Ane Francyne Costa, Lucas Valentim Silveira, Fabiana Botelho de Miranda Onofre, Alexandre Sherlley Casimiro Onofre
{"title":"Psychological stress and semen quality impairment: A systematic review.","authors":"Ane Francyne Costa, Lucas Valentim Silveira, Fabiana Botelho de Miranda Onofre, Alexandre Sherlley Casimiro Onofre","doi":"10.5935/1518-0557.20260023","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aim of this review was to evaluate the extent to which psychological stress may adversely affect seminal quality parameters in men.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic review was conducted across databases including Embase, PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science. Studies were subjected to data extraction, risk of bias, and narrative synthesis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 34 studies were included in this review. Three (8.82%) studies were judged to be at a high risk of bias. Included studies were published between 1988 and 2023 and concerned a total of 11,141 participants, ranging from 20 to 1,362 participants per study. Psychological stress negatively impacted semen volume in 12.9% of studies, sperm concentration in 52.9%, total sperm count in 56.3%, sperm motility in 63.3%, and sperm morphology in 21.4%. Sources of psychological stress such as academic stress, daily life stress, infertility-related stress, stressful life events, and work-related stress were correlated to impairment of semen parameters in 70.6% of included studies. The ability to draw robust conclusions is severely restricted by significant heterogeneity across the reviewed literature.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This systematic review found that psychological stress is frequently associated with impaired semen parameters, particularly sperm concentration and sperm motility. Nevertheless, these findings should be interpreted with caution. Most of the reported associations are observational and do not establish a definitive causal relationship between psychological stress and semen quality impairment.</p>","PeriodicalId":520656,"journal":{"name":"JBRA assisted reproduction","volume":" ","pages":"628-640"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13544271/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JBRA assisted reproduction","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5935/1518-0557.20260023","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: The aim of this review was to evaluate the extent to which psychological stress may adversely affect seminal quality parameters in men.
Methods: A systematic review was conducted across databases including Embase, PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science. Studies were subjected to data extraction, risk of bias, and narrative synthesis.
Results: A total of 34 studies were included in this review. Three (8.82%) studies were judged to be at a high risk of bias. Included studies were published between 1988 and 2023 and concerned a total of 11,141 participants, ranging from 20 to 1,362 participants per study. Psychological stress negatively impacted semen volume in 12.9% of studies, sperm concentration in 52.9%, total sperm count in 56.3%, sperm motility in 63.3%, and sperm morphology in 21.4%. Sources of psychological stress such as academic stress, daily life stress, infertility-related stress, stressful life events, and work-related stress were correlated to impairment of semen parameters in 70.6% of included studies. The ability to draw robust conclusions is severely restricted by significant heterogeneity across the reviewed literature.
Conclusions: This systematic review found that psychological stress is frequently associated with impaired semen parameters, particularly sperm concentration and sperm motility. Nevertheless, these findings should be interpreted with caution. Most of the reported associations are observational and do not establish a definitive causal relationship between psychological stress and semen quality impairment.
目的:本综述的目的是评估心理压力对男性精液质量参数的不利影响程度。方法:对Embase、PubMed、Scopus和Web of Science等数据库进行系统评价。研究受到数据提取、偏倚风险和叙述综合的影响。结果:本综述共纳入34项研究。3项(8.82%)研究被判定为高偏倚风险。纳入的研究发表于1988年至2023年之间,共涉及11141名参与者,每项研究的参与者从20人到1362人不等。在12.9%的研究中,心理压力对精液体积、精子浓度、精子总数、精子活力和精子形态均有负面影响,分别为52.9%、56.3%、63.3%和21.4%。在纳入的研究中,70.6%的心理压力来源(如学业压力、日常生活压力、不孕相关压力、生活压力事件和工作压力)与精液参数受损相关。在回顾的文献中,显著的异质性严重限制了得出可靠结论的能力。结论:本系统综述发现,心理压力通常与精液参数受损有关,尤其是精子浓度和精子活力受损。然而,这些发现应该谨慎解读。大多数报道的关联都是观察性的,并没有在心理压力和精液质量损害之间建立明确的因果关系。