Alireza Raissadati, Christopher Knoll, Donald Mattia, Bethany Wisotzkey, Lydia K Wright, Muhammad Shezad, Seth A Hollander
{"title":"Clinical Outcomes and Complications in Pediatric Ventricular Assist Devices Implanted as Bridge to Candidacy.","authors":"Alireza Raissadati, Christopher Knoll, Donald Mattia, Bethany Wisotzkey, Lydia K Wright, Muhammad Shezad, Seth A Hollander","doi":"10.1097/MAT.0000000000002787","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Although the bridge-to-transplant (BTT) is the most common ventricular assist device (VAD) strategy, rapidly declining patients receive VADs as a \"bridge to candidacy\" (BTC) as their transplant candidacy is assessed. However, a lack of outcomes data for this group hinders informed decision-making and counseling. We compared outcomes between BTT and BTC cohorts in a retrospective analysis of the Advanced Cardiac Therapies Improving Outcomes Network registry of VADs implanted between January 2012 and August 2023. Of the patients studied, 383 (28.7%) underwent a BTC implant at a median age of 10.3 years and a median weight of 33.2 kg. The most common indications were dilated cardiomyopathy/myocarditis (51.6%) and congenital heart disease (38.0%). Nearly one-third (29.3%) were on ECMO at the time of implant. Major bleeding, renal dysfunction, and respiratory failure were significantly more common among BTC patients (p = 0.001-0.03). Bridge to candidacy candidates died more frequently on the device (21.9% vs. 9.7%, p < 0.001) and underwent successful transplantation less often (75% BTT vs. 50.4% BTC, p < 0.001). In conclusion, BTC VAD patients have higher rates of major adverse events and death. These data will assist in counseling and clinical decision-making for these patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":8844,"journal":{"name":"ASAIO Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ASAIO Journal","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/MAT.0000000000002787","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Although the bridge-to-transplant (BTT) is the most common ventricular assist device (VAD) strategy, rapidly declining patients receive VADs as a "bridge to candidacy" (BTC) as their transplant candidacy is assessed. However, a lack of outcomes data for this group hinders informed decision-making and counseling. We compared outcomes between BTT and BTC cohorts in a retrospective analysis of the Advanced Cardiac Therapies Improving Outcomes Network registry of VADs implanted between January 2012 and August 2023. Of the patients studied, 383 (28.7%) underwent a BTC implant at a median age of 10.3 years and a median weight of 33.2 kg. The most common indications were dilated cardiomyopathy/myocarditis (51.6%) and congenital heart disease (38.0%). Nearly one-third (29.3%) were on ECMO at the time of implant. Major bleeding, renal dysfunction, and respiratory failure were significantly more common among BTC patients (p = 0.001-0.03). Bridge to candidacy candidates died more frequently on the device (21.9% vs. 9.7%, p < 0.001) and underwent successful transplantation less often (75% BTT vs. 50.4% BTC, p < 0.001). In conclusion, BTC VAD patients have higher rates of major adverse events and death. These data will assist in counseling and clinical decision-making for these patients.
虽然移植桥(BTT)是最常见的心室辅助装置(VAD)策略,但在评估其移植候选性时,快速下降的患者接受VAD作为“候选桥”(BTC)。然而,缺乏这一群体的结果数据阻碍了明智的决策和咨询。我们对2012年1月至2023年8月植入vad的先进心脏治疗改善结果网络注册表进行回顾性分析,比较BTT和BTC队列的结果。在研究的患者中,383例(28.7%)接受了BTC种植,中位年龄为10.3岁,中位体重为33.2 kg。最常见的适应症是扩张型心肌病/心肌炎(51.6%)和先天性心脏病(38.0%)。近三分之一(29.3%)的患者在植入时采用ECMO。大出血、肾功能不全和呼吸衰竭在BTC患者中更为常见(p = 0.001-0.03)。候选桥患者在器械上死亡的频率更高(21.9% vs. 9.7%, p < 0.001),移植成功率更低(75% BTT vs. 50.4% BTC, p < 0.001)。总之,BTC型VAD患者有较高的主要不良事件发生率和死亡率。这些数据将有助于这些患者的咨询和临床决策。
期刊介绍:
ASAIO Journal is in the forefront of artificial organ research and development. On the cutting edge of innovative technology, it features peer-reviewed articles of the highest quality that describe research, development, the most recent advances in the design of artificial organ devices and findings from initial testing. Bimonthly, the ASAIO Journal features state-of-the-art investigations, laboratory and clinical trials, and discussions and opinions from experts around the world.
The official publication of the American Society for Artificial Internal Organs.