Economic claims following chronic pain after inguinal hernia repair.

IF 2.7 2区 医学 Q1 SURGERY
Hernia Pub Date : 2026-07-14 DOI:10.1007/s10029-026-03796-3
Kenney Fehrenkamp Pedersen, Martin Frimand Rønnow, Thue Bisgaard
{"title":"Economic claims following chronic pain after inguinal hernia repair.","authors":"Kenney Fehrenkamp Pedersen, Martin Frimand Rønnow, Thue Bisgaard","doi":"10.1007/s10029-026-03796-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Economic claims after surgery may be regarded as an alternative surrogate outcome for long-term deprived quality of life. This study reports economic claims of chronic pain following inguinal hernia repair.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Consecutive data on economic claims following inguinal hernia repair was collected from the nationwide Danish Patient Compensation Association. Patients' claims were stratified into three groups: 1) isolated chronic pain claims without claims of competing potential reasons for chronic pain (ICP); 2) diverse claims not involving claims of chronic pain (NCP); and 3) claims involving a combination of chronic pain and competing potential claim reasons for chronic pain (CCP).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 507 patients were included and 256 (50.5%) filed a claim involving chronic pain. Follow-up was 100% and median time from hernia repair to patient filing a claim in the ICP group was 1.5 years (IQR 0.6-2.6 years). ICP, NCP and CCP comprised 172 patients (33.9%), 251 patients (49.5%) and 84 patients (16.6%) respectively. Chronic pain was by far the most common claim reason (33.6% of all claim reasons). The median sum of granted compensation per patient in the ICP, NCP and CCP groups was €14,440 (IQR 7,233-100,600), €6,289 (4,024-12,094) and €7,777 (5,639-11,781) respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Long-term chronic pain alone, not involving other complications, was by far the most common reason for seeking economic compensation. Economic compensation of isolated chronic pain (ICP) was rare, but when awarded, was substantially higher than compensation for other claims.</p>","PeriodicalId":13168,"journal":{"name":"Hernia","volume":"30 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13368902/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hernia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-026-03796-3","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Economic claims after surgery may be regarded as an alternative surrogate outcome for long-term deprived quality of life. This study reports economic claims of chronic pain following inguinal hernia repair.

Methods: Consecutive data on economic claims following inguinal hernia repair was collected from the nationwide Danish Patient Compensation Association. Patients' claims were stratified into three groups: 1) isolated chronic pain claims without claims of competing potential reasons for chronic pain (ICP); 2) diverse claims not involving claims of chronic pain (NCP); and 3) claims involving a combination of chronic pain and competing potential claim reasons for chronic pain (CCP).

Results: A total of 507 patients were included and 256 (50.5%) filed a claim involving chronic pain. Follow-up was 100% and median time from hernia repair to patient filing a claim in the ICP group was 1.5 years (IQR 0.6-2.6 years). ICP, NCP and CCP comprised 172 patients (33.9%), 251 patients (49.5%) and 84 patients (16.6%) respectively. Chronic pain was by far the most common claim reason (33.6% of all claim reasons). The median sum of granted compensation per patient in the ICP, NCP and CCP groups was €14,440 (IQR 7,233-100,600), €6,289 (4,024-12,094) and €7,777 (5,639-11,781) respectively.

Conclusion: Long-term chronic pain alone, not involving other complications, was by far the most common reason for seeking economic compensation. Economic compensation of isolated chronic pain (ICP) was rare, but when awarded, was substantially higher than compensation for other claims.

腹股沟疝修补术后慢性疼痛的经济索赔。
目的:手术后的经济索赔可被视为长期生活质量剥夺的替代结果。本研究报告了腹股沟疝修补后慢性疼痛的经济索赔。方法:从全国范围内的丹麦患者赔偿协会收集腹股沟疝修补术后经济索赔的连续数据。患者的索赔被分为三组:1)孤立的慢性疼痛索赔,没有竞争性慢性疼痛的潜在原因索赔(ICP);2)不涉及慢性疼痛(NCP)的不同索赔;3)涉及慢性疼痛和慢性疼痛的竞争潜在索赔原因(CCP)的索赔。结果:共纳入507例患者,其中256例(50.5%)提出了涉及慢性疼痛的索赔。随访率为100%,从疝修补到患者提出索赔的中位时间为1.5年(IQR为0.6-2.6年)。ICP 172例(33.9%),NCP 251例(49.5%),CCP 84例(16.6%)。慢性疼痛是迄今为止最常见的索赔原因(占所有索赔原因的33.6%)。ICP组、NCP组和CCP组每名患者获得补偿的中位数分别为14,440欧元(IQR 7,233-100,600)、6,289欧元(4,024-12,094)和7,777欧元(5,639-11,781)。结论:长期慢性疼痛是目前寻求经济赔偿最常见的原因,不涉及其他并发症。孤立性慢性疼痛(ICP)的经济补偿是罕见的,但当授予,大大高于赔偿其他索赔。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Hernia
Hernia SURGERY-
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
26.10%
发文量
171
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Hernia was founded in 1997 by Jean P. Chevrel with the purpose of promoting clinical studies and basic research as they apply to groin hernias and the abdominal wall . Since that time, a true revolution in the field of hernia studies has transformed the field from a ”simple” disease to one that is very specialized. While the majority of surgeries for primary inguinal and abdominal wall hernia are performed in hospitals worldwide, complex situations such as multi recurrences, complications, abdominal wall reconstructions and others are being studied and treated in specialist centers. As a result, major institutions and societies are creating specific parameters and criteria to better address the complexities of hernia surgery. Hernia is a journal written by surgeons who have made abdominal wall surgery their specific field of interest, but we will consider publishing content from any surgeon who wishes to improve the science of this field. The Journal aims to ensure that hernia surgery is safer and easier for surgeons as well as patients, and provides a forum to all surgeons in the exchange of new ideas, results, and important research that is the basis of professional activity.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书