Real-world efficacy and safety of SGLT2 inhibitor add-on triple therapy in south indian patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: a 24-week prospective observational cohort study.

IF 4.9 3区 医学 Q2 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM
Ananya Ginjupalli, Sreeram Thiriveedhi, Pavan Sai Nelluri, Sai Sravanth Reddy Tamma, Gitanjali Boppana, Suman Maharjan
{"title":"Real-world efficacy and safety of SGLT2 inhibitor add-on triple therapy in south indian patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: a 24-week prospective observational cohort study.","authors":"Ananya Ginjupalli, Sreeram Thiriveedhi, Pavan Sai Nelluri, Sai Sravanth Reddy Tamma, Gitanjali Boppana, Suman Maharjan","doi":"10.1186/s13098-026-02240-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) in South Asian populations is characterised by early-onset disease, visceral adiposity disproportionate to body mass index, and accelerated pancreatic β-cell decline which is collectively termed the Asian Indian Phenotype. This study evaluated the glycaemic, anthropometric, haemodynamic, hepatorenal, and mechanistic effects of adding a sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 (SGLT2) inhibitor to existing Metformin and Glimepiride dual therapy in South Indian patients with suboptimally controlled T2DM.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This prospective, single-arm observational cohort study (TREND statement for nonrandomised studies followed) enrolled 87 adult South Indian patients with T2DM inadequately controlled on Metformin (≥ 1500 mg/day) and Glimepiride (2-4 mg/day), with HbA1c 7.5-10.0% and eGFR ≥ 60 mL/min/1.73 m². Treatment was allocated at the discretion of the treating physician rather than by randomisation; patients received Dapagliflozin 10 mg (n = 52) or Empagliflozin 10-25 mg (n = 35) for 24 weeks. As an exploratory study, no a priori sample size calculation was performed and findings are considered hypothesis-generating. Continuous variables were assessed for normality (Shapiro-Wilk test and Q-Q plots); intra-group comparisons used the paired t-test with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Subgroup, correlation, responder, and multivariable regression analyses were prespecified and are exploratory.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>HbA1c declined from 8.62 ± 0.74% to 7.71 ± 0.58% at Week 24 (mean reduction: -0.91%; 95% CI: -1.08 to - 0.74%; p < 0.001). By Week 24, 60 patients (69.0%) achieved HbA1c < 8.0%, 31 (35.6%) achieved < 7.5%, and 9 (10.3%) reached < 7.0%. Fasting plasma glucose fell by 35.6 mg/dL (95% CI: -42.8 to - 28.4; p < 0.001) and post-prandial glucose by 47.6 mg/dL (95% CI: -57.9 to - 37.3; p < 0.001). Body weight decreased by 2.27 kg (95% CI: -4.29 to - 0.25; p = 0.028) and waist circumference by 2.36 cm (95% CI: -4.19 to - 0.53; p = 0.012). Systolic blood pressure fell by 6.3 mmHg (95% CI: -9.9 to - 2.7; p = 0.001). A biphasic eGFR trajectory was documented: dip to 83.1 ± 11.9 mL/min/1.73 m² at Week 12, recovering to 85.6 ± 11.2 at Week 24 (p = 0.007 vs. baseline). ALP decreased significantly (- 11.7 U/L; 95% CI: -18.4 to - 5.0; p = 0.001). Baseline HbA1c was the only independent predictor of glycaemic response on multivariable regression (β=-0.47 per %; p < 0.001; adjusted R²=0.32). No between-drug difference was detected (p = 0.62), though the study was not powered to demonstrate equivalence. Patients with baseline HbA1c 8.5-10.0% achieved a greater absolute reduction (- 1.15%) than those with 7.5-8.5% (- 0.63%; p = 0.003), a gradient partly attributable to regression to the mean; the lower-baseline subgroup, however, more frequently reached glycaemic targets. Genital mycotic infections occurred in 10.3% of women versus 2.1% of men. No serious adverse events occurred.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In this uncontrolled real-world cohort, SGLT2 inhibitor triple therapy was associated with multidimensional metabolic improvement in South Indian T2DM. No difference between the two agents was detected, though the study was not designed to establish equivalence. Baseline HbA1c independently predicted the magnitude of glycaemic response. Because the design was observational and lacked a comparator, these associations are hypothesis-generating and support earlier intensification while awaiting confirmation in randomised trials.</p>","PeriodicalId":11106,"journal":{"name":"Diabetology & Metabolic Syndrome","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13563832/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diabetology & Metabolic Syndrome","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13098-026-02240-x","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) in South Asian populations is characterised by early-onset disease, visceral adiposity disproportionate to body mass index, and accelerated pancreatic β-cell decline which is collectively termed the Asian Indian Phenotype. This study evaluated the glycaemic, anthropometric, haemodynamic, hepatorenal, and mechanistic effects of adding a sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 (SGLT2) inhibitor to existing Metformin and Glimepiride dual therapy in South Indian patients with suboptimally controlled T2DM.

