Between- and within-person variability in postprandial blood amino acid kinetics after ingestion of a good and a moderately digestible protein source: a randomised trial.

IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q2 NUTRITION & DIETETICS
Marco Mensink, Meeke Ummels, Ron Wehrens, Jasper Engel, Nikkie van der Wielen, Diederik Esser, Jurriaan J Mes
{"title":"Between- and within-person variability in postprandial blood amino acid kinetics after ingestion of a good and a moderately digestible protein source: a randomised trial.","authors":"Marco Mensink, Meeke Ummels, Ron Wehrens, Jasper Engel, Nikkie van der Wielen, Diederik Esser, Jurriaan J Mes","doi":"10.1017/S0007114526108010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Protein intake and the resulting postprandial aminoacidemia are important anabolic stimuli. However, considerable individual variation in postprandial amino acid (AA) kinetics can be expected. In this study, the aim was to quantify the variability in postprandial AA kinetics within and between individuals after consumption of a moderately digestible plant protein concentrate (lucerne (alfalfa), LPC) and an easily digestible animal protein concentrate (whey, WPC). Eighteen healthy young adults consumed a 20 g protein drink on five occasions (3xLPC; 2xWPC). Plasma AA kinetics were calculated, and a mixed model was fitted to describe within- and between-individual variability and to calculate the intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC). AA kinetics showed significant variation between and within individuals, both for WPC and LPC. Between-individual variation in postprandial response for total AA (TAA) or total essential AA (TEAA) was in general larger than within-individual variation for WPC with the ICC with or without blood volume (BV) correction ranging from 0·45 to 0·77. For LPC, the within-individual variation of the TAA response was higher than the between-individual variation, and for TEAA they were more or less equal, with the ICC with or without BV correction ranging from 0·34 to 0·58 for LPC. Subjects with a high level of aminoacidemia for one protein source were not necessarily those with a high level for the other protein source. Our results indicate that between- and within-person variation in postprandial AA kinetics are substantial and should not be neglected.</p>","PeriodicalId":9257,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Nutrition","volume":" ","pages":"1-10"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Journal of Nutrition","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007114526108010","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NUTRITION & DIETETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Protein intake and the resulting postprandial aminoacidemia are important anabolic stimuli. However, considerable individual variation in postprandial amino acid (AA) kinetics can be expected. In this study, the aim was to quantify the variability in postprandial AA kinetics within and between individuals after consumption of a moderately digestible plant protein concentrate (lucerne (alfalfa), LPC) and an easily digestible animal protein concentrate (whey, WPC). Eighteen healthy young adults consumed a 20 g protein drink on five occasions (3xLPC; 2xWPC). Plasma AA kinetics were calculated, and a mixed model was fitted to describe within- and between-individual variability and to calculate the intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC). AA kinetics showed significant variation between and within individuals, both for WPC and LPC. Between-individual variation in postprandial response for total AA (TAA) or total essential AA (TEAA) was in general larger than within-individual variation for WPC with the ICC with or without blood volume (BV) correction ranging from 0·45 to 0·77. For LPC, the within-individual variation of the TAA response was higher than the between-individual variation, and for TEAA they were more or less equal, with the ICC with or without BV correction ranging from 0·34 to 0·58 for LPC. Subjects with a high level of aminoacidemia for one protein source were not necessarily those with a high level for the other protein source. Our results indicate that between- and within-person variation in postprandial AA kinetics are substantial and should not be neglected.

摄入良好和中等可消化蛋白质来源后餐后血液氨基酸动力学的人之间和人体内变异:一项随机试验。
蛋白质摄入和由此产生的餐后氨基酸血症是一种重要的合成代谢刺激。然而,在餐后氨基酸(AA)动力学相当大的个体差异可以预期。在这项研究中,目的是量化食用中等消化的植物蛋白浓缩物(卢塞恩(苜蓿),LPC)和易消化的动物蛋白浓缩物(乳清,WPC)后个体内部和个体之间餐后AA动力学的变化。18名健康的年轻人分5次饮用20克蛋白质饮料(3xLPC;2xWPC)。计算了血浆AA动力学,并拟合了一个混合模型来描述个体内和个体间的变异,并计算了类内相关系数(ICC)。WPC和LPC个体间和个体内AA动力学均有显著差异。总的或总的必需AA (TAA, TEAA)的餐后反应的个体间差异通常大于ICCs伴或不伴血容量校正的WPC的个体内差异,范围在0.45-0.77之间。对于LPC, TAA反应的个体内变异大于个体间变异,对于TEAA,两者基本相等;ICCs的血容量校正范围在0.34-0.58之间(LPC)。一种蛋白质来源的高水平氨基酸血症受试者并不一定是另一种蛋白质来源的高水平氨基酸血症受试者。我们的研究结果表明,餐后AA动力学的人与人之间和人与人之间的差异是实质性的,不应被忽视。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
British Journal of Nutrition
British Journal of Nutrition 医学-营养学
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
5.60%
发文量
740
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: British Journal of Nutrition is a leading international peer-reviewed journal covering research on human and clinical nutrition, animal nutrition and basic science as applied to nutrition. The Journal recognises the multidisciplinary nature of nutritional science and includes material from all of the specialities involved in nutrition research, including molecular and cell biology and nutritional genomics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书