Carlos Gallego-Moll, Laia Maynou, Phil Mawson, Martin Kelly, Joseph Stuart Elborn, Adam T Hill, Timothy Gatheral, Anita Sullivan, Charles Haworth, John R Hurst, Jeremy Stuart Brown, Mary P Carroll, Michael R Loebinger, Judy M Bradley, Paul Walker, John Steer, Jamie Duckers, James D Chalmers, Richard McNally, Anthony De Soyza, Alistair McGuire
{"title":"Resource impact of bronchiectasis and associated exacerbations: based on a 5-year prospective observational cohort study (BronchUK).","authors":"Carlos Gallego-Moll, Laia Maynou, Phil Mawson, Martin Kelly, Joseph Stuart Elborn, Adam T Hill, Timothy Gatheral, Anita Sullivan, Charles Haworth, John R Hurst, Jeremy Stuart Brown, Mary P Carroll, Michael R Loebinger, Judy M Bradley, Paul Walker, John Steer, Jamie Duckers, James D Chalmers, Richard McNally, Anthony De Soyza, Alistair McGuire","doi":"10.1136/bmjresp-2026-004203","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Our objective is to document major healthcare resource use and associated costs in the care of patients with bronchiectasis, with a particular focus on the costs incurred by exacerbations.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We use a unique dataset from the Bronchiectasis Observational Cohort and Biobank UK. The study includes a baseline cohort of 1119 patients with a primary diagnosis of bronchiectasis, followed for up to five years. Data were extracted and linked to centrally held National Health Service (NHS) resource use data.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The average age of the cohort was 64 years and 62% were female. The most common bronchiectasis aetiology was idiopathic or post-infectious. Across follow-ups, exacerbations became less frequent: the proportion of patients with no events increased for all settings, while recurrent (≥2) events declined markedly and single-event categories remained largely stable. Exacerbations were predominantly managed in primary care settings. Based on exacerbation frequency and type and applying 2024/2025 NHS reference costs, the estimated total healthcare exacerbation costs for the study population ranged from £2 million to £3.2 million. Disaggregated estimates for the highest cost scenario include: general practitioner (GP)-only exacerbations (n=2824 events; £479 945), emergency department-managed exacerbations (n=311; £260 126) and inpatient-managed exacerbations (n=680; £2 428 291). The average estimated cost per patient over the full period was £1943. This corresponds to a weighted annual average of £495 per patient (including patients with no exacerbations), with most costs attributable to inpatient-managed exacerbations. Specifically, the average cost was £2980 for individuals with one or more exacerbations, £4865 for those with two or more and £5875 for those with three or more.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The findings highlight the economic burden of bronchiectasis exacerbations and demonstrate that targeted management strategies to reduce exacerbation rates should increase health benefits and substantially reduce healthcare costs associated with bronchiectasis.</p>","PeriodicalId":9048,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Open Respiratory Research","volume":"13 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13374417/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Open Respiratory Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjresp-2026-004203","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Our objective is to document major healthcare resource use and associated costs in the care of patients with bronchiectasis, with a particular focus on the costs incurred by exacerbations.
Methods: We use a unique dataset from the Bronchiectasis Observational Cohort and Biobank UK. The study includes a baseline cohort of 1119 patients with a primary diagnosis of bronchiectasis, followed for up to five years. Data were extracted and linked to centrally held National Health Service (NHS) resource use data.
Results: The average age of the cohort was 64 years and 62% were female. The most common bronchiectasis aetiology was idiopathic or post-infectious. Across follow-ups, exacerbations became less frequent: the proportion of patients with no events increased for all settings, while recurrent (≥2) events declined markedly and single-event categories remained largely stable. Exacerbations were predominantly managed in primary care settings. Based on exacerbation frequency and type and applying 2024/2025 NHS reference costs, the estimated total healthcare exacerbation costs for the study population ranged from £2 million to £3.2 million. Disaggregated estimates for the highest cost scenario include: general practitioner (GP)-only exacerbations (n=2824 events; £479 945), emergency department-managed exacerbations (n=311; £260 126) and inpatient-managed exacerbations (n=680; £2 428 291). The average estimated cost per patient over the full period was £1943. This corresponds to a weighted annual average of £495 per patient (including patients with no exacerbations), with most costs attributable to inpatient-managed exacerbations. Specifically, the average cost was £2980 for individuals with one or more exacerbations, £4865 for those with two or more and £5875 for those with three or more.
Conclusions: The findings highlight the economic burden of bronchiectasis exacerbations and demonstrate that targeted management strategies to reduce exacerbation rates should increase health benefits and substantially reduce healthcare costs associated with bronchiectasis.
期刊介绍:
BMJ Open Respiratory Research is a peer-reviewed, open access journal publishing respiratory and critical care medicine. It is the sister journal to Thorax and co-owned by the British Thoracic Society and BMJ. The journal focuses on robustness of methodology and scientific rigour with less emphasis on novelty or perceived impact. BMJ Open Respiratory Research operates a rapid review process, with continuous publication online, ensuring timely, up-to-date research is available worldwide. The journal publishes review articles and all research study types: Basic science including laboratory based experiments and animal models, Pilot studies or proof of concept, Observational studies, Study protocols, Registries, Clinical trials from phase I to multicentre randomised clinical trials, Systematic reviews and meta-analyses.