Integrating molecular and conventional diagnostics in native vertebral osteomyelitis: a narrative review.

IF 2.7 Q3 INFECTIOUS DISEASES
Journal of Bone and Joint Infection Pub Date : 2026-06-29 eCollection Date: 2026-01-01 DOI:10.5194/jbji-11-373-2026
Farzad Pourghazi, Omar Mahmoud, Francesco Petri, Said El Zein, Gina A Suh, Takahiro Matsuo, Andrea Gori, Audrey N Schuetz, Elie F Berbari
{"title":"Integrating molecular and conventional diagnostics in native vertebral osteomyelitis: a narrative review.","authors":"Farzad Pourghazi, Omar Mahmoud, Francesco Petri, Said El Zein, Gina A Suh, Takahiro Matsuo, Andrea Gori, Audrey N Schuetz, Elie F Berbari","doi":"10.5194/jbji-11-373-2026","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Native vertebral osteomyelitis (NVO) remains a diagnostic challenge due to its non-specific presentation and the limited sensitivity of culture-based methods. Blood cultures and image-guided biopsies are considered the diagnostic standards, but their yield is often low, especially in patients who have received prior antibiotics or are infected with fastidious microorganisms. Recent molecular techniques, including polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and next-generation sequencing (NGS), have improved pathogen detection and enabled more targeted antimicrobial therapy. In this narrative review, we summarize the diagnostic methods used in NVO, including conventional microbiological and molecular approaches, and present their strengths and limitations based on previous studies. We particularly focus on situations where molecular diagnostic techniques, such as 16S rRNA PCR, NGS, and microbial cell-free DNA testing, outperform traditional culture-based methods in sensitivity, while their specificity may be comparatively lower. Combining these molecular tools with standard diagnostic procedures may improve pathogen detection, guide targeted treatment, and enhance diagnostic accuracy in culture-negative or antibiotic-pretreated cases. Understanding the advantages and limitations of each diagnostic method can help clinicians to choose the most appropriate testing strategy, reduce diagnostic delays, and improve patient management in suspected NVO.</p>","PeriodicalId":15271,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Bone and Joint Infection","volume":"11 3","pages":"373-385"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13336145/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Bone and Joint Infection","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5194/jbji-11-373-2026","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Native vertebral osteomyelitis (NVO) remains a diagnostic challenge due to its non-specific presentation and the limited sensitivity of culture-based methods. Blood cultures and image-guided biopsies are considered the diagnostic standards, but their yield is often low, especially in patients who have received prior antibiotics or are infected with fastidious microorganisms. Recent molecular techniques, including polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and next-generation sequencing (NGS), have improved pathogen detection and enabled more targeted antimicrobial therapy. In this narrative review, we summarize the diagnostic methods used in NVO, including conventional microbiological and molecular approaches, and present their strengths and limitations based on previous studies. We particularly focus on situations where molecular diagnostic techniques, such as 16S rRNA PCR, NGS, and microbial cell-free DNA testing, outperform traditional culture-based methods in sensitivity, while their specificity may be comparatively lower. Combining these molecular tools with standard diagnostic procedures may improve pathogen detection, guide targeted treatment, and enhance diagnostic accuracy in culture-negative or antibiotic-pretreated cases. Understanding the advantages and limitations of each diagnostic method can help clinicians to choose the most appropriate testing strategy, reduce diagnostic delays, and improve patient management in suspected NVO.

整合分子和传统诊断在原生椎体骨髓炎:叙述回顾。
原生椎体骨髓炎(NVO)仍然是一个诊断挑战,由于其非特异性的表现和有限的敏感性培养为基础的方法。血液培养和图像引导活检被认为是诊断标准,但它们的产量往往很低,特别是在先前接受过抗生素或感染过挑剔微生物的患者中。最近的分子技术,包括聚合酶链反应(PCR)和下一代测序(NGS),已经改善了病原体检测和实现更有针对性的抗菌治疗。在这篇叙述性的综述中,我们总结了用于NVO的诊断方法,包括传统的微生物和分子方法,并根据以往的研究介绍了它们的优势和局限性。我们特别关注分子诊断技术的情况,如16S rRNA PCR、NGS和微生物无细胞DNA检测,在灵敏度上优于传统的基于培养的方法,但它们的特异性可能相对较低。将这些分子工具与标准诊断程序相结合,可以改善病原体检测,指导有针对性的治疗,并提高培养阴性或抗生素预处理病例的诊断准确性。了解每种诊断方法的优点和局限性可以帮助临床医生选择最合适的检测策略,减少诊断延误,并改善疑似NVO的患者管理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
29
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书