Biologic therapies targeting type 2 inflammation in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.

IF 4 3区 医学 Q1 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM
Camelia Pescaru, Alexandru Florian Crisan, Monica Marc, Ana Adriana Trusculescu, Septimiu Radu Susa, Adelina Maritescu, Cristian Oancea
{"title":"Biologic therapies targeting type 2 inflammation in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.","authors":"Camelia Pescaru, Alexandru Florian Crisan, Monica Marc, Ana Adriana Trusculescu, Septimiu Radu Susa, Adelina Maritescu, Cristian Oancea","doi":"10.1136/bmjresp-2026-004234","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a heterogeneous disease, and a subset of patients exhibits type 2 (T2) inflammation. Biologic therapies targeting T2 inflammatory pathways have been evaluated in COPD, but their clinical efficacy remains variable. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the efficacy and safety of biologic therapies targeting T2 inflammation in COPD.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Randomised controlled trials evaluating biologic therapies targeting interleukin (IL)-5, IL-5 receptor α, IL-4/IL-13 or thymic stromal lymphopoietin in patients with COPD and biomarker-defined T2 inflammation were systematically identified. Outcomes included moderate or severe COPD exacerbations, lung function (forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV₁)), health-related quality of life assessed by the St George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) and serious adverse events. Random-effects meta-analyses were conducted when at least two comparable studies were available. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane Risk-of-Bias 2 tool.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seven randomised controlled trials were included in the quantitative synthesis. Biologic therapies targeting T2 inflammation significantly reduced the rate of moderate or severe COPD exacerbations compared with placebo (rate ratio 0.77, 95% CI 0.72 to 0.83; p<0.001; I²=0%). Lung function improved modestly with a pooled increase in FEV₁ of 43 mL (95% CI 12.5 to 73.6; p=0.006; I²=55.3%). SGRQ total scores improved by -2.46 units (95% CI -3.43 to -1.49; p<0.001; I²=0%). Subgroup analyses showed the greatest reduction in exacerbations with IL-4/IL-13-targeting therapy in patients with blood eosinophil counts ≥300 cells/µL. No significant increase in serious adverse events was observed.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Biologic therapies targeting T2 inflammation improve clinical outcomes in certain patients with COPD. The most consistent improvements were observed in studies that focused on inhibiting the IL-4/IL-13 pathway. However, variations in patient selection and in T2 enrichment strategies across trials make direct comparisons challenging. These results favour a biomarker-based, personalised approach over the routine use of biologics in unselected populations with COPD.</p>","PeriodicalId":9048,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Open Respiratory Research","volume":"13 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13374412/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Open Respiratory Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjresp-2026-004234","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a heterogeneous disease, and a subset of patients exhibits type 2 (T2) inflammation. Biologic therapies targeting T2 inflammatory pathways have been evaluated in COPD, but their clinical efficacy remains variable. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the efficacy and safety of biologic therapies targeting T2 inflammation in COPD.

Methods: Randomised controlled trials evaluating biologic therapies targeting interleukin (IL)-5, IL-5 receptor α, IL-4/IL-13 or thymic stromal lymphopoietin in patients with COPD and biomarker-defined T2 inflammation were systematically identified. Outcomes included moderate or severe COPD exacerbations, lung function (forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV₁)), health-related quality of life assessed by the St George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) and serious adverse events. Random-effects meta-analyses were conducted when at least two comparable studies were available. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane Risk-of-Bias 2 tool.

Results: Seven randomised controlled trials were included in the quantitative synthesis. Biologic therapies targeting T2 inflammation significantly reduced the rate of moderate or severe COPD exacerbations compared with placebo (rate ratio 0.77, 95% CI 0.72 to 0.83; p<0.001; I²=0%). Lung function improved modestly with a pooled increase in FEV₁ of 43 mL (95% CI 12.5 to 73.6; p=0.006; I²=55.3%). SGRQ total scores improved by -2.46 units (95% CI -3.43 to -1.49; p<0.001; I²=0%). Subgroup analyses showed the greatest reduction in exacerbations with IL-4/IL-13-targeting therapy in patients with blood eosinophil counts ≥300 cells/µL. No significant increase in serious adverse events was observed.

Conclusions: Biologic therapies targeting T2 inflammation improve clinical outcomes in certain patients with COPD. The most consistent improvements were observed in studies that focused on inhibiting the IL-4/IL-13 pathway. However, variations in patient selection and in T2 enrichment strategies across trials make direct comparisons challenging. These results favour a biomarker-based, personalised approach over the routine use of biologics in unselected populations with COPD.

针对慢性阻塞性肺疾病2型炎症的生物疗法:随机对照试验的系统回顾和荟萃分析
背景:慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)是一种异质性疾病,一部分患者表现为2型(T2)炎症。针对T2炎症通路的生物疗法已经在COPD中进行了评估,但其临床疗效仍不稳定。我们进行了一项系统回顾和荟萃分析,以评估针对COPD患者T2炎症的生物疗法的有效性和安全性。方法:随机对照试验评估针对白细胞介素(IL)-5、IL-5受体α、IL-4/IL-13或胸腺基质淋巴生成素的生物疗法在COPD和生物标志物定义的T2炎症患者中的应用。结果包括中度或重度COPD加重、肺功能(5秒用力呼气量(FEV 1))、圣乔治呼吸问卷(SGRQ)评估的健康相关生活质量和严重不良事件。当至少有两项可比较研究时,进行随机效应荟萃分析。使用Cochrane Risk-of- bias 2工具评估偏倚风险。结果:定量综合纳入7项随机对照试验。与安慰剂相比,靶向T2炎症的生物疗法显著降低了中度或重度COPD恶化的发生率(比率0.77,95% CI 0.72至0.83)。结论:靶向T2炎症的生物疗法改善了某些COPD患者的临床结局。在专注于抑制IL-4/IL-13途径的研究中观察到最一致的改善。然而,不同试验中患者选择和T2富集策略的差异使得直接比较具有挑战性。这些结果支持基于生物标志物的个性化方法,而不是常规使用生物制剂治疗非选择性COPD患者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMJ Open Respiratory Research
BMJ Open Respiratory Research RESPIRATORY SYSTEM-
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
2.40%
发文量
95
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: BMJ Open Respiratory Research is a peer-reviewed, open access journal publishing respiratory and critical care medicine. It is the sister journal to Thorax and co-owned by the British Thoracic Society and BMJ. The journal focuses on robustness of methodology and scientific rigour with less emphasis on novelty or perceived impact. BMJ Open Respiratory Research operates a rapid review process, with continuous publication online, ensuring timely, up-to-date research is available worldwide. The journal publishes review articles and all research study types: Basic science including laboratory based experiments and animal models, Pilot studies or proof of concept, Observational studies, Study protocols, Registries, Clinical trials from phase I to multicentre randomised clinical trials, Systematic reviews and meta-analyses.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书