Exploring Anti-Coincidence Technique for Scattering Contamination Rejection in a Simultaneous PET/SPECT Imaging System

IF 3.8 Q1 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Yifei Jin;Junwei Du;Simon R. Cherry;Ling-Jian Meng
{"title":"Exploring Anti-Coincidence Technique for Scattering Contamination Rejection in a Simultaneous PET/SPECT Imaging System","authors":"Yifei Jin;Junwei Du;Simon R. Cherry;Ling-Jian Meng","doi":"10.1109/TRPMS.2025.3649623","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Simultaneous PET/SPECT imaging instruments could enable comprehensive molecular characterization by combining the very high sensitivity and spatial resolution of PET with the ability to image a broad range of radionuclides, including therapeutic isotopes with SPECT. While PET and SPECT hardware can be integrated into a single hardware system, one of the major challenges in simultaneous PET/SPECT imaging is the down-scatter contamination from PET tracers, which can significantly degrade SPECT image quality and quantitative accuracy. In this study, we evaluated the efficacy of using anti-coincidence and active shielding techniques to reject the down-scatter contamination in SPECT data. Using GEANT4 simulations, we analyzed the performance tradeoffs resulting from different choices of active shielding component design, coincidence time windows, and SPECT detector materials (CZT versus GAGG). The anti-coincidence technique effectively rejected contamination events, achieving a signal-to-noise <inline-formula> <tex-math>$(\\mathbf {\\mathrm {SNR}})$ </tex-math></inline-formula> enhancement from 0.29 to 1.48 and noise equivalent count rate <inline-formula> <tex-math>$(\\mathbf {\\mathrm {NECR}})$ </tex-math></inline-formula> improvement from 41.3 to 89.1 cps with moderate active shielding. Even without active shielding, anti-coincidence alone significantly improved SPECT image quality (<inline-formula> <tex-math>$\\mathbf {\\mathrm {SNR}}$ </tex-math></inline-formula>: 1.38; <inline-formula> <tex-math>$\\mathbf {\\mathrm {NECR}}$ </tex-math></inline-formula>: 87.0 cps), making it practical for systems where shielding is constrained. In reconstructed images, anti-coincidence improved contrast from 0.78 (raw) to 0.96 and reduced noise from 1508 to 257 counts, outperforming traditional triple-energy-window (TEW) correction (contrast: 0.84; noise: 855). The anti-coincidence technique is also compatible with post-processing scatter corrections, offering a promising strategy for future hybrid PET/SPECT systems in both preclinical and clinical settings.","PeriodicalId":46807,"journal":{"name":"IEEE Transactions on Radiation and Plasma Medical Sciences","volume":"10 6","pages":"908-919"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/stamp/stamp.jsp?tp=&arnumber=11318973","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IEEE Transactions on Radiation and Plasma Medical Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/11318973/","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/12/30 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Simultaneous PET/SPECT imaging instruments could enable comprehensive molecular characterization by combining the very high sensitivity and spatial resolution of PET with the ability to image a broad range of radionuclides, including therapeutic isotopes with SPECT. While PET and SPECT hardware can be integrated into a single hardware system, one of the major challenges in simultaneous PET/SPECT imaging is the down-scatter contamination from PET tracers, which can significantly degrade SPECT image quality and quantitative accuracy. In this study, we evaluated the efficacy of using anti-coincidence and active shielding techniques to reject the down-scatter contamination in SPECT data. Using GEANT4 simulations, we analyzed the performance tradeoffs resulting from different choices of active shielding component design, coincidence time windows, and SPECT detector materials (CZT versus GAGG). The anti-coincidence technique effectively rejected contamination events, achieving a signal-to-noise $(\mathbf {\mathrm {SNR}})$ enhancement from 0.29 to 1.48 and noise equivalent count rate $(\mathbf {\mathrm {NECR}})$ improvement from 41.3 to 89.1 cps with moderate active shielding. Even without active shielding, anti-coincidence alone significantly improved SPECT image quality ( $\mathbf {\mathrm {SNR}}$ : 1.38; $\mathbf {\mathrm {NECR}}$ : 87.0 cps), making it practical for systems where shielding is constrained. In reconstructed images, anti-coincidence improved contrast from 0.78 (raw) to 0.96 and reduced noise from 1508 to 257 counts, outperforming traditional triple-energy-window (TEW) correction (contrast: 0.84; noise: 855). The anti-coincidence technique is also compatible with post-processing scatter corrections, offering a promising strategy for future hybrid PET/SPECT systems in both preclinical and clinical settings.
PET/SPECT同步成像系统中散射污染抑制的反重合技术研究
同时PET/SPECT成像仪器可以通过结合PET的高灵敏度和空间分辨率以及广泛的放射性核素成像能力来实现全面的分子表征,包括SPECT的治疗性同位素。虽然PET和SPECT硬件可以集成到一个硬件系统中,但同时进行PET/SPECT成像的主要挑战之一是PET示踪剂的下散射污染,这会严重降低SPECT图像质量和定量精度。在这项研究中,我们评估了使用反重合和主动屏蔽技术来拒绝SPECT数据中的下散射污染的有效性。使用GEANT4模拟,我们分析了不同选择的有源屏蔽元件设计、符合时间窗和SPECT探测器材料(CZT与GAGG)导致的性能权衡。反符合技术有效地拒绝了污染事件,实现了信噪比$(\mathbf {\ mathm {SNR}})$从0.29提高到1.48,噪声等效计数率$(\mathbf {\ mathm {NECR}})$从41.3提高到89.1 cps,具有中等主动屏蔽。即使没有主动屏蔽,单独抗巧合也能显著提高SPECT图像质量($\mathbf {\ mathm {SNR}}$: 1.38; $\mathbf {\ mathm {NECR}}$: 87.0 cps),使其适用于屏蔽受限的系统。在重建图像中,反重合将对比度从0.78(原始)提高到0.96,将噪声从1508降至257,优于传统的三重能量窗(TEW)校正(对比度:0.84,噪声:855)。反重合技术也与后处理散射校正兼容,为临床前和临床设置的未来混合PET/SPECT系统提供了一个有前途的策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
IEEE Transactions on Radiation and Plasma Medical Sciences
IEEE Transactions on Radiation and Plasma Medical Sciences RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING-
CiteScore
8.00
自引率
18.20%
发文量
109
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书