Exploring Parental Views of Remote Vision Testing in Children.

Q3 Medicine
British and Irish Orthoptic Journal Pub Date : 2026-07-06 eCollection Date: 2026-01-01 DOI:10.22599/bioj.541
Kiran Pannu-Dhillon, Ahalya Subramanian, Miriam Conway
{"title":"Exploring Parental Views of Remote Vision Testing in Children.","authors":"Kiran Pannu-Dhillon, Ahalya Subramanian, Miriam Conway","doi":"10.22599/bioj.541","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The rise of digital technologies has enabled vision testing via applications on phones, tablets, and computers, allowing assessments beyond clinical settings. While these tools empower parents to test their children's vision at home, little is known about the attitudes of parents in the United Kingdom (UK) toward this approach. This study examines parents perceived benefits and challenges of conducting vision tests for young children at home, either independently or with the help of a qualified clinician.</p><p><strong>Research aim: </strong>This qualitative study explores parents' perspectives on at-home remote vision testing in a paediatric population.</p><p><strong>Methodology: </strong>Data was collected via two online focus groups with parents of children aged 4-8 years old. Sessions were recorded, transcribed, and thematically coded to identify key patterns and themes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Five key themes emerged: navigating trust in remote vision testing, impact of child demographics, desire for professional support, digital enablers and barriers, and appointment frequency influences desire for remote testing. Parents emphasised the need for training in remote vision testing to build confidence and skill. Potential benefits included reduced travel, time off work/school, and greater flexibility. Concerns around test accuracy, occlusion, and application use highlight the need for clear guidance and virtual supervision by professionals.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Remote vision testing could be a reliable alternative to clinic visits, provided parents receive adequate training and support. Participants expressed concerns about the reliability of remote vision testing, particularly for younger or less cooperative children, but acknowledged benefits such as reduced travel, lower costs, and greater flexibility. While app-based testing was appealing, most preferred professional involvement, either in person or virtually, to ensure accuracy, reassurance, and follow-up support.</p>","PeriodicalId":36083,"journal":{"name":"British and Irish Orthoptic Journal","volume":"22 1","pages":"139-149"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13361081/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British and Irish Orthoptic Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22599/bioj.541","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The rise of digital technologies has enabled vision testing via applications on phones, tablets, and computers, allowing assessments beyond clinical settings. While these tools empower parents to test their children's vision at home, little is known about the attitudes of parents in the United Kingdom (UK) toward this approach. This study examines parents perceived benefits and challenges of conducting vision tests for young children at home, either independently or with the help of a qualified clinician.

Research aim: This qualitative study explores parents' perspectives on at-home remote vision testing in a paediatric population.

Methodology: Data was collected via two online focus groups with parents of children aged 4-8 years old. Sessions were recorded, transcribed, and thematically coded to identify key patterns and themes.

Results: Five key themes emerged: navigating trust in remote vision testing, impact of child demographics, desire for professional support, digital enablers and barriers, and appointment frequency influences desire for remote testing. Parents emphasised the need for training in remote vision testing to build confidence and skill. Potential benefits included reduced travel, time off work/school, and greater flexibility. Concerns around test accuracy, occlusion, and application use highlight the need for clear guidance and virtual supervision by professionals.

Conclusion: Remote vision testing could be a reliable alternative to clinic visits, provided parents receive adequate training and support. Participants expressed concerns about the reliability of remote vision testing, particularly for younger or less cooperative children, but acknowledged benefits such as reduced travel, lower costs, and greater flexibility. While app-based testing was appealing, most preferred professional involvement, either in person or virtually, to ensure accuracy, reassurance, and follow-up support.

探讨家长对儿童远程视力测试的看法。
背景:数字技术的兴起使得通过手机、平板电脑和电脑上的应用程序进行视力测试成为可能,从而使评估超越了临床环境。虽然这些工具使父母能够在家里测试孩子的视力,但人们对英国父母对这种方法的态度知之甚少。本研究调查了父母认为在家中为幼儿进行视力测试的好处和挑战,无论是独立的还是在合格临床医生的帮助下。研究目的:本定性研究探讨家长对儿童家庭远程视力测试的看法。方法:数据通过两个在线焦点小组与4-8岁儿童的父母收集。会议记录、转录和主题编码,以确定关键模式和主题。结果:出现了五个关键主题:远程视力测试中的导航信任,儿童人口统计学的影响,对专业支持的渴望,数字化的促成因素和障碍,预约频率影响远程测试的渴望。家长们强调需要进行远程视力测试培训,以建立信心和技能。潜在的好处包括减少旅行,有时间工作/上学,以及更大的灵活性。对测试准确性、遮挡和应用程序使用的关注突出了专业人员明确指导和虚拟监督的必要性。结论:如果家长得到充分的培训和支持,远程视力检查可以替代门诊就诊。与会者对远程视力测试的可靠性表示关切,特别是对年龄较小或不太合作的儿童,但也承认其好处,如减少旅行、降低成本和更大的灵活性。虽然基于应用程序的测试很有吸引力,但大多数人更喜欢专业人士的参与,无论是亲自还是虚拟的,以确保准确性、保证和后续支持。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
British and Irish Orthoptic Journal
British and Irish Orthoptic Journal Health Professions-Optometry
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
13
审稿时长
18 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书