Letter to the Editor: The Association Between Glycemic Variability and the Risk of Diabetic Retinopathy Progression: A Community-Based Retrospective Cohort Study

IF 5.9 2区 医学 Q2 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM
Wenli Xu, Yingyan Ma, Qinping Yang, Qinghua Yan, Jingyan Tian, Yan Shi, Minna Cheng, Lina Lu
{"title":"Letter to the Editor: The Association Between Glycemic Variability and the Risk of Diabetic Retinopathy Progression: A Community-Based Retrospective Cohort Study","authors":"Wenli Xu,&nbsp;Yingyan Ma,&nbsp;Qinping Yang,&nbsp;Qinghua Yan,&nbsp;Jingyan Tian,&nbsp;Yan Shi,&nbsp;Minna Cheng,&nbsp;Lina Lu","doi":"10.1111/1753-0407.70250","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Diabetic retinopathy is among the most clinically significant microvascular complications of diabetes and is a leading cause of preventable blindness [<span>1</span>]. Average glycemic control is an established risk factor [<span>2, 3</span>], but whether glycemic variability contributes independently to retinal damage remains less clear [<span>4, 5</span>]. We examined whether long-term variability in HbA1c, derived from serial measurements, was associated with diabetic retinopathy progression in a community-based cohort of patients with type 2 diabetes.</p><p>We included 675 adults with type 2 diabetes who underwent fundus examinations in both 2020 and 2023, and who had at least three valid HbA1c measurements during follow-up. Five variability indices were calculated: coefficient of variation, average real variability, successive variation, variability independent of the mean, and HbA1c variability score. Progression was defined as incident retinopathy, progression to proliferative disease, or worsening within non-proliferative stages.</p><p>Of 675 participants, 125 experienced diabetic retinopathy progression. All variability indices were numerically higher in the progression group, but only HbA1c variability score differed significantly at baseline. After multivariable adjustment, HbA1c variability score remained independently associated with progression; the other indices did not. In stratified analysis, the association was stronger in patients with diabetes duration of 10 years or less but was not significant in those with longer diseases.</p><p>These findings suggest that the frequency of clinically meaningful HbA1c fluctuations may matter more than how large individual swings are. The attenuation of the association with longer diabetes duration may reflect the accumulating burden of structural retinal damage, which by then has likely been shaped by years of prior exposure. If replicated, this would argue that the first decade after diagnosis is a particularly important window for glycemic stabilization—not just lowering means HbA1c but reducing repeated excursions.</p><p>Practically, HbA1c variability score can be derived from routine clinical measurements, making it a feasible marker for risk stratification without additional testing. Prospective trials are needed to determine whether reducing glycemic instability translates into slower retinopathy progression.</p><p>In summary, long-term HbA1c variability, specifically HbA1c variability score, was independently associated with diabetic retinopathy progression in type 2 diabetes. Glycemic stability, not just glycemic level, may deserve more attention in routine care—particularly early in the disease course.</p><p><b>Wenli Xu:</b> conceptualization, methodology, investigation, software, formal analysis, writing – original draft, visualization. <b>Yingyan Ma:</b> conceptualization, investigation, data curation, writing – review and editing. <b>Qinping Yang:</b> conceptualization, methodology, investigation, data curation, writing – review and editing. <b>Qinghua Yan:</b> investigation, resources. <b>Jingyan Tian:</b> conceptualization, methodology, supervision, writing – review and editing. <b>Yan Shi:</b> resources. <b>Minna Cheng:</b> supervision, funding acquisition. <b>Lina Lu:</b> project administration, supervision.</p><p>This work was supported by the following: Noncommunicable Chronic Diseases-National Science and Technology Major Project of China (Grant Nos. 2024ZD0543500 and 2024ZD0524200); Shanghai Municipal Public Health Research Special Project (Grant No. 2024GKM05); Shanghai Municipal Health Commission—Health Industry Youth Project of Clinical Research (Grant No. 20244Y0136); National Natural Science Foundation of China (82370902).</p><p>The authors declare no conflicts of interest.</p><p>Research data contain personally identifiable information and are not shared.</p>","PeriodicalId":189,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Diabetes","volume":"18 7","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/1753-0407.70250","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Diabetes","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1753-0407.70250","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Diabetic retinopathy is among the most clinically significant microvascular complications of diabetes and is a leading cause of preventable blindness [1]. Average glycemic control is an established risk factor [2, 3], but whether glycemic variability contributes independently to retinal damage remains less clear [4, 5]. We examined whether long-term variability in HbA1c, derived from serial measurements, was associated with diabetic retinopathy progression in a community-based cohort of patients with type 2 diabetes.

We included 675 adults with type 2 diabetes who underwent fundus examinations in both 2020 and 2023, and who had at least three valid HbA1c measurements during follow-up. Five variability indices were calculated: coefficient of variation, average real variability, successive variation, variability independent of the mean, and HbA1c variability score. Progression was defined as incident retinopathy, progression to proliferative disease, or worsening within non-proliferative stages.

Of 675 participants, 125 experienced diabetic retinopathy progression. All variability indices were numerically higher in the progression group, but only HbA1c variability score differed significantly at baseline. After multivariable adjustment, HbA1c variability score remained independently associated with progression; the other indices did not. In stratified analysis, the association was stronger in patients with diabetes duration of 10 years or less but was not significant in those with longer diseases.

