Influence of internal ring defect closure on postoperative seroma formation after laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal repair for large indirect inguinal hernia: A randomized controlled study.
Mao Xiong, Wei-Hang Liu, Qi-Di Zhu, Bin Zhao, Li Zhu, Zhui Long
{"title":"Influence of internal ring defect closure on postoperative seroma formation after laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal repair for large indirect inguinal hernia: A randomized controlled study.","authors":"Mao Xiong, Wei-Hang Liu, Qi-Di Zhu, Bin Zhao, Li Zhu, Zhui Long","doi":"10.1007/s10029-026-03785-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To evaluate the effect of internal ring defect closure on seroma prevention after laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal inguinal hernia repair (TAPP).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a randomized controlled trial including male patients aged 18-75 years with indirect inguinal hernia classified as L3 (defect ≥ 3 cm). Participants were randomly assigned to undergo TAPP with internal ring closure (DC group) or none closure (NC group). Primary outcomes were operative time and postoperative seroma incidence, assessed by clinical examination and ultrasonography at 7 days, 1 month, and 3 months. Secondary outcomes included postoperative pain, recurrence, hospital stay, and complications.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 76 patients were randomized (DC, n = 38; NC, n = 38). Baseline characteristics were comparable between groups. During the 90-day follow-up period, postoperative seroma occurred in 3 patients in the DC group and 10 patients in the NC group. Kaplan-Meier analysis demonstrated a significantly higher seroma-free survival rate in the DC group than in the NC group (log-rank P = 0.0335). No significant differences were observed in operative time, postoperative pain, length of hospital stay, recurrence, or other postoperative complications.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Internal ring defect closure during TAPP repair significantly improves seroma-free survival and reduces the incidence of early postoperative seroma without increasing operative risk, postoperative pain, or morbidity.Although recurrence was not observed, the relatively small sample size and limited follow-up warrant cautious interpretation. Larger multicenter studies with extended surveillance are needed to validate these findings and define the role of internal ring closure in optimizing outcomes after laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair.</p>","PeriodicalId":13168,"journal":{"name":"Hernia","volume":"30 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hernia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-026-03785-6","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose: To evaluate the effect of internal ring defect closure on seroma prevention after laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal inguinal hernia repair (TAPP).
Methods: We conducted a randomized controlled trial including male patients aged 18-75 years with indirect inguinal hernia classified as L3 (defect ≥ 3 cm). Participants were randomly assigned to undergo TAPP with internal ring closure (DC group) or none closure (NC group). Primary outcomes were operative time and postoperative seroma incidence, assessed by clinical examination and ultrasonography at 7 days, 1 month, and 3 months. Secondary outcomes included postoperative pain, recurrence, hospital stay, and complications.
Results: A total of 76 patients were randomized (DC, n = 38; NC, n = 38). Baseline characteristics were comparable between groups. During the 90-day follow-up period, postoperative seroma occurred in 3 patients in the DC group and 10 patients in the NC group. Kaplan-Meier analysis demonstrated a significantly higher seroma-free survival rate in the DC group than in the NC group (log-rank P = 0.0335). No significant differences were observed in operative time, postoperative pain, length of hospital stay, recurrence, or other postoperative complications.
Conclusions: Internal ring defect closure during TAPP repair significantly improves seroma-free survival and reduces the incidence of early postoperative seroma without increasing operative risk, postoperative pain, or morbidity.Although recurrence was not observed, the relatively small sample size and limited follow-up warrant cautious interpretation. Larger multicenter studies with extended surveillance are needed to validate these findings and define the role of internal ring closure in optimizing outcomes after laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair.
目的:探讨腹腔镜经腹膜前腹股沟疝修补术(TAPP)后内环缺损闭合对预防血肿的作用。方法:我们进行了一项随机对照试验,纳入了年龄18-75岁的男性腹股沟间接疝患者,分类为L3(缺损≥3cm)。参与者被随机分配进行TAPP内环闭合(DC组)或不闭合(NC组)。主要结局是手术时间和术后血肿发生率,分别在第7天、第1个月和第3个月通过临床检查和超声检查评估。次要结局包括术后疼痛、复发、住院时间和并发症。结果:共76例患者被随机化(DC, n = 38; NC, n = 38)。各组间基线特征具有可比性。在90天的随访中,DC组3例出现术后血清肿,NC组10例出现术后血清肿。Kaplan-Meier分析显示,DC组无血清生存率显著高于NC组(log-rank P = 0.0335)。在手术时间、术后疼痛、住院时间、复发或其他术后并发症方面没有观察到显著差异。结论:TAPP修复术中闭合内环缺损可显著提高无血肿生存率,降低术后早期血肿发生率,且不增加手术风险、术后疼痛或发病率。虽然没有观察到复发,但相对较小的样本量和有限的随访值得谨慎解释。需要更大规模的多中心研究和更广泛的监测来验证这些发现,并确定内环关闭在腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术后优化结果中的作用。
期刊介绍:
Hernia was founded in 1997 by Jean P. Chevrel with the purpose of promoting clinical studies and basic research as they apply to groin hernias and the abdominal wall . Since that time, a true revolution in the field of hernia studies has transformed the field from a ”simple” disease to one that is very specialized. While the majority of surgeries for primary inguinal and abdominal wall hernia are performed in hospitals worldwide, complex situations such as multi recurrences, complications, abdominal wall reconstructions and others are being studied and treated in specialist centers. As a result, major institutions and societies are creating specific parameters and criteria to better address the complexities of hernia surgery.
Hernia is a journal written by surgeons who have made abdominal wall surgery their specific field of interest, but we will consider publishing content from any surgeon who wishes to improve the science of this field. The Journal aims to ensure that hernia surgery is safer and easier for surgeons as well as patients, and provides a forum to all surgeons in the exchange of new ideas, results, and important research that is the basis of professional activity.