甲酯和利地安非他明等兴奋剂药物能有效改善“冷”认知功能,并将功能失调的神经回路转变为更典型的发展模式,但情绪失调可能会持续存在。在神经正常的个体中,哌醋甲酯和莫达非尼等药物对认知产生小到中度的改善,特别是通过增加认知努力和动机,对那些低于最佳水平的人有最大的好处。然而,它们越来越多的使用引发了关于安全、公平、强制和监管的伦理问题。我们认为,迫切需要仔细的风险-收益评估、长期研究和知情政策来指导负责任的使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Psychopharmacology
Journal of Psychopharmacology 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
8.60
自引率
4.90%
发文量
126
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Psychopharmacology is a fully peer-reviewed, international journal that publishes original research and review articles on preclinical and clinical aspects of psychopharmacology. The journal provides an essential forum for researchers and practicing clinicians on the effects of drugs on animal and human behavior, and the mechanisms underlying these effects. The Journal of Psychopharmacology is truly international in scope and readership.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书