Bending Oxygen Saturation Index and Risk of Major Cardiac Adverse Events in Patients with Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension.

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Cardiology Pub Date : 2026-07-13 DOI:10.1159/000553478
Dursun Akaslan, Emre Aslanger, Burcu Aggül, Mehmet Narli, Elif Yaren Yurtman, Halil Ataş, Bülent Mutlu
{"title":"Bending Oxygen Saturation Index and Risk of Major Cardiac Adverse Events in Patients with Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension.","authors":"Dursun Akaslan, Emre Aslanger, Burcu Aggül, Mehmet Narli, Elif Yaren Yurtman, Halil Ataş, Bülent Mutlu","doi":"10.1159/000553478","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Shortness of breath while bending and its more objective version, bending oxygen saturation index (BOSI), are the latest additions to pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) symptom and signs armamentarium. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the association between BOSI and clinical outcomes in patients with PAH and to explore its potential to complement current risk estimation schemes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this single-center, prospective, observational study, we enrolled patients with PAH who are under stable treatment. Baseline mortality risk was estimated using established risk schemes. Primary endpoint was defined as the combination of all-cause hospitalization and all-cause mortality at 1 year. The discriminative performance of BOSI was evaluated using ROC curve analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 102 patients were enrolled into the study. BOSI was equal to or more than 3 in 33 patients (32.4%). Primary endpoint occurred in 20 (60.6%) in BOSI ≥3 group and 16 (23.2%) in BOSI <3 group (p < 0.001). ROC analysis showed that BOSI had a significant discriminative ability (AUC 0.687, p = 0.002). Cox regression analysis showed that a BOSI ≥3 was significantly associated with adverse events, even after adjustment for baseline risk estimated by the four most used risk schemes (REVEAL, REVEAL Lite, COMPERA, and European Society of Cardiology/European Respiratory Society risk scores).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>BOSI is independently associated with adverse events in patients with PAH and its addition to current risk scores may improve baseline risk estimation.</p>","PeriodicalId":9391,"journal":{"name":"Cardiology","volume":" ","pages":"1-11"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cardiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000553478","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Shortness of breath while bending and its more objective version, bending oxygen saturation index (BOSI), are the latest additions to pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) symptom and signs armamentarium. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the association between BOSI and clinical outcomes in patients with PAH and to explore its potential to complement current risk estimation schemes.

Methods: In this single-center, prospective, observational study, we enrolled patients with PAH who are under stable treatment. Baseline mortality risk was estimated using established risk schemes. Primary endpoint was defined as the combination of all-cause hospitalization and all-cause mortality at 1 year. The discriminative performance of BOSI was evaluated using ROC curve analysis.

Results: A total of 102 patients were enrolled into the study. BOSI was equal to or more than 3 in 33 patients (32.4%). Primary endpoint occurred in 20 (60.6%) in BOSI ≥3 group and 16 (23.2%) in BOSI <3 group (p < 0.001). ROC analysis showed that BOSI had a significant discriminative ability (AUC 0.687, p = 0.002). Cox regression analysis showed that a BOSI ≥3 was significantly associated with adverse events, even after adjustment for baseline risk estimated by the four most used risk schemes (REVEAL, REVEAL Lite, COMPERA, and European Society of Cardiology/European Respiratory Society risk scores).

Conclusion: BOSI is independently associated with adverse events in patients with PAH and its addition to current risk scores may improve baseline risk estimation.

肺动脉高压患者弯曲氧饱和度指数与主要心脏不良事件的风险。
简介:弯曲时的呼吸短促及其更客观的版本,弯曲氧饱和度指数(BOSI),是最新增加的肺动脉高压(PAH)症状和体征。在这项研究中,我们旨在评估BOSI与PAH患者临床结果之间的关系,并探讨其补充当前风险评估方案的潜力。方法:在这项单中心、前瞻性、观察性研究中,我们招募了治疗稳定的PAH患者。使用既定的风险方案估计基线死亡风险。主要终点定义为一年内全因住院和全因死亡率的总和。采用ROC曲线分析评价BOSI的判别性能。结果:共有102例患者入组。BOSI≥3者33例(32.4%)。BOSI≥3组有20人(60.6%)出现主要终点,BOSI组有16人(23.2%)出现主要终点。结论:BOSI与PAH患者的不良事件独立相关,将其添加到当前风险评分中可能改善基线风险估计。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Cardiology
Cardiology 医学-心血管系统
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
5.30%
发文量
56
审稿时长
1.5 months
期刊介绍: ''Cardiology'' features first reports on original clinical, preclinical and fundamental research as well as ''Novel Insights from Clinical Experience'' and topical comprehensive reviews in selected areas of cardiovascular disease. ''Editorial Comments'' provide a critical but positive evaluation of a recent article. Papers not only describe but offer critical appraisals of new developments in non-invasive and invasive diagnostic methods and in pharmacologic, nutritional and mechanical/surgical therapies. Readers are thus kept informed of current strategies in the prevention, recognition and treatment of heart disease. Special sections in a variety of subspecialty areas reinforce the journal''s value as a complete record of recent progress for all cardiologists, internists, cardiac surgeons, clinical physiologists, pharmacologists and professionals in other areas of medicine interested in current activity in cardiovascular diseases.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书