Chiara Degan, Rebecca A Tobin, Sharon I de Vries, Albert Jiménez-Requena, Amela Peco, Michela Guglieri, Jordi Diaz-Manera, Yuri E M van der Burgt, Bart J M van Vlijmen, Yetrib Hathout, Cristina Al-Khalili Szigyarto, Utkarsh J Dang, Roula Tsonaka, Pietro Spitali
{"title":"Evaluation of a serum protein signature as monitoring biomarker for Duchenne muscular dystrophy in a long-term clinical trial with corticosteroids.","authors":"Chiara Degan, Rebecca A Tobin, Sharon I de Vries, Albert Jiménez-Requena, Amela Peco, Michela Guglieri, Jordi Diaz-Manera, Yuri E M van der Burgt, Bart J M van Vlijmen, Yetrib Hathout, Cristina Al-Khalili Szigyarto, Utkarsh J Dang, Roula Tsonaka, Pietro Spitali","doi":"10.1186/s13395-026-00437-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD) is a progressive neuromuscular disorder for which monitoring biomarkers are urgently needed. We aimed to evaluate whether proteins in serum can accurately monitor patients' function within the duration of a clinical trial.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this study, we evaluated longitudinal serum proteins of DMD patients participating in the FOR-DMD clinical trial, comparing daily and intermittent corticosteroid regimens in boys aged 4-8 years at baseline. Using the aptamer-based protein platform SomaScan, we profiled 1500 proteins. Associations between protein levels and motor function outcomes, such as Rise from the Floor Velocity (RFV), 10-Meter Run/Walk Velocity (10MRWV), and North Star Ambulatory Assessment (NSAA), were assessed using linear mixed models. In particular, we explored whether patients with higher protein levels also tended to have better functional scores (across-patients analysis), and whether changes in protein levels within the same patient over time were linked to changes in their functional performance (within-patient analysis). Finally, penalized (lasso) mixed models were applied to evaluate the predictive function of the proteins. The prediction accuracy of the models (evaluated by optimism-corrected Root Mean Squared Error) was compared to that of a simpler model with only age and treatment as predictors.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Across-patients and within-patient analyses revealed consistent associations with three functional tests for a subset of proteins, notably RGMA, ART3, ANTXR2, and CFB. Multivariate models incorporating the proteins significantly associated with at least two tests, improved prediction accuracy by 12% for NSAA, and by 33-35% for RFV and 10MRWV. These models also revealed a subset of proteins that were consistently selected. Quantification of CFB, RGMA, ANTXR2, SERPINF1 and ATP5PF using SomaScan showed strong agreement with measurements obtained using orthogonal methods such as ELISA, MRM-MS and an in-house developed bead-based sandwich immunoassay.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These findings support the utility of serum protein signatures as objective, quantitative tools for monitoring disease progression and treatment response in DMD during clinical visits and clinical trials.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>The FOR-DMD clinical trial was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (registration no. NCT01603407). First submission: 03/04/2012.</p>","PeriodicalId":21747,"journal":{"name":"Skeletal Muscle","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Skeletal Muscle","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13395-026-00437-2","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CELL BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD) is a progressive neuromuscular disorder for which monitoring biomarkers are urgently needed. We aimed to evaluate whether proteins in serum can accurately monitor patients' function within the duration of a clinical trial.
Methods: In this study, we evaluated longitudinal serum proteins of DMD patients participating in the FOR-DMD clinical trial, comparing daily and intermittent corticosteroid regimens in boys aged 4-8 years at baseline. Using the aptamer-based protein platform SomaScan, we profiled 1500 proteins. Associations between protein levels and motor function outcomes, such as Rise from the Floor Velocity (RFV), 10-Meter Run/Walk Velocity (10MRWV), and North Star Ambulatory Assessment (NSAA), were assessed using linear mixed models. In particular, we explored whether patients with higher protein levels also tended to have better functional scores (across-patients analysis), and whether changes in protein levels within the same patient over time were linked to changes in their functional performance (within-patient analysis). Finally, penalized (lasso) mixed models were applied to evaluate the predictive function of the proteins. The prediction accuracy of the models (evaluated by optimism-corrected Root Mean Squared Error) was compared to that of a simpler model with only age and treatment as predictors.
Results: Across-patients and within-patient analyses revealed consistent associations with three functional tests for a subset of proteins, notably RGMA, ART3, ANTXR2, and CFB. Multivariate models incorporating the proteins significantly associated with at least two tests, improved prediction accuracy by 12% for NSAA, and by 33-35% for RFV and 10MRWV. These models also revealed a subset of proteins that were consistently selected. Quantification of CFB, RGMA, ANTXR2, SERPINF1 and ATP5PF using SomaScan showed strong agreement with measurements obtained using orthogonal methods such as ELISA, MRM-MS and an in-house developed bead-based sandwich immunoassay.
Conclusions: These findings support the utility of serum protein signatures as objective, quantitative tools for monitoring disease progression and treatment response in DMD during clinical visits and clinical trials.
Trial registration: The FOR-DMD clinical trial was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (registration no. NCT01603407). First submission: 03/04/2012.
期刊介绍:
The only open access journal in its field, Skeletal Muscle publishes novel, cutting-edge research and technological advancements that investigate the molecular mechanisms underlying the biology of skeletal muscle. Reflecting the breadth of research in this area, the journal welcomes manuscripts about the development, metabolism, the regulation of mass and function, aging, degeneration, dystrophy and regeneration of skeletal muscle, with an emphasis on understanding adult skeletal muscle, its maintenance, and its interactions with non-muscle cell types and regulatory modulators.
Main areas of interest include:
-differentiation of skeletal muscle-
atrophy and hypertrophy of skeletal muscle-
aging of skeletal muscle-
regeneration and degeneration of skeletal muscle-
biology of satellite and satellite-like cells-
dystrophic degeneration of skeletal muscle-
energy and glucose homeostasis in skeletal muscle-
non-dystrophic genetic diseases of skeletal muscle, such as Spinal Muscular Atrophy and myopathies-
maintenance of neuromuscular junctions-
roles of ryanodine receptors and calcium signaling in skeletal muscle-
roles of nuclear receptors in skeletal muscle-
roles of GPCRs and GPCR signaling in skeletal muscle-
other relevant aspects of skeletal muscle biology.
In addition, articles on translational clinical studies that address molecular and cellular mechanisms of skeletal muscle will be published. Case reports are also encouraged for submission.
Skeletal Muscle reflects the breadth of research on skeletal muscle and bridges gaps between diverse areas of science for example cardiac cell biology and neurobiology, which share common features with respect to cell differentiation, excitatory membranes, cell-cell communication, and maintenance. Suitable articles are model and mechanism-driven, and apply statistical principles where appropriate; purely descriptive studies are of lesser interest.