Risk factors for antibiotic treatment failure in tubo-ovarian abscess: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

IF 3.3 3区 医学 Q2 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Minmin Zhao, Rong Chen, Liting Fan, Haiyan Zhang
{"title":"Risk factors for antibiotic treatment failure in tubo-ovarian abscess: a systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Minmin Zhao, Rong Chen, Liting Fan, Haiyan Zhang","doi":"10.1186/s12905-026-04534-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Tubo-ovarian abscess (TOA) is a severe complication of pelvic inflammatory disease (PID). Conservative antibiotic therapy is the preferred first-line treatment; however, treatment failure necessitates surgical intervention in a subset of patients. This study aimed to identify risk factors associated with antibiotic treatment failure in TOA through a systematic review and meta-analysis, thereby providing evidence for clinical decision-making.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic search was conducted in PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library and Web of Science to identify controlled studies on risk factors for antibiotic treatment failure in TOA published between database inception and December 2025. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale was used to assess the quality of the literature. Mean differences (MDs) or odds ratios with 95% confidence intervals were calculated. Heterogeneity was assessed using the I<sup>2</sup> statistic and the Q test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirteen studies involving 1,759 patients were included. The meta-analysis revealed that patients in the antibiotic treatment failure group were significantly older (MD = 3.61 years, P < 0.0001) and had significantly larger abscess diameters (MD = 18.43 mm, P < 0.0001) than those in the success group. Furthermore, higher gravidity (MD = 0.59, P = 0.0001) and parity (MD = 0.32, P = 0.002) were identified as significant risk factors for treatment failure. No statistically significant associations were found between treatment failure and history of smoking, history of PID, intrauterine device use, palpable pelvic mass or positive pathogen culture.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Advanced age, larger abscess diameter and multiparity are potential risk factors for antibiotic treatment failure in TOA. For such high-risk patients, more aggressive monitoring or early combined minimally invasive drainage strategies are recommended.</p>","PeriodicalId":9204,"journal":{"name":"BMC Women's Health","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13644163/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Women's Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12905-026-04534-8","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Tubo-ovarian abscess (TOA) is a severe complication of pelvic inflammatory disease (PID). Conservative antibiotic therapy is the preferred first-line treatment; however, treatment failure necessitates surgical intervention in a subset of patients. This study aimed to identify risk factors associated with antibiotic treatment failure in TOA through a systematic review and meta-analysis, thereby providing evidence for clinical decision-making.

Methods: A systematic search was conducted in PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library and Web of Science to identify controlled studies on risk factors for antibiotic treatment failure in TOA published between database inception and December 2025. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale was used to assess the quality of the literature. Mean differences (MDs) or odds ratios with 95% confidence intervals were calculated. Heterogeneity was assessed using the I2 statistic and the Q test.

Results: Thirteen studies involving 1,759 patients were included. The meta-analysis revealed that patients in the antibiotic treatment failure group were significantly older (MD = 3.61 years, P < 0.0001) and had significantly larger abscess diameters (MD = 18.43 mm, P < 0.0001) than those in the success group. Furthermore, higher gravidity (MD = 0.59, P = 0.0001) and parity (MD = 0.32, P = 0.002) were identified as significant risk factors for treatment failure. No statistically significant associations were found between treatment failure and history of smoking, history of PID, intrauterine device use, palpable pelvic mass or positive pathogen culture.

Conclusion: Advanced age, larger abscess diameter and multiparity are potential risk factors for antibiotic treatment failure in TOA. For such high-risk patients, more aggressive monitoring or early combined minimally invasive drainage strategies are recommended.

输卵管卵巢脓肿抗生素治疗失败的危险因素:系统回顾和荟萃分析。
背景:输卵管卵巢脓肿(TOA)是盆腔炎(PID)的严重并发症。保守性抗生素治疗是首选的一线治疗;然而,治疗失败需要手术干预的一部分患者。本研究旨在通过系统回顾和荟萃分析,确定TOA中抗生素治疗失败的相关危险因素,从而为临床决策提供依据。方法:系统检索PubMed、Embase、Cochrane Library和Web of Science,确定数据库建立至2025年12月期间发表的TOA中抗生素治疗失败危险因素的对照研究。纽卡斯尔-渥太华量表用于评估文献的质量。计算95%置信区间的平均差异(MDs)或比值比。采用I2统计量和Q检验评估异质性。结果:纳入13项研究,共1759例患者。meta分析显示,抗生素治疗失败组患者明显高龄(MD = 3.61岁),P结论:高龄、脓肿直径较大、多胎是TOA抗生素治疗失败的潜在危险因素。对于此类高危患者,建议更积极的监测或早期联合微创引流策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Women's Health
BMC Women's Health OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY-
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
4.00%
发文量
444
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Women''s Health is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of the health and wellbeing of adolescent girls and women, with a particular focus on the physical, mental, and emotional health of women in developed and developing nations. The journal welcomes submissions on women''s public health issues, health behaviours, breast cancer, gynecological diseases, mental health and health promotion.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书