Seref Coser, Bekir Aras, Ali Yasin Ozercan, Baki Numan Ozkaynak, Okan Alkis, Serdar Basboga, Ibrahim Guven Kartal, Halil Ibrahim Ivelik
{"title":"Navigating Accuracy and Clarity in Patient Education: The Role of AI Chatbots in Communicating Testicular Prosthesis Information.","authors":"Seref Coser, Bekir Aras, Ali Yasin Ozercan, Baki Numan Ozkaynak, Okan Alkis, Serdar Basboga, Ibrahim Guven Kartal, Halil Ibrahim Ivelik","doi":"10.56434/j.arch.esp.urol.20267905.97","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study investigated the quality and comprehensibility of responses generated by four different artificial intelligence (AI)-powered chatbots (ChatGPT, Gemini, DeepSeek, and Grok) when queried about testicular prostheses.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A Google search using the keyword \"testicular prosthesis\" was conducted, and the 50 most frequently asked questions listed in the \"People Also Ask\" section were identified. These questions were categorized into preoperative, perioperative, and postoperative topics and were posed to four AI chatbots: ChatGPT, Google Gemini, DeepSeek, and Grok. The responses were independently evaluated by four urologists using the Global Quality Scale (GQS), Modified DISCERN, and Patient Education Materials Assessment Tool for Printed Materials (PEMAT-P) scales to assess quality, reliability, and readability.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>According to the GQS evaluation, the median scores for ChatGPT, Gemini, DeepSeek, and Grok were 4.75, 4.5, 4.75 and 4.875, respectively (<i>p</i> < 0.001). According to the Modified DISCERN scale, the scores were 2.75, 3.0, 3.75 and 3.0, respectively. The PEMAT-P understandability scores were 79.1%, 75.0%, 84.2% and 78.6%, respectively (<i>p</i> < 0.001). Similarly, the PEMAT-P actionability scores were 73.5%, 68.5%, 78.9% and 73.2%, respectively (<i>p</i> < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>While all chatbots provided high-quality responses, their reliability was moderate. DeepSeek demonstrated the best performance across the evaluated metrics. These findings suggest that AI chatbots may serve as useful supplementary tools for patient education regarding testicular prostheses.</p>","PeriodicalId":48852,"journal":{"name":"Archivos Espanoles De Urologia","volume":"79 5","pages":"831-836"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archivos Espanoles De Urologia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.56434/j.arch.esp.urol.20267905.97","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: This study investigated the quality and comprehensibility of responses generated by four different artificial intelligence (AI)-powered chatbots (ChatGPT, Gemini, DeepSeek, and Grok) when queried about testicular prostheses.
Methods: A Google search using the keyword "testicular prosthesis" was conducted, and the 50 most frequently asked questions listed in the "People Also Ask" section were identified. These questions were categorized into preoperative, perioperative, and postoperative topics and were posed to four AI chatbots: ChatGPT, Google Gemini, DeepSeek, and Grok. The responses were independently evaluated by four urologists using the Global Quality Scale (GQS), Modified DISCERN, and Patient Education Materials Assessment Tool for Printed Materials (PEMAT-P) scales to assess quality, reliability, and readability.
Results: According to the GQS evaluation, the median scores for ChatGPT, Gemini, DeepSeek, and Grok were 4.75, 4.5, 4.75 and 4.875, respectively (p < 0.001). According to the Modified DISCERN scale, the scores were 2.75, 3.0, 3.75 and 3.0, respectively. The PEMAT-P understandability scores were 79.1%, 75.0%, 84.2% and 78.6%, respectively (p < 0.001). Similarly, the PEMAT-P actionability scores were 73.5%, 68.5%, 78.9% and 73.2%, respectively (p < 0.001).
Conclusions: While all chatbots provided high-quality responses, their reliability was moderate. DeepSeek demonstrated the best performance across the evaluated metrics. These findings suggest that AI chatbots may serve as useful supplementary tools for patient education regarding testicular prostheses.
期刊介绍:
Archivos Españoles de Urología published since 1944, is an international peer review, susbscription Journal on Urology with original and review articles on different subjets in Urology: oncology, endourology, laparoscopic, andrology, lithiasis, pediatrics , urodynamics,... Case Report are also admitted.