These findings suggest that the frequency of clinically meaningful HbA1c fluctuations may matter more than how large individual swings are. The attenuation of the association with longer diabetes duration may reflect the accumulating burden of structural retinal damage, which by then has likely been shaped by years of prior exposure. If replicated, this would argue that the first decade after diagnosis is a particularly important window for glycemic stabilization—not just lowering means HbA1c but reducing repeated excursions.

Practically, HbA1c variability score can be derived from routine clinical measurements, making it a feasible marker for risk stratification without additional testing. Prospective trials are needed to determine whether reducing glycemic instability translates into slower retinopathy progression.

In summary, long-term HbA1c variability, specifically HbA1c variability score, was independently associated with diabetic retinopathy progression in type 2 diabetes. Glycemic stability, not just glycemic level, may deserve more attention in routine care—particularly early in the disease course.

Wenli Xu: conceptualization, methodology, investigation, software, formal analysis, writing – original draft, visualization. Yingyan Ma: conceptualization, investigation, data curation, writing – review and editing. Qinping Yang: conceptualization, methodology, investigation, data curation, writing – review and editing. Qinghua Yan: investigation, resources. Jingyan Tian: conceptualization, methodology, supervision, writing – review and editing. Yan Shi: resources. Minna Cheng: supervision, funding acquisition. Lina Lu: project administration, supervision.

This work was supported by the following: Noncommunicable Chronic Diseases-National Science and Technology Major Project of China (Grant Nos. 2024ZD0543500 and 2024ZD0524200); Shanghai Municipal Public Health Research Special Project (Grant No. 2024GKM05); Shanghai Municipal Health Commission—Health Industry Youth Project of Clinical Research (Grant No. 20244Y0136); National Natural Science Foundation of China (82370902).

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Research data contain personally identifiable information and are not shared.

致编辑的信:血糖变异性与糖尿病视网膜病变进展风险之间的关系:一项基于社区的回顾性队列研究。
糖尿病视网膜病变是糖尿病最重要的临床微血管并发症之一,也是导致可预防失明的主要原因。平均血糖控制是一个确定的危险因素[2,3],但血糖变异性是否独立导致视网膜损伤尚不清楚[4,5]。我们研究了基于社区的2型糖尿病患者队列中HbA1c的长期变异性是否与糖尿病视网膜病变进展相关。我们纳入了675名成人2型糖尿病患者,他们在2020年和2023年接受了眼底检查,并且在随访期间至少有三个有效的HbA1c测量值。计算五个变异性指标:变异系数、平均真实变异性、连续变异性、独立于平均值的变异性和HbA1c变异性评分。进展被定义为偶发性视网膜病变,进展为增殖性疾病,或在非增殖性阶段恶化。在675名参与者中,125人经历了糖尿病视网膜病变的进展。进展组的所有变异性指数数值都较高,但只有HbA1c变异性评分在基线时存在显著差异。多变量调整后,HbA1c变异性评分仍与进展独立相关;其他指数则不然。在分层分析中,这种关联在糖尿病病程10年或更短的患者中更强,但在病程较长的患者中不显著。这些发现表明,临床意义上的HbA1c波动频率可能比个体波动幅度更重要。与糖尿病持续时间较长的相关性的减弱可能反映了结构性视网膜损伤的累积负担,这可能是由于多年的先前暴露而形成的。如果重复,这将证明诊断后的第一个十年是血糖稳定的一个特别重要的窗口期——不仅降低意味着HbA1c,而且减少重复的漂移。实际上,HbA1c变异性评分可以从常规临床测量中得出,使其成为一种可行的风险分层指标,而无需额外的检测。需要前瞻性试验来确定降低血糖不稳定性是否转化为减缓视网膜病变进展。总之,长期HbA1c变异性,特别是HbA1c变异性评分,与2型糖尿病的糖尿病视网膜病变进展独立相关。血糖稳定,而不仅仅是血糖水平,应该在常规护理中得到更多的关注,尤其是在病程早期。徐文丽:概念化、方法论、调查、软件、形式分析、撰写原稿、可视化。马英艳:概念化,调查,数据整理,写作-审查和编辑。杨勤平:概念、方法、调查、数据整理、写作-审查和编辑。清华颜:调查,资源。田景燕:概念、方法、监督、写作、审稿、编辑。严实:资源。程敏娜:监管,资金获取。吕丽娜:项目管理、监理。非传染性慢性病国家科技重大专项(项目编号:2024ZD0543500、2024ZD0524200);上海市公共卫生科研专项(批准号2024GKM05);上海市卫健委健康产业青年临床研究项目(批准号20244Y0136);国家自然科学基金项目(82370902);作者声明无利益冲突。研究数据包含个人身份信息,不共享。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Diabetes
Journal of Diabetes ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM-
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
2.20%
发文量
94
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Diabetes (JDB) devotes itself to diabetes research, therapeutics, and education. It aims to involve researchers and practitioners in a dialogue between East and West via all aspects of epidemiology, etiology, pathogenesis, management, complications and prevention of diabetes, including the molecular, biochemical, and physiological aspects of diabetes. The Editorial team is international with a unique mix of Asian and Western participation. The Editors welcome submissions in form of original research articles, images, novel case reports and correspondence, and will solicit reviews, point-counterpoint, commentaries, editorials, news highlights, and educational content.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书