Measured Energy Consumption for AI-Based Precoding

IF 6.6 Q1 ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC
IEEE Open Journal of Vehicular Technology Pub Date : 2026-01-01 Epub Date: 2026-03-12 DOI:10.1109/OJVT.2026.3692717
Pengyu Cong;Chenyang Yang;Shengqian Han;Nan Li;Qi Sun
{"title":"Measured Energy Consumption for AI-Based Precoding","authors":"Pengyu Cong;Chenyang Yang;Shengqian Han;Nan Li;Qi Sun","doi":"10.1109/OJVT.2026.3692717","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper presents the first measurement-based study on the energy consumption of artificial intelligence (AI) algorithms for radio access networks (RAN), aiming to investigate whether the integration of AI leads to higher energy consumption than traditional non-AI algorithms. We use the multiuser precoding problem as a representative example, where AI is widely recognized for its potential in supporting the growing deployment of antennas for 6G systems. Our assessment examines three AI algorithms using the convolutional neural network (CNN), edge graph neural network (EGNN), and communication model-based graph neural network (MGNN), in comparison with two non-AI algorithms, the weighted minimum mean square error (WMMSE) and regularized zero-forcing (RZF) algorithms. Through extensive measurements of energy and power consumption, we examine how efficient architecture designs of deep neural networks (DNNs) affect energy consumptions, and provide a quantitative comparison between measured results and estimates from existing power estimation models. The results indicate that the MGNN, which is the most efficient architecture among the three DNNs, consumes substantially less energy than the non-AI algorithms for large-scale systems, while the CNN consumes significantly more energy for both training and inference compared to the MGNN and EGNN. Moreover, GPUs do not always consume more power than CPUs; the power consumption of CPUs should be taken into account when GPUs are used, and DRAM contributes little to total power consumption. We demonstrate the shortcomings of existing utilization-based and FLOPs-based models in estimating energy consumption, highlighting the need for more accurate models to support green AI designs for RAN.","PeriodicalId":34270,"journal":{"name":"IEEE Open Journal of Vehicular Technology","volume":"7 ","pages":"1559-1575"},"PeriodicalIF":6.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/stamp/stamp.jsp?tp=&arnumber=11516189","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IEEE Open Journal of Vehicular Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/11516189/","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/3/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper presents the first measurement-based study on the energy consumption of artificial intelligence (AI) algorithms for radio access networks (RAN), aiming to investigate whether the integration of AI leads to higher energy consumption than traditional non-AI algorithms. We use the multiuser precoding problem as a representative example, where AI is widely recognized for its potential in supporting the growing deployment of antennas for 6G systems. Our assessment examines three AI algorithms using the convolutional neural network (CNN), edge graph neural network (EGNN), and communication model-based graph neural network (MGNN), in comparison with two non-AI algorithms, the weighted minimum mean square error (WMMSE) and regularized zero-forcing (RZF) algorithms. Through extensive measurements of energy and power consumption, we examine how efficient architecture designs of deep neural networks (DNNs) affect energy consumptions, and provide a quantitative comparison between measured results and estimates from existing power estimation models. The results indicate that the MGNN, which is the most efficient architecture among the three DNNs, consumes substantially less energy than the non-AI algorithms for large-scale systems, while the CNN consumes significantly more energy for both training and inference compared to the MGNN and EGNN. Moreover, GPUs do not always consume more power than CPUs; the power consumption of CPUs should be taken into account when GPUs are used, and DRAM contributes little to total power consumption. We demonstrate the shortcomings of existing utilization-based and FLOPs-based models in estimating energy consumption, highlighting the need for more accurate models to support green AI designs for RAN.
基于人工智能的预编码的实测能耗
本文首次对无线接入网(RAN)中人工智能(AI)算法的能耗进行了基于测量的研究,旨在研究AI的集成是否会导致比传统非AI算法更高的能耗。我们使用多用户预编码问题作为代表性示例,其中人工智能因其在支持6G系统不断增长的天线部署方面的潜力而得到广泛认可。我们的评估研究了使用卷积神经网络(CNN)、边缘图神经网络(EGNN)和基于通信模型的图神经网络(MGNN)的三种人工智能算法,并与两种非人工智能算法(加权最小均方误差(WMMSE)和正则化零强迫(RZF)算法进行了比较。通过对能源和功耗的广泛测量,我们研究了深度神经网络(dnn)的高效架构设计如何影响能耗,并在测量结果和现有功率估计模型的估计之间提供了定量比较。结果表明,MGNN是三种dnn中效率最高的架构,在大规模系统中比非ai算法消耗的能量少得多,而CNN在训练和推理方面消耗的能量明显高于MGNN和EGNN。此外,gpu并不总是比cpu消耗更多的功率;使用gpu时要考虑cpu的功耗,而DRAM对总功耗的贡献很小。我们展示了现有的基于利用率和基于flops的模型在估计能耗方面的缺点,强调需要更准确的模型来支持RAN的绿色人工智能设计。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
25
审稿时长
10 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书