Lizzy Winstone, James Parsonage, Cassey Muir, Amie Randhawa, Lauren Cross, Georgie MacArthur, Evangelina Asiedu-Addo, Emma Garavini
{"title":"Adolescents' Experiences of Social Media Content Types and Wellbeing: A Photo-Elicitation Interview Study.","authors":"Lizzy Winstone, James Parsonage, Cassey Muir, Amie Randhawa, Lauren Cross, Georgie MacArthur, Evangelina Asiedu-Addo, Emma Garavini","doi":"10.1002/jad.70231","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Adolescents' experiences of social media are increasingly shaped by algorithmic recommendation systems that structure repeated exposure to diverse content types. However, research has focused predominantly on screen time, with limited attention to the diverse types of content encountered within curated feeds or how these experiences intersect with developmental processes such as identity formation, social evaluation, and emotional regulation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Semi-structured photo-elicitation interviews were conducted in 2025 with 27 adolescents aged 14-19 years in the United Kingdom (mean age = 17.15 years, SD = 1.49; 70% self-described female). Participants shared screenshots from their TikTok For You or Instagram Explore pages to support discussion of algorithmically recommended content. Data were analysed using reflexive thematic analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seven content types were identified: entertainment, consumerism, identity-related, mental health, news and activism, body image, and AI-generated content. All were experienced as double-edged, with perceived benefits and risks shaped by repeated algorithmic exposure, developmental stage, emotional state, and individual context. Participants frequently reflected retrospectively on earlier social media experiences, identifying younger adolescence as a period of particular vulnerability. Perceived impacts were closely connected to developmental processes including identity formation, social evaluation, and emotional regulation, with younger adolescents perceived as less equipped to critically evaluate content or manage algorithmic exposure.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Adolescents' wellbeing in relation to social media appears shaped by the types of content repeatedly encountered and the developmental context in which exposure occurs. Research, education, and platform design should address the quality, recurrence, and emotional consequences of algorithmically curated content exposure across adolescence.</p>","PeriodicalId":48397,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Adolescence","volume":" ","pages":"2503-2514"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13643666/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Adolescence","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/jad.70231","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/7/14 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Adolescents' experiences of social media are increasingly shaped by algorithmic recommendation systems that structure repeated exposure to diverse content types. However, research has focused predominantly on screen time, with limited attention to the diverse types of content encountered within curated feeds or how these experiences intersect with developmental processes such as identity formation, social evaluation, and emotional regulation.
Methods: Semi-structured photo-elicitation interviews were conducted in 2025 with 27 adolescents aged 14-19 years in the United Kingdom (mean age = 17.15 years, SD = 1.49; 70% self-described female). Participants shared screenshots from their TikTok For You or Instagram Explore pages to support discussion of algorithmically recommended content. Data were analysed using reflexive thematic analysis.
Results: Seven content types were identified: entertainment, consumerism, identity-related, mental health, news and activism, body image, and AI-generated content. All were experienced as double-edged, with perceived benefits and risks shaped by repeated algorithmic exposure, developmental stage, emotional state, and individual context. Participants frequently reflected retrospectively on earlier social media experiences, identifying younger adolescence as a period of particular vulnerability. Perceived impacts were closely connected to developmental processes including identity formation, social evaluation, and emotional regulation, with younger adolescents perceived as less equipped to critically evaluate content or manage algorithmic exposure.
Conclusions: Adolescents' wellbeing in relation to social media appears shaped by the types of content repeatedly encountered and the developmental context in which exposure occurs. Research, education, and platform design should address the quality, recurrence, and emotional consequences of algorithmically curated content exposure across adolescence.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Adolescence is an international, broad based, cross-disciplinary journal that addresses issues of professional and academic importance concerning development between puberty and the attainment of adult status within society. It provides a forum for all who are concerned with the nature of adolescence, whether involved in teaching, research, guidance, counseling, treatment, or other services. The aim of the journal is to encourage research and foster good practice through publishing both empirical and clinical studies as well as integrative reviews and theoretical advances.