Evaluation of exposure to asbestos from the cutting of cement pipe with a powered saw.

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q4 TOXICOLOGY
Inhalation Toxicology Pub Date : 2026-09-01 Epub Date: 2026-07-12 DOI:10.1080/08958378.2026.2697434
Quincy Perry, Karmen Kissell, Dennis Paustenbach
{"title":"Evaluation of exposure to asbestos from the cutting of cement pipe with a powered saw.","authors":"Quincy Perry, Karmen Kissell, Dennis Paustenbach","doi":"10.1080/08958378.2026.2697434","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study characterized occupational asbestos exposure during the cutting of asbestos-containing cement (A/C) pipe using a gas-powered abrasive saw. Seven pipe sections (25% chrysotile, 10% crocidolite) were cut during two scenarios: above ground and within a shored trench.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Airborne fiber concentrations were quantified by phase contrast microscopy (PCM) and transmission electron microscopy (TEM), with TEM results converted to PCM-equivalent (PCME) concentrations. Mean 30-minute PCME concentrations were 0.81 f/cc during above-ground operations and 10.55 f/cc during in-trench cutting.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eight-hour time-weighted averages (TWAs) and cumulative lifetime exposures were estimated assuming one eight-minute cutting event per week over a 45-year career. Above-ground cutting yielded eight-hour TWAs of 0.010 f/cc (chrysotile) and 0.004 f/cc (crocidolite); in-trench cutting produced 0.16 and 0.021 f/cc, respectively.</p><p><strong>Discussion and conclusions: </strong>All calculated TWAs were well below contemporaneous OSHA permissible exposure limits of 2 f/cc and higher. Estimated cumulative exposures were 0.061 f/cc-years (chrysotile) and 0.023 f/cc-years (crocidolite) for above-ground cutting, and 0.98 f/cc-years (chrysotile) and 0.13 f/cc-years (crocidolite) for trench conditions. These doses were below published no-observed-adverse-effect levels (NOAELs) for both fiber types. Chrysotile exposures were substantially lower than reported NOAEL ranges (100-300 f/cc-years), while crocidolite exposures approached but did not exceed estimated acceptable levels of exposure as derived from epidemiology studies (0.3-0.8 f/cc-years). Although abrasive saw use represents a worst-case scenario, findings indicate that historical occupational risks associated with A/C pipe cutting for the vast majority of workers were overestimated, particularly where manual methods for cutting or exposure controls were implemented.</p>","PeriodicalId":13561,"journal":{"name":"Inhalation Toxicology","volume":" ","pages":"455-468"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Inhalation Toxicology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/08958378.2026.2697434","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/7/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"TOXICOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: This study characterized occupational asbestos exposure during the cutting of asbestos-containing cement (A/C) pipe using a gas-powered abrasive saw. Seven pipe sections (25% chrysotile, 10% crocidolite) were cut during two scenarios: above ground and within a shored trench.

Materials and methods: Airborne fiber concentrations were quantified by phase contrast microscopy (PCM) and transmission electron microscopy (TEM), with TEM results converted to PCM-equivalent (PCME) concentrations. Mean 30-minute PCME concentrations were 0.81 f/cc during above-ground operations and 10.55 f/cc during in-trench cutting.

Results: Eight-hour time-weighted averages (TWAs) and cumulative lifetime exposures were estimated assuming one eight-minute cutting event per week over a 45-year career. Above-ground cutting yielded eight-hour TWAs of 0.010 f/cc (chrysotile) and 0.004 f/cc (crocidolite); in-trench cutting produced 0.16 and 0.021 f/cc, respectively.

Discussion and conclusions: All calculated TWAs were well below contemporaneous OSHA permissible exposure limits of 2 f/cc and higher. Estimated cumulative exposures were 0.061 f/cc-years (chrysotile) and 0.023 f/cc-years (crocidolite) for above-ground cutting, and 0.98 f/cc-years (chrysotile) and 0.13 f/cc-years (crocidolite) for trench conditions. These doses were below published no-observed-adverse-effect levels (NOAELs) for both fiber types. Chrysotile exposures were substantially lower than reported NOAEL ranges (100-300 f/cc-years), while crocidolite exposures approached but did not exceed estimated acceptable levels of exposure as derived from epidemiology studies (0.3-0.8 f/cc-years). Although abrasive saw use represents a worst-case scenario, findings indicate that historical occupational risks associated with A/C pipe cutting for the vast majority of workers were overestimated, particularly where manual methods for cutting or exposure controls were implemented.

电锯切割水泥管时石棉暴露的评估。
目的:本研究描述了使用气动力磨料锯切割含石棉水泥(A/C)管道时职业性石棉暴露。七段管道(25%温石棉,10%青橄榄石)在地面和岸边沟内两种情况下被切割。材料和方法:通过相对比显微镜(PCM)和透射电镜(TEM)对空气中纤维浓度进行定量,并将TEM结果转换为PCM当量(PCME)浓度。在地面作业期间,平均30分钟PCME浓度为0.81 f/cc,在沟内切割期间为10.55 f/cc。结果:假设在45年的职业生涯中每周发生一次8分钟的切割事件,估计8小时时间加权平均(TWAs)和累积终身暴露。地上切割的8小时TWAs分别为0.010 f/cc(温石棉)和0.004 f/cc(青泥石);槽内切削分别产生0.16和0.021 f/cc。讨论和结论:所有计算的twa都远低于OSHA允许的2 f/cc或更高的暴露限值。地面采伐的估计累积暴露量分别为0.061 f/cc-年(温石棉)和0.023 f/cc-年(青石棉),海沟条件下的估计累积暴露量分别为0.98 f/cc-年(温石棉)和0.13 f/cc-年(青石棉)。这两种纤维的剂量均低于已公布的未观察到的不良反应水平(NOAELs)。温石棉暴露大大低于报告的NOAEL范围(100-300℉/cc-年),而青石棉暴露接近但未超过流行病学研究得出的可接受暴露水平(0.3-0.8℉/cc-年)。尽管磨料锯的使用代表了最坏的情况,但研究结果表明,对于绝大多数工人来说,与空调管道切割相关的历史职业风险被高估了,特别是在采用手动切割方法或暴露控制的情况下。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Inhalation Toxicology
Inhalation Toxicology 医学-毒理学
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
4.80%
发文量
38
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Inhalation Toxicology is a peer-reviewed publication providing a key forum for the latest accomplishments and advancements in concepts, approaches, and procedures presently being used to evaluate the health risk associated with airborne chemicals. The journal publishes original research, reviews, symposia, and workshop topics involving the respiratory system’s functions in health and disease, the pathogenesis and mechanism of injury, the extrapolation of animal data to humans, the effects of inhaled substances on extra-pulmonary systems, as well as reliable and innovative models for predicting human disease.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书