Mihir K Patil, Goranit Sakunchotpanit, Sushila A Toulmin, Natalie Braun, Sofia Milosavljevic, Farrah L Ezzeddine, Thomas Z Rohan, W Austin Wyant, Lauren M Guggina, Vinod E Nambudiri, Christopher Iriarte
{"title":"High-Dose Oral Vitamin D for Toxic Effects of the Skin Associated With Chemotherapy and Radiation.","authors":"Mihir K Patil, Goranit Sakunchotpanit, Sushila A Toulmin, Natalie Braun, Sofia Milosavljevic, Farrah L Ezzeddine, Thomas Z Rohan, W Austin Wyant, Lauren M Guggina, Vinod E Nambudiri, Christopher Iriarte","doi":"10.1001/jamadermatol.2026.2267","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Importance: </strong>Severe cutaneous toxic effects from chemotherapy and radiation often require treatment interruptions. High-dose oral vitamin D (hdVD) has shown potential as a rapid immunomodulator in experimental models and small human studies, but robust clinical data in oncology populations remain limited.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the clinical response, safety profile, and time to improvement for hdVD in patients with toxic erythema of chemotherapy (TEC) and acute radiation dermatitis (ARD).</p><p><strong>Design, setting, and participants: </strong>This retrospective multicenter case series included 33 patients treated across 3 academic medical centers between December 2021 and January 2024. Eligible participants were those receiving hdVD (100 000 international units) for TEC or ARD with at least 10 days of follow-up.</p><p><strong>Exposures: </strong>One or 2 oral doses of 100 000 international units of cholecalciferol or ergocalciferol.</p><p><strong>Main outcomes and measures: </strong>The primary outcomes were time to patient-reported symptomatic relief and clinician-assessed objective improvement in erythema (using a 5-point Likert scale). Secondary outcomes included changes in serum calcium and the ability to continue anticancer therapy.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 33 patients (mean [SD] age, 60.9 [14.6] years; 19 [58%] female), 28 (85%) had TEC and 5 (15%) had ARD. Subjective symptom relief was reported by 26 of 30 patients (87%) within 10 days of treatment. The median (range) time to improvement was 5 (1-28) days overall and 3 (1-16) days for the inpatient subgroup. The mean (SD) Likert erythema score decreased from 4.36 (0.60) at baseline to 2.21 (1.36) by day 10. Patients with neutrophilic eccrine hidradenitis and Stevens-Johnson syndrome/toxic epidermal necrolysis-like subtypes showed the most rapid responses. No meaningful changes in serum calcium levels were observed, and 24 of the 33 patients (73%) continued anticancer therapy without interruption. No treatment-related adverse events were reported during the study.</p><p><strong>Conclusions and relevance: </strong>In this case series, hdVD was associated with rapid symptomatic and objective improvement in chemotherapy- and radiation-induced toxic effects of the skin without treatment-related adverse events. These findings support further study of hdVD as a supportive care approach in oncodermatology.</p>","PeriodicalId":14734,"journal":{"name":"JAMA dermatology","volume":" ","pages":"888-893"},"PeriodicalIF":10.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13373739/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JAMA dermatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1001/jamadermatol.2026.2267","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DERMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Importance: Severe cutaneous toxic effects from chemotherapy and radiation often require treatment interruptions. High-dose oral vitamin D (hdVD) has shown potential as a rapid immunomodulator in experimental models and small human studies, but robust clinical data in oncology populations remain limited.
Objective: To evaluate the clinical response, safety profile, and time to improvement for hdVD in patients with toxic erythema of chemotherapy (TEC) and acute radiation dermatitis (ARD).
Design, setting, and participants: This retrospective multicenter case series included 33 patients treated across 3 academic medical centers between December 2021 and January 2024. Eligible participants were those receiving hdVD (100 000 international units) for TEC or ARD with at least 10 days of follow-up.
Exposures: One or 2 oral doses of 100 000 international units of cholecalciferol or ergocalciferol.
Main outcomes and measures: The primary outcomes were time to patient-reported symptomatic relief and clinician-assessed objective improvement in erythema (using a 5-point Likert scale). Secondary outcomes included changes in serum calcium and the ability to continue anticancer therapy.
Results: Among 33 patients (mean [SD] age, 60.9 [14.6] years; 19 [58%] female), 28 (85%) had TEC and 5 (15%) had ARD. Subjective symptom relief was reported by 26 of 30 patients (87%) within 10 days of treatment. The median (range) time to improvement was 5 (1-28) days overall and 3 (1-16) days for the inpatient subgroup. The mean (SD) Likert erythema score decreased from 4.36 (0.60) at baseline to 2.21 (1.36) by day 10. Patients with neutrophilic eccrine hidradenitis and Stevens-Johnson syndrome/toxic epidermal necrolysis-like subtypes showed the most rapid responses. No meaningful changes in serum calcium levels were observed, and 24 of the 33 patients (73%) continued anticancer therapy without interruption. No treatment-related adverse events were reported during the study.
Conclusions and relevance: In this case series, hdVD was associated with rapid symptomatic and objective improvement in chemotherapy- and radiation-induced toxic effects of the skin without treatment-related adverse events. These findings support further study of hdVD as a supportive care approach in oncodermatology.
期刊介绍:
JAMA Dermatology is an international peer-reviewed journal that has been in continuous publication since 1882. It began publication by the American Medical Association in 1920 as Archives of Dermatology and Syphilology. The journal publishes material that helps in the development and testing of the effectiveness of diagnosis and treatment in medical and surgical dermatology, pediatric and geriatric dermatology, and oncologic and aesthetic dermatologic surgery.
JAMA Dermatology is a member of the JAMA Network, a consortium of peer-reviewed, general medical and specialty publications. It is published online weekly, every Wednesday, and in 12 print/online issues a year. The mission of the journal is to elevate the art and science of health and diseases of skin, hair, nails, and mucous membranes, and their treatment, with the aim of enabling dermatologists to deliver evidence-based, high-value medical and surgical dermatologic care.
The journal publishes a broad range of innovative studies and trials that shift research and clinical practice paradigms, expand the understanding of the burden of dermatologic diseases and key outcomes, improve the practice of dermatology, and ensure equitable care to all patients. It also features research and opinion examining ethical, moral, socioeconomic, educational, and political issues relevant to dermatologists, aiming to enable ongoing improvement to the workforce, scope of practice, and the training of future dermatologists.
JAMA Dermatology aims to be a leader in developing initiatives to improve diversity, equity, and inclusion within the specialty and within dermatology medical publishing.