Recent Advances in Nano Sorbent Materials for Solid-Phase Microextraction in Forensic Drug Analysis: Design, Functionalization, and Analytical Performance.

IF 7.7 2区 化学 Q1 CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL
Amal Al-Mosa, Sami Ullah, Abubakr M Idris
{"title":"Recent Advances in Nano Sorbent Materials for Solid-Phase Microextraction in Forensic Drug Analysis: Design, Functionalization, and Analytical Performance.","authors":"Amal Al-Mosa, Sami Ullah, Abubakr M Idris","doi":"10.1080/10408347.2026.2690150","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Solid-phase microextraction (SPME) has evolved into a key sample preparation technique in forensic drug analysis due to its solvent-free operation, high sensitivity, and compatibility with complex matrices. This review critically evaluates recent advances (2018-2025) in SPME sorbent materials, with particular emphasis on their design, functionalization, and analytical performance. Advanced sorbents, including metal-organic frameworks (MOFs), covalent organic frameworks (COFs), molecularly imprinted polymers (MIPs), carbon nanotubes (CNTs), hydrophilic-lipophilic balance (HLB) materials, and polymeric ionic liquids (PILs), demonstrate significant improvements over conventional coatings such as polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) and polyacrylate (PA). Reported enhancements include up to 24-fold higher adsorption capacity (SPME Arrow), 1.7-2245-fold increases in enrichment factors (COF-based sorbents), and LOD as low as ≤ 0.25-2 ng/mL in biological matrices. Recovery rates across advanced materials typically range from ∼77% to >100%, with hybrid and HLB-based systems achieving 81-120% and improved matrix tolerance. Additionally, CNT- and MOF-based sorbents exhibit high durability, maintaining performance over 50-300 extraction cycles, while MIP-based systems provide high selectivity with protein exclusion up to 98%. The review systematically correlates sorbent chemistry, fabrication strategies, and extraction mechanisms with analytical figures of merit, including sensitivity, linearity, and precision. By integrating these quantitative comparisons, this work highlights how rational sorbent design enhances extraction efficiency, reduces matrix effects, and improves reproducibility. The findings provide a comprehensive framework for selecting and developing next-generation SPME materials to support reliable, high-throughput, and legally defensible forensic drug analysis.</p>","PeriodicalId":10744,"journal":{"name":"Critical reviews in analytical chemistry","volume":" ","pages":"1-45"},"PeriodicalIF":7.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Critical reviews in analytical chemistry","FirstCategoryId":"92","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10408347.2026.2690150","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Solid-phase microextraction (SPME) has evolved into a key sample preparation technique in forensic drug analysis due to its solvent-free operation, high sensitivity, and compatibility with complex matrices. This review critically evaluates recent advances (2018-2025) in SPME sorbent materials, with particular emphasis on their design, functionalization, and analytical performance. Advanced sorbents, including metal-organic frameworks (MOFs), covalent organic frameworks (COFs), molecularly imprinted polymers (MIPs), carbon nanotubes (CNTs), hydrophilic-lipophilic balance (HLB) materials, and polymeric ionic liquids (PILs), demonstrate significant improvements over conventional coatings such as polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) and polyacrylate (PA). Reported enhancements include up to 24-fold higher adsorption capacity (SPME Arrow), 1.7-2245-fold increases in enrichment factors (COF-based sorbents), and LOD as low as ≤ 0.25-2 ng/mL in biological matrices. Recovery rates across advanced materials typically range from ∼77% to >100%, with hybrid and HLB-based systems achieving 81-120% and improved matrix tolerance. Additionally, CNT- and MOF-based sorbents exhibit high durability, maintaining performance over 50-300 extraction cycles, while MIP-based systems provide high selectivity with protein exclusion up to 98%. The review systematically correlates sorbent chemistry, fabrication strategies, and extraction mechanisms with analytical figures of merit, including sensitivity, linearity, and precision. By integrating these quantitative comparisons, this work highlights how rational sorbent design enhances extraction efficiency, reduces matrix effects, and improves reproducibility. The findings provide a comprehensive framework for selecting and developing next-generation SPME materials to support reliable, high-throughput, and legally defensible forensic drug analysis.

用于法医药物固相微萃取的纳米吸附材料的研究进展:设计、功能化和分析性能。
固相微萃取(SPME)因其无溶剂操作、高灵敏度和与复杂基质的相容性等优点,已成为法医学分析中重要的样品制备技术。这篇综述批判性地评估了SPME吸附材料的最新进展(2018-2025),特别强调了它们的设计、功能化和分析性能。先进的吸附剂,包括金属-有机框架(MOFs)、共价有机框架(COFs)、分子印迹聚合物(MIPs)、碳纳米管(CNTs)、亲水-亲脂平衡(HLB)材料和聚合物离子液体(PILs),都比传统的涂料如聚二甲基硅氧烷(PDMS)和聚丙烯酸酯(PA)有了显著的改进。报道的增强包括高达24倍的吸附容量(SPME Arrow),富集因子(cof基吸附剂)增加1.7-2245倍,生物基质的LOD低至≤0.25-2 ng/mL。先进材料的回收率通常在77%到100%之间,混合材料和基于hlb的系统可达到81-120%,并提高了基质耐受性。此外,基于碳纳米管和mof的吸附剂具有高耐久性,在50-300个萃取周期内保持性能,而基于mip的系统提供高选择性,蛋白质排除率高达98%。这篇综述系统地将吸附剂化学、制造策略和萃取机制与分析指标联系起来,包括灵敏度、线性度和精度。通过整合这些定量比较,这项工作强调了合理的吸附剂设计如何提高萃取效率,减少基质效应,并提高再现性。这些发现为选择和开发下一代SPME材料提供了一个全面的框架,以支持可靠、高通量和合法的法医药物分析。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
12.00
自引率
4.00%
发文量
137
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: Critical Reviews in Analytical Chemistry continues to be a dependable resource for both the expert and the student by providing in-depth, scholarly, insightful reviews of important topics within the discipline of analytical chemistry and related measurement sciences. The journal exclusively publishes review articles that illuminate the underlying science, that evaluate the field''s status by putting recent developments into proper perspective and context, and that speculate on possible future developments. A limited number of articles are of a "tutorial" format written by experts for scientists seeking introduction or clarification in a new area. This journal serves as a forum for linking various underlying components in broad and interdisciplinary means, while maintaining balance between applied and fundamental research. Topics we are interested in receiving reviews on are the following: · chemical analysis; · instrumentation; · chemometrics; · analytical biochemistry; · medicinal analysis; · forensics; · environmental sciences; · applied physics; · and material science.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书