Sustainable Alkali Activators for Geopolymer Concrete: A Systematic Review of Macro- and Microstructural Properties

IF 4.1 3区 材料科学 Q3 CHEMISTRY, PHYSICAL
Silicon Pub Date : 2026-05-27 DOI:10.1007/s12633-026-03703-6
Mohana Rajendran, Chithambar Ganesh A
{"title":"Sustainable Alkali Activators for Geopolymer Concrete: A Systematic Review of Macro- and Microstructural Properties","authors":"Mohana Rajendran,&nbsp;Chithambar Ganesh A","doi":"10.1007/s12633-026-03703-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Geopolymer concrete (GPC) has gained attention as a sustainable alternative to Portland cement-based concrete due to its reduced carbon emissions and favorable mechanical properties<b>.</b> However, its broader application is limited by the high cost and carbon footprint associated with commercial alkaline activators. To address this, recent studies have explored the use of alternative activators derived from commercial and agro-industrial wastes, aiming to improve the environmental and economic viability of GPC. This review evaluates the performance of GPC incorporating waste-derived activators, with insights from microstructural analyses such as Scanning Electron Microscope(SEM), X-ray diffraction (XRD), Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR), Thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) and Nuclear Magnetic Resonance (NMR) Analysis. These activators demonstrated enhanced dissolution rates and nucleation effects, promoting the formation of reaction products like C-A-S–H, N-A-S–H, and K-A-S–H gels. For instance, dedust and rice husk ash (RHA) reduced initial setting time by 64% and 57%, respectively. Compressive strength increased by 16.4% with dedust and 4% with silica fume (SF), while flexural strength improved by 47% with olive biomass ash (OBA) and 28% with RHA. In terms of durability, paper sludge and wood biomass ash (WBA) reduced water absorption by 22% and 13%, respectively, and SF reduced drying shrinkage by 25% compared to commercial activators. Cost–benefit analysis further confirms the economic feasibility of these alternatives. While the results are promising, further research is needed to fully understand the environmental impacts and long-term performance of waste-derived activators in GPC.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":776,"journal":{"name":"Silicon","volume":"18 8","pages":"2941 - 2967"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Silicon","FirstCategoryId":"88","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12633-026-03703-6","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"材料科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, PHYSICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Geopolymer concrete (GPC) has gained attention as a sustainable alternative to Portland cement-based concrete due to its reduced carbon emissions and favorable mechanical properties. However, its broader application is limited by the high cost and carbon footprint associated with commercial alkaline activators. To address this, recent studies have explored the use of alternative activators derived from commercial and agro-industrial wastes, aiming to improve the environmental and economic viability of GPC. This review evaluates the performance of GPC incorporating waste-derived activators, with insights from microstructural analyses such as Scanning Electron Microscope(SEM), X-ray diffraction (XRD), Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR), Thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) and Nuclear Magnetic Resonance (NMR) Analysis. These activators demonstrated enhanced dissolution rates and nucleation effects, promoting the formation of reaction products like C-A-S–H, N-A-S–H, and K-A-S–H gels. For instance, dedust and rice husk ash (RHA) reduced initial setting time by 64% and 57%, respectively. Compressive strength increased by 16.4% with dedust and 4% with silica fume (SF), while flexural strength improved by 47% with olive biomass ash (OBA) and 28% with RHA. In terms of durability, paper sludge and wood biomass ash (WBA) reduced water absorption by 22% and 13%, respectively, and SF reduced drying shrinkage by 25% compared to commercial activators. Cost–benefit analysis further confirms the economic feasibility of these alternatives. While the results are promising, further research is needed to fully understand the environmental impacts and long-term performance of waste-derived activators in GPC.

地聚合物混凝土的可持续碱活化剂:宏观和微观结构性能的系统综述
地聚合物混凝土(GPC)由于其减少碳排放和良好的机械性能,作为波特兰水泥基混凝土的可持续替代品而受到关注。然而,它的广泛应用受到商业碱性活化剂的高成本和碳足迹的限制。为了解决这个问题,最近的研究已经探索了从商业和农业工业废物中提取的替代活化剂的使用,旨在提高GPC的环境和经济可行性。本文通过扫描电子显微镜(SEM)、x射线衍射(XRD)、傅里叶变换红外光谱(FTIR)、热重分析(TGA)和核磁共振(NMR)等微观结构分析,对含有废物衍生活化剂的GPC的性能进行了评价。这些活化剂表现出更高的溶解速率和成核效应,促进反应产物如C-A-S-H、N-A-S-H和K-A-S-H凝胶的形成。例如,除灰剂和稻壳灰(RHA)分别使初凝时间缩短了64%和57%。除灰和硅灰(SF)的抗压强度分别提高了16.4%和4%,而橄榄生物质灰(OBA)和RHA的抗折强度分别提高了47%和28%。就耐久性而言,与商业活化剂相比,纸污泥和木材生物质灰(WBA)分别减少了22%和13%的吸水性,SF减少了25%的干燥收缩率。成本效益分析进一步证实了这些替代方案的经济可行性。虽然结果是有希望的,但需要进一步的研究来充分了解GPC中废物衍生活化剂的环境影响和长期性能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Silicon
Silicon CHEMISTRY, PHYSICAL-MATERIALS SCIENCE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
20.60%
发文量
685
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The journal Silicon is intended to serve all those involved in studying the role of silicon as an enabling element in materials science. There are no restrictions on disciplinary boundaries provided the focus is on silicon-based materials or adds significantly to the understanding of such materials. Accordingly, such contributions are welcome in the areas of inorganic and organic chemistry, physics, biology, engineering, nanoscience, environmental science, electronics and optoelectronics, and modeling and theory. Relevant silicon-based materials include, but are not limited to, semiconductors, polymers, composites, ceramics, glasses, coatings, resins, composites, small molecules, and thin films.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书