Resource impact of bronchiectasis and associated exacerbations: based on a 5-year prospective observational cohort study (BronchUK).

IF 4 3区 医学 Q1 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM
Carlos Gallego-Moll, Laia Maynou, Phil Mawson, Martin Kelly, Joseph Stuart Elborn, Adam T Hill, Timothy Gatheral, Anita Sullivan, Charles Haworth, John R Hurst, Jeremy Stuart Brown, Mary P Carroll, Michael R Loebinger, Judy M Bradley, Paul Walker, John Steer, Jamie Duckers, James D Chalmers, Richard McNally, Anthony De Soyza, Alistair McGuire
{"title":"Resource impact of bronchiectasis and associated exacerbations: based on a 5-year prospective observational cohort study (BronchUK).","authors":"Carlos Gallego-Moll, Laia Maynou, Phil Mawson, Martin Kelly, Joseph Stuart Elborn, Adam T Hill, Timothy Gatheral, Anita Sullivan, Charles Haworth, John R Hurst, Jeremy Stuart Brown, Mary P Carroll, Michael R Loebinger, Judy M Bradley, Paul Walker, John Steer, Jamie Duckers, James D Chalmers, Richard McNally, Anthony De Soyza, Alistair McGuire","doi":"10.1136/bmjresp-2026-004203","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Our objective is to document major healthcare resource use and associated costs in the care of patients with bronchiectasis, with a particular focus on the costs incurred by exacerbations.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We use a unique dataset from the Bronchiectasis Observational Cohort and Biobank UK. The study includes a baseline cohort of 1119 patients with a primary diagnosis of bronchiectasis, followed for up to five years. Data were extracted and linked to centrally held National Health Service (NHS) resource use data.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The average age of the cohort was 64 years and 62% were female. The most common bronchiectasis aetiology was idiopathic or post-infectious. Across follow-ups, exacerbations became less frequent: the proportion of patients with no events increased for all settings, while recurrent (≥2) events declined markedly and single-event categories remained largely stable. Exacerbations were predominantly managed in primary care settings. Based on exacerbation frequency and type and applying 2024/2025 NHS reference costs, the estimated total healthcare exacerbation costs for the study population ranged from £2 million to £3.2 million. Disaggregated estimates for the highest cost scenario include: general practitioner (GP)-only exacerbations (n=2824 events; £479 945), emergency department-managed exacerbations (n=311; £260 126) and inpatient-managed exacerbations (n=680; £2 428 291). The average estimated cost per patient over the full period was £1943. This corresponds to a weighted annual average of £495 per patient (including patients with no exacerbations), with most costs attributable to inpatient-managed exacerbations. Specifically, the average cost was £2980 for individuals with one or more exacerbations, £4865 for those with two or more and £5875 for those with three or more.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The findings highlight the economic burden of bronchiectasis exacerbations and demonstrate that targeted management strategies to reduce exacerbation rates should increase health benefits and substantially reduce healthcare costs associated with bronchiectasis.</p>","PeriodicalId":9048,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Open Respiratory Research","volume":"13 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13374417/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Open Respiratory Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjresp-2026-004203","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Our objective is to document major healthcare resource use and associated costs in the care of patients with bronchiectasis, with a particular focus on the costs incurred by exacerbations.

Methods: We use a unique dataset from the Bronchiectasis Observational Cohort and Biobank UK. The study includes a baseline cohort of 1119 patients with a primary diagnosis of bronchiectasis, followed for up to five years. Data were extracted and linked to centrally held National Health Service (NHS) resource use data.

Results: The average age of the cohort was 64 years and 62% were female. The most common bronchiectasis aetiology was idiopathic or post-infectious. Across follow-ups, exacerbations became less frequent: the proportion of patients with no events increased for all settings, while recurrent (≥2) events declined markedly and single-event categories remained largely stable. Exacerbations were predominantly managed in primary care settings. Based on exacerbation frequency and type and applying 2024/2025 NHS reference costs, the estimated total healthcare exacerbation costs for the study population ranged from £2 million to £3.2 million. Disaggregated estimates for the highest cost scenario include: general practitioner (GP)-only exacerbations (n=2824 events; £479 945), emergency department-managed exacerbations (n=311; £260 126) and inpatient-managed exacerbations (n=680; £2 428 291). The average estimated cost per patient over the full period was £1943. This corresponds to a weighted annual average of £495 per patient (including patients with no exacerbations), with most costs attributable to inpatient-managed exacerbations. Specifically, the average cost was £2980 for individuals with one or more exacerbations, £4865 for those with two or more and £5875 for those with three or more.

Conclusions: The findings highlight the economic burden of bronchiectasis exacerbations and demonstrate that targeted management strategies to reduce exacerbation rates should increase health benefits and substantially reduce healthcare costs associated with bronchiectasis.

支气管扩张和相关恶化的资源影响:基于一项5年前瞻性观察队列研究(BronchUK)。
背景:我们的目的是记录支气管扩张患者护理中的主要医疗资源使用和相关成本,特别关注病情加重所产生的成本。方法:我们使用来自支气管扩张观察队列和英国生物银行的独特数据集。该研究包括1119例原发性支气管扩张患者的基线队列,随访时间长达5年。数据被提取并链接到中央保存的国家卫生服务(NHS)资源使用数据。结果:队列平均年龄64岁,女性占62%。最常见的支气管扩张病因是特发性或感染后。在随访中,恶化变得不那么频繁了:在所有情况下,无事件的患者比例都增加了,而复发(≥2)事件的患者比例明显下降,单事件类别基本保持稳定。病情恶化主要在初级保健机构进行管理。根据恶化频率和类型,并应用2024/2025年NHS参考成本,研究人群的医疗保健恶化总成本估计在200万至320万英镑之间。对最高成本情景的分类估计包括:仅全科医生(GP)的恶化(n=2824例事件;479 945英镑)、急诊部门管理的恶化(n=311例;260 126英镑)和住院患者管理的恶化(n=680例;2428 291英镑)。在整个期间,每个病人的平均估计费用为1943英镑。这相当于每位患者(包括无病情加重的患者)的加权年平均费用为495英镑,其中大部分费用可归因于住院患者管理的病情加重。具体来说,有一次或多次病情恶化的人的平均费用为2980英镑,有两次或两次以上病情恶化的人的平均费用为4865英镑,有三次或三次以上病情恶化的人的平均费用为5875英镑。结论:研究结果强调了支气管扩张恶化的经济负担,并表明有针对性的管理策略可以降低恶化率,从而增加健康效益,并大幅降低与支气管扩张相关的医疗成本。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMJ Open Respiratory Research
BMJ Open Respiratory Research RESPIRATORY SYSTEM-
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
2.40%
发文量
95
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: BMJ Open Respiratory Research is a peer-reviewed, open access journal publishing respiratory and critical care medicine. It is the sister journal to Thorax and co-owned by the British Thoracic Society and BMJ. The journal focuses on robustness of methodology and scientific rigour with less emphasis on novelty or perceived impact. BMJ Open Respiratory Research operates a rapid review process, with continuous publication online, ensuring timely, up-to-date research is available worldwide. The journal publishes review articles and all research study types: Basic science including laboratory based experiments and animal models, Pilot studies or proof of concept, Observational studies, Study protocols, Registries, Clinical trials from phase I to multicentre randomised clinical trials, Systematic reviews and meta-analyses.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书