Mitigating chemical degradation in amorphous and lipid-based formulations through cyclodextrin complexation and nanosizing.

IF 2.6 4区 医学 Q3 CHEMISTRY, MEDICINAL
Stephie Lee, Preetanshu Pandey
{"title":"Mitigating chemical degradation in amorphous and lipid-based formulations through cyclodextrin complexation and nanosizing.","authors":"Stephie Lee, Preetanshu Pandey","doi":"10.1080/03639045.2026.2703800","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate formulation enabling technologies for improving bioavailability of a poorly water-soluble, weakly basic compound with inherent chemical stability challenges.</p><p><strong>Significance: </strong>While exposure enhancement is a key objective in developing poorly soluble compounds, chemical stability liabilities may be overlooked during technology screening. A balanced assessment of pharmacokinetics (bioavailability) and stability is critical for successful formulation development.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Initial screening evaluated pH modification, lipid-based formulation (LBF), and amorphous solid dispersion (ASD) technologies. Stability and pharmacokinetic (PK) performance were assessed in dogs and compared with conventional crystalline formulation. Due to chemical stability challenges, additional technology screening using nanosizing and cyclodextrin complexation was conducted. Chemical stability studies were performed under accelerated conditions (40 °C/75%RH).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The pH-modified formulation showed no PK improvement. LBF and ASD provided a 40-50% increase in AUC<sub>0-24</sub>, indicating enhanced exposure in the amorphous state. However, all three approaches exhibited chemical degradation, with LBF showing >25% degradation after 3 weeks at 40 °C/75%RH. The addition of antioxidants did not improve stability. Nanosizing and cyclodextrin complexation resulted in >2-fold increases in <i>C</i><sub>max</sub> and AUC<sub>0-24</sub>. Importantly, both approaches demonstrated excellent chemical stability under accelerated conditions.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Although LBF and ASD improved PK exposure, chemical instability limited their suitability. Nanosizing and cyclodextrin complexation provided superior bioavailability enhancement with robust stability, highlighting the importance of simultaneously optimizing exposure and chemical stability during formulation development.</p>","PeriodicalId":11263,"journal":{"name":"Drug Development and Industrial Pharmacy","volume":" ","pages":"1834-1848"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Drug Development and Industrial Pharmacy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/03639045.2026.2703800","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/7/21 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MEDICINAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate formulation enabling technologies for improving bioavailability of a poorly water-soluble, weakly basic compound with inherent chemical stability challenges.

Significance: While exposure enhancement is a key objective in developing poorly soluble compounds, chemical stability liabilities may be overlooked during technology screening. A balanced assessment of pharmacokinetics (bioavailability) and stability is critical for successful formulation development.

Methods: Initial screening evaluated pH modification, lipid-based formulation (LBF), and amorphous solid dispersion (ASD) technologies. Stability and pharmacokinetic (PK) performance were assessed in dogs and compared with conventional crystalline formulation. Due to chemical stability challenges, additional technology screening using nanosizing and cyclodextrin complexation was conducted. Chemical stability studies were performed under accelerated conditions (40 °C/75%RH).

Results: The pH-modified formulation showed no PK improvement. LBF and ASD provided a 40-50% increase in AUC0-24, indicating enhanced exposure in the amorphous state. However, all three approaches exhibited chemical degradation, with LBF showing >25% degradation after 3 weeks at 40 °C/75%RH. The addition of antioxidants did not improve stability. Nanosizing and cyclodextrin complexation resulted in >2-fold increases in Cmax and AUC0-24. Importantly, both approaches demonstrated excellent chemical stability under accelerated conditions.

Conclusions: Although LBF and ASD improved PK exposure, chemical instability limited their suitability. Nanosizing and cyclodextrin complexation provided superior bioavailability enhancement with robust stability, highlighting the importance of simultaneously optimizing exposure and chemical stability during formulation development.

通过环糊精配合物和纳米化来减轻无定形和脂基配方的化学降解。
目的:评价提高具有固有化学稳定性挑战的低水溶性弱碱性化合物生物利用度的配方技术。虽然暴露增强是开发难溶性化合物的关键目标,但在技术筛选过程中可能会忽略化学稳定性责任。平衡评估药代动力学(生物利用度)和稳定性对成功的制剂开发至关重要。方法:初步筛选评价pH改性、脂基配方(LBF)和非晶固体分散(ASD)技术。在犬体内评估其稳定性和药代动力学(PK)性能,并与常规结晶制剂进行比较。由于化学稳定性方面的挑战,采用纳米化和环糊精络合进行了额外的技术筛选。在加速条件下(40°C/75%RH)进行化学稳定性研究。结果:ph改性制剂对PK无改善作用。LBF和ASD使AUC0-24增加40-50%,表明非晶态暴露增强。然而,这三种方法都表现出化学降解,在40°C/75%RH条件下,LBF在3周后的降解率为25%。抗氧化剂的加入并没有提高稳定性。纳米化和环糊精络合使Cmax和AUC0-24增加了2倍。重要的是,这两种方法在加速条件下都表现出优异的化学稳定性。结论:虽然LBF和ASD改善了PK暴露,但化学不稳定性限制了它们的适用性。纳米化和环糊精络合提供了卓越的生物利用度增强和强大的稳定性,突出了同时优化暴露和化学稳定性在配方开发过程中的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
82
审稿时长
4.5 months
期刊介绍: The aim of Drug Development and Industrial Pharmacy is to publish novel, original, peer-reviewed research manuscripts within relevant topics and research methods related to pharmaceutical research and development, and industrial pharmacy. Research papers must be hypothesis driven and emphasize innovative breakthrough topics in pharmaceutics and drug delivery. The journal will also consider timely critical review papers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书