MRI-based radiomics interpretable model predicts microsatellite instability status in endometrioid adenocarcinoma.

IF 3.9 3区 医学 Q2 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Ying Wang, Qinqin Yi, Xia Feng, Yan Luo, Xue Tang, Jingshan Gong
{"title":"MRI-based radiomics interpretable model predicts microsatellite instability status in endometrioid adenocarcinoma.","authors":"Ying Wang, Qinqin Yi, Xia Feng, Yan Luo, Xue Tang, Jingshan Gong","doi":"10.1186/s12880-026-02585-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To develop and validate a multiparametric MRI-based radiomics model for noninvasive preoperative prediction of microsatellite instability (MSI) in patients with endometrioid adenocarcinoma (EC), and to improve model interpretability with SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) analysis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We enrolled 241 patients with pathologically confirmed EC and divided them into training (n = 193) and test (n = 48) cohorts at an 8:2 ratio. Radiomic features were extracted from T2-weighted imaging (T2WI), apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC), and late-phase T1-weighted contrast-enhanced (T1CE) sequences. Feature screening was performed sequentially via intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) filtering, Pearson collinearity elimination, and 10-fold cross-validated least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression. Five machine learning models were constructed and evaluated via area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity. The optimal model was validated using decision curve analysis (DCA), and SHAP analysis was applied to interpret feature contributions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The MSI rate was 29% (70/241). Four features were retained after selection. The XGBoost model achieved the best performance (training AUC = 0.983, test AUC = 0.870), with test set accuracy of 0.812, sensitivity of 0.929, and specificity of 0.765. DCA confirmed clinical utility, SHAP analysis identified T2WI-GLSZM GrayLevelVariance as the most impactful feature and visualized the differences in feature contributions between MSI and MSS patients at the individual level, clarifying the model's decision-making logic.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The multiparametric MRI-based radiomics model enables noninvasive prediction of MSI in EC, potentially guiding personalized immunotherapy selection.</p>","PeriodicalId":9020,"journal":{"name":"BMC Medical Imaging","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13647760/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Medical Imaging","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12880-026-02585-9","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To develop and validate a multiparametric MRI-based radiomics model for noninvasive preoperative prediction of microsatellite instability (MSI) in patients with endometrioid adenocarcinoma (EC), and to improve model interpretability with SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) analysis.

Methods: We enrolled 241 patients with pathologically confirmed EC and divided them into training (n = 193) and test (n = 48) cohorts at an 8:2 ratio. Radiomic features were extracted from T2-weighted imaging (T2WI), apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC), and late-phase T1-weighted contrast-enhanced (T1CE) sequences. Feature screening was performed sequentially via intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) filtering, Pearson collinearity elimination, and 10-fold cross-validated least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression. Five machine learning models were constructed and evaluated via area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity. The optimal model was validated using decision curve analysis (DCA), and SHAP analysis was applied to interpret feature contributions.

Results: The MSI rate was 29% (70/241). Four features were retained after selection. The XGBoost model achieved the best performance (training AUC = 0.983, test AUC = 0.870), with test set accuracy of 0.812, sensitivity of 0.929, and specificity of 0.765. DCA confirmed clinical utility, SHAP analysis identified T2WI-GLSZM GrayLevelVariance as the most impactful feature and visualized the differences in feature contributions between MSI and MSS patients at the individual level, clarifying the model's decision-making logic.

Conclusion: The multiparametric MRI-based radiomics model enables noninvasive prediction of MSI in EC, potentially guiding personalized immunotherapy selection.

基于mri的放射组学可解释模型预测子宫内膜样腺癌的微卫星不稳定状态。
目的:建立并验证一种基于多参数mri的放射组学模型,用于子宫内膜样腺癌(EC)患者微卫星不稳定性(MSI)的无创术前预测,并通过SHapley加性解释(SHAP)分析提高模型的可解释性。方法:我们纳入了241例病理证实的EC患者,并将其按8:2的比例分为训练组(n = 193)和测试组(n = 48)。从t2加权成像(T2WI)、表观扩散系数(ADC)和晚期t1加权对比增强(T1CE)序列中提取放射学特征。通过类内相关系数(ICC)滤波、Pearson共线性消除和10倍交叉验证的最小绝对收缩和选择算子(LASSO)回归,依次进行特征筛选。构建了五种机器学习模型,并通过受试者工作特征曲线下面积(AUC)、准确性、灵敏度和特异性对其进行评估。采用决策曲线分析(DCA)对最优模型进行验证,并采用SHAP分析对特征贡献进行解释。结果:MSI率为29%(70/241)。选择后保留了四个特征。XGBoost模型表现最佳(训练AUC = 0.983,测试AUC = 0.870),测试集准确率为0.812,灵敏度为0.929,特异度为0.765。DCA证实了临床效用,SHAP分析确定T2WI-GLSZM GrayLevelVariance是最具影响力的特征,并将MSI和MSS患者在个体水平上的特征贡献差异可视化,阐明了模型的决策逻辑。结论:基于多参数mri的放射组学模型能够无创预测EC的MSI,可能指导个性化免疫治疗的选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Medical Imaging
BMC Medical Imaging RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING-
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
3.70%
发文量
198
审稿时长
27 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Medical Imaging is an open access journal publishing original peer-reviewed research articles in the development, evaluation, and use of imaging techniques and image processing tools to diagnose and manage disease.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书