The Robosling Technique in Robotic Radical Prostatectomy Promotes Early and Sustained Return of Continence in Elderly Patients.

IF 2.4 Q2 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Research and Reports in Urology Pub Date : 2026-07-02 eCollection Date: 2026-01-01 DOI:10.2147/RRU.S599921
Victor Yu, Damien Gibson, Juliette Cotte, Amer Amin, Lewis Chan, Nariman Ahmadi, Nicola Jeffery, Ruban Thanigasalam, Scott Leslie
{"title":"The Robosling Technique in Robotic Radical Prostatectomy Promotes Early and Sustained Return of Continence in Elderly Patients.","authors":"Victor Yu, Damien Gibson, Juliette Cotte, Amer Amin, Lewis Chan, Nariman Ahmadi, Nicola Jeffery, Ruban Thanigasalam, Scott Leslie","doi":"10.2147/RRU.S599921","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>The Robosling technique is a novel autologous fascial sling which supports the urethrovesical anastomosis in robotic radical prostatectomy (RARP) and has shown promise in improving early continence. Although curative surgery for prostate cancer is uncommonly offered to elderly patients aged ≥75, increase in active surveillance and overall life expectancy challenges this paradigm, though continence remains a challenge in this cohort. We sought to investigate the role of the Robosling technique in elderly patients to promote early return of continence.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Our prospective RARP database (2016-2023) was analysed, recording demographic, surgical, pathological and functional outcomes. The primary endpoint was defined as pad-free continence, 1-year post-operatively. Patients aged ≥75 undergoing RARP with or without Robosling were compared using Chi-square/Fisher-exact and <i>t</i>-tests with <i>p</i><0.05 considered significant. Multinomial logistic regression was performed to account for confounders.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>62 patients were included in the analysis (Robosling n=24). No significant differences were detected in surgical or pathological outcomes. Robosling was associated with improved pad-free continence rates from 6-months post-operatively (62.5% vs 30.0%, <i>p</i>=0.018) and sustained at 1-year (79.2% vs 30.0%, <i>p</i><0.01). Mean pad-use was lower in the Robosling cohort at all time points (0.21 vs 1.0 pads at 1-year, <i>p</i><0.05). On multivariate analysis, Robosling remained independently associated with improved pad-free continence (OR 0.11, 95% CI 0.03-0.37, p<0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The Robosling technique is associated with significantly improved early and sustained pad-free continence rates in the elderly population in this single-surgeon study. While patient selection remains paramount, this intraoperative technique may mitigate a key quality-of-life concern in this cohort.</p>","PeriodicalId":21008,"journal":{"name":"Research and Reports in Urology","volume":"18 ","pages":"599921"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13335830/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research and Reports in Urology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/RRU.S599921","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: The Robosling technique is a novel autologous fascial sling which supports the urethrovesical anastomosis in robotic radical prostatectomy (RARP) and has shown promise in improving early continence. Although curative surgery for prostate cancer is uncommonly offered to elderly patients aged ≥75, increase in active surveillance and overall life expectancy challenges this paradigm, though continence remains a challenge in this cohort. We sought to investigate the role of the Robosling technique in elderly patients to promote early return of continence.

Methods: Our prospective RARP database (2016-2023) was analysed, recording demographic, surgical, pathological and functional outcomes. The primary endpoint was defined as pad-free continence, 1-year post-operatively. Patients aged ≥75 undergoing RARP with or without Robosling were compared using Chi-square/Fisher-exact and t-tests with p<0.05 considered significant. Multinomial logistic regression was performed to account for confounders.

Results: 62 patients were included in the analysis (Robosling n=24). No significant differences were detected in surgical or pathological outcomes. Robosling was associated with improved pad-free continence rates from 6-months post-operatively (62.5% vs 30.0%, p=0.018) and sustained at 1-year (79.2% vs 30.0%, p<0.01). Mean pad-use was lower in the Robosling cohort at all time points (0.21 vs 1.0 pads at 1-year, p<0.05). On multivariate analysis, Robosling remained independently associated with improved pad-free continence (OR 0.11, 95% CI 0.03-0.37, p<0.001).

Conclusion: The Robosling technique is associated with significantly improved early and sustained pad-free continence rates in the elderly population in this single-surgeon study. While patient selection remains paramount, this intraoperative technique may mitigate a key quality-of-life concern in this cohort.

机器人根治性前列腺切除术中的机械臂技术促进老年患者早期和持续的尿失禁恢复。
目的:Robosling技术是一种在机器人根治性前列腺切除术(RARP)中支持尿道膀胱吻合术的新型自体筋膜吊带,在改善早期尿失禁方面具有良好的前景。尽管前列腺癌的根治性手术很少被提供给≥75岁的老年患者,但主动监测和总体预期寿命的增加挑战了这一范式,尽管在该队列中尿失禁仍然是一个挑战。我们试图研究Robosling技术在老年患者中促进失禁早期恢复的作用。方法:对我们的前瞻性RARP数据库(2016-2023)进行分析,记录人口统计学、手术、病理和功能结果。主要终点为术后1年无尿失禁。年龄≥75岁接受RARP的患者合并或不合并Robosling,采用卡方/ fisher -精确检验和t检验进行比较。结果:62例患者纳入分析(Robosling n=24)。在手术或病理结果方面未发现显著差异。Robosling与术后6个月无尿垫失禁率的改善相关(62.5% vs 30.0%, p=0.018),并持续1年(79.2% vs 30.0%, ppp)。结论:在这项单外科医生研究中,Robosling技术与老年人群早期和持续无尿垫失禁率的显著改善相关。虽然患者选择仍然是最重要的,但这种术中技术可能减轻该队列中一个关键的生活质量问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Research and Reports in Urology
Research and Reports in Urology UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY-
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
60
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: Research and Reports in Urology is an international, peer-reviewed, open access, online journal. Publishing original research, reports, editorials, reviews and commentaries on all aspects of adult and pediatric urology in the clinic and laboratory including the following topics: Pathology, pathophysiology of urological disease Investigation and treatment of urological disease Pharmacology of drugs used for the treatment of urological disease Although the main focus of the journal is to publish research and clinical results in humans; preclinical, animal and in vitro studies will be published where they will shed light on disease processes and potential new therapies. Issues of patient safety and quality of care will also be considered.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书