Single-Incision Laparoscopic Hartmann's Reversal Using the Stoma Site in a Patient with Perioperative Anaphylaxis.

IF 0.7 Q4 SURGERY
Surgical Case Reports Pub Date : 2026-01-01 Epub Date: 2026-07-01 DOI:10.70352/scrj.cr.26-0206
Tsubasa Yanagihara, Ryohei Shoji, Yusuke Yoshida, Nobuhiko Kanaya, Yuki Matsumi, Kunitoshi Shigeyasu, Yoshitaka Kondo, Toshiyoshi Fujiwara
{"title":"Single-Incision Laparoscopic Hartmann's Reversal Using the Stoma Site in a Patient with Perioperative Anaphylaxis.","authors":"Tsubasa Yanagihara, Ryohei Shoji, Yusuke Yoshida, Nobuhiko Kanaya, Yuki Matsumi, Kunitoshi Shigeyasu, Yoshitaka Kondo, Toshiyoshi Fujiwara","doi":"10.70352/scrj.cr.26-0206","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Reversal of Hartmann's procedure is associated with substantial morbidity, and further reduction of surgical invasiveness may be beneficial in selected patients. Perioperative anaphylaxis caused by anesthetic agents or skin antiseptics poses a significant challenge to surgical management. We report a case of stoma-site single-incision laparoscopic Hartmann's reversal (HR) performed in a patient with severe perioperative allergies.</p><p><strong>Case presentation: </strong>A 73-year-old woman underwent an emergency open Hartmann's procedure with partial cystectomy for perforated sigmoid colon cancer with bladder invasion. After adjuvant chemotherapy, she developed a progressively enlarging giant parastomal hernia that significantly impaired daily activities. Two attempts at HR were aborted because of perioperative anaphylactic shock. Subsequent allergy evaluations suggested rocuronium and chlorhexidine as causative agents, and povidone-iodine was also avoided based on clinical history. Approximately 14 months after the initial surgery, single-incision laparoscopic HR using the stoma site was successfully performed under general anesthesia without neuromuscular blocking agents. Preoperative skin antisepsis was performed using benzalkonium chloride, avoiding both chlorhexidine and povidone-iodine. No additional abdominal incisions were required. The operative time was 2 h 56 min, with minimal blood loss. The postoperative course was uneventful and she was discharged on POD 9.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Stoma-site single-incision laparoscopic HR may represent a useful surgical option for selected patients with severe perioperative allergies to anesthetic agents and skin antiseptics, in whom minimizing abdominal approach and wound-related risks is particularly important.</p>","PeriodicalId":22096,"journal":{"name":"Surgical Case Reports","volume":"12 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13333322/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Surgical Case Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.70352/scrj.cr.26-0206","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/7/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Reversal of Hartmann's procedure is associated with substantial morbidity, and further reduction of surgical invasiveness may be beneficial in selected patients. Perioperative anaphylaxis caused by anesthetic agents or skin antiseptics poses a significant challenge to surgical management. We report a case of stoma-site single-incision laparoscopic Hartmann's reversal (HR) performed in a patient with severe perioperative allergies.

Case presentation: A 73-year-old woman underwent an emergency open Hartmann's procedure with partial cystectomy for perforated sigmoid colon cancer with bladder invasion. After adjuvant chemotherapy, she developed a progressively enlarging giant parastomal hernia that significantly impaired daily activities. Two attempts at HR were aborted because of perioperative anaphylactic shock. Subsequent allergy evaluations suggested rocuronium and chlorhexidine as causative agents, and povidone-iodine was also avoided based on clinical history. Approximately 14 months after the initial surgery, single-incision laparoscopic HR using the stoma site was successfully performed under general anesthesia without neuromuscular blocking agents. Preoperative skin antisepsis was performed using benzalkonium chloride, avoiding both chlorhexidine and povidone-iodine. No additional abdominal incisions were required. The operative time was 2 h 56 min, with minimal blood loss. The postoperative course was uneventful and she was discharged on POD 9.

Conclusions: Stoma-site single-incision laparoscopic HR may represent a useful surgical option for selected patients with severe perioperative allergies to anesthetic agents and skin antiseptics, in whom minimizing abdominal approach and wound-related risks is particularly important.

围手术期过敏反应患者的单切口腹腔镜哈特曼反切术。
哈特曼手术的逆转与大量的发病率相关,进一步减少手术侵入性可能对某些患者有益。麻醉药物或皮肤防腐剂引起的围手术期过敏反应对外科治疗提出了重大挑战。我们报告一个病例的造口部位单切口腹腔镜哈特曼逆转(HR)进行了病人严重的围手术期过敏。病例介绍:一名73岁妇女因乙状结肠穿孔伴膀胱侵犯,接受紧急开腹哈特曼手术加部分膀胱切除术。在辅助化疗后,她出现了逐渐扩大的巨大造口旁疝,严重影响了日常活动。两次HR尝试因围手术期过敏性休克而流产。随后的过敏评价提示罗库溴铵和氯己定为病原体,根据临床病史避免使用聚维酮碘。初次手术后大约14个月,在全身麻醉下成功地使用造口部位进行了单切口腹腔镜HR,没有使用神经肌肉阻断剂。术前使用苯扎氯铵进行皮肤消毒,避免使用氯己定和聚维酮碘。不需要额外的腹部切口。手术时间2小时56分钟,出血量极少。术后过程顺利,于第9天出院。结论:对于围手术期对麻醉剂和皮肤防腐剂严重过敏的患者,造口部位单切口腹腔镜HR可能是一种有用的手术选择,在这些患者中,减少腹部入路和伤口相关风险尤为重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
218
审稿时长
13 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书