An explanatory mixed-method study to unearth the cascade of events of implementation and coverage challenges of tuberculosis preventive treatment in two tribal-dominant districts of central India.

IF 1.1 Q4 PRIMARY HEALTH CARE
Manjula Singh, Akash R Singh, Vikrant Kabirpanthi, Somi Soni, Amber Kumar, Sanjeev Bakshi, Digvesh K Patel, Manjeet S Chalga
{"title":"An explanatory mixed-method study to unearth the cascade of events of implementation and coverage challenges of tuberculosis preventive treatment in two tribal-dominant districts of central India.","authors":"Manjula Singh, Akash R Singh, Vikrant Kabirpanthi, Somi Soni, Amber Kumar, Sanjeev Bakshi, Digvesh K Patel, Manjeet S Chalga","doi":"10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_1930_25","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Context: </strong>Tuberculosis preventive treatment (TPT) has the potential to achieve the greatest reduction in new TB cases as a single intervention in the high-burden countries like India.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>This study assessed the coverage and adherence of TPT among household child contacts (HHCC) aged <5 years in two resource-constrained districts and explored related health system and beneficiary-level barriers.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>An explanatory mixed-method design was adopted.</p><p><strong>Methods and material: </strong>The quantitative phase estimated TPT coverage and adherence through initiation and completion rates, followed by a qualitative phase to explore implementation challenges. Data were collected from 320 HHCC and eight programme stakeholders between November 2022 and March 2023.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 594 notified TB patients, 320 HHCC were identified and all were eligible for TPT. The initiation rate was 17.5% and completion rate 9.7%. Among non-initiators, 91% were uninformed and 8% considered TPT unnecessary. Around 7% discontinued treatment due to interrupted drug supply. Poor initiation was associated with specific TB Units, limited staff experience, and absence of home visits. Qualitative findings revealed key health system barriers such as ineffective training on TPT rationale, communication, lack of home visits, and <i>Nikshay</i> portal issues. Beneficiary related barriers included hesitancy, migration, misconceptions about TPT, and supply disruptions.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>TPT coverage and adherence among HHCC were suboptimal, with health system challenges outweighing beneficiary barriers. Strengthening staff training on TPT rationale effective communication, supervision along with ensuring consistent drug supply may prove essential to improve TPT implementation in resource-limited settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":15856,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Family Medicine and Primary Care","volume":"15 4","pages":"1680-1689"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13367600/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Family Medicine and Primary Care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_1930_25","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/5/23 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PRIMARY HEALTH CARE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Context: Tuberculosis preventive treatment (TPT) has the potential to achieve the greatest reduction in new TB cases as a single intervention in the high-burden countries like India.

Aims: This study assessed the coverage and adherence of TPT among household child contacts (HHCC) aged <5 years in two resource-constrained districts and explored related health system and beneficiary-level barriers.

Design: An explanatory mixed-method design was adopted.

Methods and material: The quantitative phase estimated TPT coverage and adherence through initiation and completion rates, followed by a qualitative phase to explore implementation challenges. Data were collected from 320 HHCC and eight programme stakeholders between November 2022 and March 2023.

Results: Of 594 notified TB patients, 320 HHCC were identified and all were eligible for TPT. The initiation rate was 17.5% and completion rate 9.7%. Among non-initiators, 91% were uninformed and 8% considered TPT unnecessary. Around 7% discontinued treatment due to interrupted drug supply. Poor initiation was associated with specific TB Units, limited staff experience, and absence of home visits. Qualitative findings revealed key health system barriers such as ineffective training on TPT rationale, communication, lack of home visits, and Nikshay portal issues. Beneficiary related barriers included hesitancy, migration, misconceptions about TPT, and supply disruptions.

Conclusions: TPT coverage and adherence among HHCC were suboptimal, with health system challenges outweighing beneficiary barriers. Strengthening staff training on TPT rationale effective communication, supervision along with ensuring consistent drug supply may prove essential to improve TPT implementation in resource-limited settings.

一项解释性混合方法研究,旨在揭示印度中部两个部落占主导地位的地区实施结核病预防治疗的级联事件和覆盖挑战。
背景:结核病预防治疗(TPT)作为一项单一干预措施,在印度等高负担国家有可能最大程度地减少新发结核病病例。目的:本研究评估家庭儿童接触者(HHCC)年龄的TPT覆盖率和依从性设计:采用解释性混合方法设计。方法和材料:定量阶段通过启动和完成率估计TPT的覆盖率和依从性,随后是定性阶段探索实施挑战。在2022年11月至2023年3月期间,从320个HHCC和8个项目利益相关者收集了数据。结果:在594例通报的结核病患者中,鉴定出320例HHCC,所有患者均符合TPT的条件。起始率为17.5%,完成率为9.7%。在非发起者中,91%的人不知情,8%的人认为TPT没有必要。约7%的患者因药物供应中断而停止治疗。启动不良与特定结核病单位、工作人员经验有限和缺乏家访有关。定性调查结果揭示了卫生系统的主要障碍,如TPT基本原理培训无效、沟通、缺乏家访和Nikshay门户网站问题。与受益人相关的障碍包括犹豫、迁移、对TPT的误解以及供应中断。结论:在HHCC中,TPT的覆盖率和依从性是次优的,卫生系统的挑战超过了受益人的障碍。在资源有限的情况下,加强对工作人员的TPT基本原理培训、有效的沟通、监督以及确保持续的药物供应可能对改善TPT的实施至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
7.10%
发文量
884
审稿时长
40 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书