Methods: This prospective, single-arm observational cohort study (TREND statement for nonrandomised studies followed) enrolled 87 adult South Indian patients with T2DM inadequately controlled on Metformin (≥ 1500 mg/day) and Glimepiride (2-4 mg/day), with HbA1c 7.5-10.0% and eGFR ≥ 60 mL/min/1.73 m². Treatment was allocated at the discretion of the treating physician rather than by randomisation; patients received Dapagliflozin 10 mg (n = 52) or Empagliflozin 10-25 mg (n = 35) for 24 weeks. As an exploratory study, no a priori sample size calculation was performed and findings are considered hypothesis-generating. Continuous variables were assessed for normality (Shapiro-Wilk test and Q-Q plots); intra-group comparisons used the paired t-test with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Subgroup, correlation, responder, and multivariable regression analyses were prespecified and are exploratory.

Results: HbA1c declined from 8.62 ± 0.74% to 7.71 ± 0.58% at Week 24 (mean reduction: -0.91%; 95% CI: -1.08 to - 0.74%; p < 0.001). By Week 24, 60 patients (69.0%) achieved HbA1c < 8.0%, 31 (35.6%) achieved < 7.5%, and 9 (10.3%) reached < 7.0%. Fasting plasma glucose fell by 35.6 mg/dL (95% CI: -42.8 to - 28.4; p < 0.001) and post-prandial glucose by 47.6 mg/dL (95% CI: -57.9 to - 37.3; p < 0.001). Body weight decreased by 2.27 kg (95% CI: -4.29 to - 0.25; p = 0.028) and waist circumference by 2.36 cm (95% CI: -4.19 to - 0.53; p = 0.012). Systolic blood pressure fell by 6.3 mmHg (95% CI: -9.9 to - 2.7; p = 0.001). A biphasic eGFR trajectory was documented: dip to 83.1 ± 11.9 mL/min/1.73 m² at Week 12, recovering to 85.6 ± 11.2 at Week 24 (p = 0.007 vs. baseline). ALP decreased significantly (- 11.7 U/L; 95% CI: -18.4 to - 5.0; p = 0.001). Baseline HbA1c was the only independent predictor of glycaemic response on multivariable regression (β=-0.47 per %; p < 0.001; adjusted R²=0.32). No between-drug difference was detected (p = 0.62), though the study was not powered to demonstrate equivalence. Patients with baseline HbA1c 8.5-10.0% achieved a greater absolute reduction (- 1.15%) than those with 7.5-8.5% (- 0.63%; p = 0.003), a gradient partly attributable to regression to the mean; the lower-baseline subgroup, however, more frequently reached glycaemic targets. Genital mycotic infections occurred in 10.3% of women versus 2.1% of men. No serious adverse events occurred.

Conclusion: In this uncontrolled real-world cohort, SGLT2 inhibitor triple therapy was associated with multidimensional metabolic improvement in South Indian T2DM. No difference between the two agents was detected, though the study was not designed to establish equivalence. Baseline HbA1c independently predicted the magnitude of glycaemic response. Because the design was observational and lacked a comparator, these associations are hypothesis-generating and support earlier intensification while awaiting confirmation in randomised trials.

SGLT2抑制剂加用三联疗法治疗南印度2型糖尿病患者的实际疗效和安全性:一项为期24周的前瞻性观察队列研究
背景:南亚人群中2型糖尿病(T2DM)的特点是早发性疾病,内脏脂肪与体重指数不成比例,胰腺β细胞加速衰退,统称为亚洲印度表型。本研究评估了在现有的二甲双胍和格列美脲双重治疗中加入钠-葡萄糖共转运体-2 (SGLT2)抑制剂对南印度控制不佳的T2DM患者的血糖、人体测量、血流动力学、肝肾和机制的影响。方法:这项前瞻性单组观察队列研究(非随机研究的趋势声明)纳入87名成年南印度T2DM患者,二甲双胍(≥1500mg /天)和格列美脲(2- 4mg /天)控制不充分,HbA1c 7.5-10.0%, eGFR≥60ml /min/1.73 m²。治疗由治疗医师自行决定,而不是随机分配;患者接受达格列净10 mg (n = 52)或恩帕格列净10-25 mg (n = 35)治疗24周。作为一项探索性研究,没有进行先验的样本量计算,研究结果被认为是假设生成。对连续变量进行正态性评估(Shapiro-Wilk检验和Q-Q图);组内比较采用配对t检验,95%置信区间(ci)。亚组、相关性、应答者和多变量回归分析是预先指定的,并且是探索性的。结果:在第24周,HbA1c从8.62±0.74%下降到7.71±0.58%(平均下降:-0.91%;95% CI: -1.08至- 0.74%;p)结论:在这个未控制的现实世界队列中,SGLT2抑制剂三联治疗与南印度T2DM患者的多维代谢改善有关。两种药物之间没有发现差异,尽管研究的目的不是建立等效性。基线HbA1c独立预测血糖反应的大小。由于设计是观察性的,缺乏比较物,这些关联是假设产生的,支持早期强化,等待随机试验的证实。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Diabetology & Metabolic Syndrome
Diabetology & Metabolic Syndrome ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM-
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
170
审稿时长
7.5 months
期刊介绍: Diabetology & Metabolic Syndrome publishes articles on all aspects of the pathophysiology of diabetes and metabolic syndrome. By publishing original material exploring any area of laboratory, animal or clinical research into diabetes and metabolic syndrome, the journal offers a high-visibility forum for new insights and discussions into the issues of importance to the relevant community.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书