Typing to the beat of inner speech: The embodied representation of speech prosody in keystroke rhythmic patterns.

IF 2.9 3区 心理学 Q3 NEUROSCIENCES
Neuropsychology Pub Date : 2026-09-01 Epub Date: 2026-07-13 DOI:10.1037/neu0001108
Yael Goldstein-Marcusohn, Zohar Eviatar, Hamutal Kreiner
{"title":"Typing to the beat of inner speech: The embodied representation of speech prosody in keystroke rhythmic patterns.","authors":"Yael Goldstein-Marcusohn, Zohar Eviatar, Hamutal Kreiner","doi":"10.1037/neu0001108","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study investigated whether inner speech reflects an embodied representation by examining whether prosodic features of spoken sentences, specifically tempo and pitch, affect motor behavior during typing.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Across two experiments, participants listened to sentences varying in structure and emotional tone, silently repeated them, and then typed them. Acoustic features (tempo and pitch) were extracted from the spoken sentences. During typing, motor measures, including typing speed and key pressure, were recorded.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We found that spoken word duration robustly predicted mean interkey interval (Experiment 1: β = 113.183, <i>p</i> < .001; Experiment 2: β = 95.857, <i>p</i> < .001). In practical terms, this corresponds to approximately an additional ∼11 ms (Experiment 1) or ∼10 ms (Experiment 2) in mean interkeystroke interval for every 0.1 s increase in spoken word duration. In the emotional manipulation, pitch predicted typing pressure (β = 0.586, <i>p</i> < .001). Overall, faster tempo was associated with shorter spoken words, and pressure covaried weakly with prosodic prominence in line with the auditory materials. These converging findings are consistent with the idea that covert speech simulations can preserve prosodic detail and that this detail can be expressed in typing dynamics; however, the present design is correlational and does not establish causality. In both experiments, typing speed was jointly predicted by speech tempo and sentence length. In emotionally intoned sentences, higher acoustic pitch was associated with increased typing pressure.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The findings suggest that inner speech may preserve prosodic features of spoken language and that these features can covary with motor output during typing. The results are consistent with an embodied/grounded account in which covert speech engages sensorimotor systems, but the present paradigm does not isolate a causal role for inner speech. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2026 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":19205,"journal":{"name":"Neuropsychology","volume":" ","pages":"664-674"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neuropsychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/neu0001108","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/7/13 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: This study investigated whether inner speech reflects an embodied representation by examining whether prosodic features of spoken sentences, specifically tempo and pitch, affect motor behavior during typing.

Method: Across two experiments, participants listened to sentences varying in structure and emotional tone, silently repeated them, and then typed them. Acoustic features (tempo and pitch) were extracted from the spoken sentences. During typing, motor measures, including typing speed and key pressure, were recorded.

Results: We found that spoken word duration robustly predicted mean interkey interval (Experiment 1: β = 113.183, p < .001; Experiment 2: β = 95.857, p < .001). In practical terms, this corresponds to approximately an additional ∼11 ms (Experiment 1) or ∼10 ms (Experiment 2) in mean interkeystroke interval for every 0.1 s increase in spoken word duration. In the emotional manipulation, pitch predicted typing pressure (β = 0.586, p < .001). Overall, faster tempo was associated with shorter spoken words, and pressure covaried weakly with prosodic prominence in line with the auditory materials. These converging findings are consistent with the idea that covert speech simulations can preserve prosodic detail and that this detail can be expressed in typing dynamics; however, the present design is correlational and does not establish causality. In both experiments, typing speed was jointly predicted by speech tempo and sentence length. In emotionally intoned sentences, higher acoustic pitch was associated with increased typing pressure.

Conclusions: The findings suggest that inner speech may preserve prosodic features of spoken language and that these features can covary with motor output during typing. The results are consistent with an embodied/grounded account in which covert speech engages sensorimotor systems, but the present paradigm does not isolate a causal role for inner speech. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2026 APA, all rights reserved).

内在言语节拍的打字:言语韵律在击键节奏模式中的体现。
目的:本研究通过考察口语句子的韵律特征(特别是节奏和音高)是否影响打字时的运动行为,来考察内在言语是否反映了一种具身表征。方法:在两个实验中,参与者听了结构和情绪语调不同的句子,默默地重复这些句子,然后打字。从口语句子中提取声音特征(节奏和音高)。在打字过程中,电机测量,包括打字速度和按键压力,被记录下来。结果:口语单词持续时间对平均键间间隔有显著预测作用(实验1:β = 113.183, p < .001;实验2:β = 95.857, p < .001)。在实践中,这相当于每增加0.1秒口语持续时间,平均按键间隔增加约11毫秒(实验1)或10毫秒(实验2)。在情绪操纵中,音调预测打字压力(β = 0.586, p < 0.001)。总体而言,更快的节奏与更短的口语相关,压力与韵律突出的协同变化弱,与听觉材料一致。这些趋同的发现与隐蔽语音模拟可以保留韵律细节的观点是一致的,并且这种细节可以在打字动态中表达;然而,目前的设计是相关的,并没有建立因果关系。在这两个实验中,打字速度是由语音速度和句子长度共同预测的。在有情绪语调的句子中,较高的音高与打字压力的增加有关。结论:研究结果表明,内部言语可能保留了口语的韵律特征,这些特征可以随打字时的运动输出而变化。结果与隐含言语涉及感觉运动系统的具体/基础解释一致,但目前的范式并没有孤立内在言语的因果作用。(PsycInfo数据库记录(c) 2026 APA,版权所有)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Neuropsychology
Neuropsychology 医学-神经科学
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
4.20%
发文量
132
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Neuropsychology publishes original, empirical research; systematic reviews and meta-analyses; and theoretical articles on the relation between brain and human cognitive, emotional, and behavioral function.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书