Strengthening the Peer Recovery Workforce: Recommendations in Response to the Office of National Drug Control Policy's Priorities.

IF 2.4
Substance use & addiction journal Pub Date : 2026-10-01 Epub Date: 2026-07-10 DOI:10.1177/29767342261461474
Justin S Bell, Anna Unnerstall, Jon Soske, Dennis P Watson, William L White
{"title":"Strengthening the Peer Recovery Workforce: Recommendations in Response to the Office of National Drug Control Policy's Priorities.","authors":"Justin S Bell, Anna Unnerstall, Jon Soske, Dennis P Watson, William L White","doi":"10.1177/29767342261461474","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The expansion of peer recovery support services has not only rapidly integrated peers across service systems but also threatens to drift peer roles toward clinical duties and erode values that gave rise to the peer support movement. The earliest peer professional roles emerged from social advocacy efforts that rejected clinical, hierarchical, and coercive models of care, instead advancing nonclinical, mutual, and person-centered recovery support. As the U.S. Office of National Drug Control Policy calls to strengthen the peer workforce, it offers an opportunity to revisit the social movements that built peer support, clarify why these founding values were considered essential, and use these principles to guide contemporary policy and funding decisions. In this commentary, we provide historical context for the intention of professional peer support roles and articulate how federal and state policy can resist the force of role drift by grounding future workforce development in the movement's original values.</p>","PeriodicalId":516535,"journal":{"name":"Substance use & addiction journal","volume":" ","pages":"982-989"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Substance use & addiction journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/29767342261461474","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/7/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The expansion of peer recovery support services has not only rapidly integrated peers across service systems but also threatens to drift peer roles toward clinical duties and erode values that gave rise to the peer support movement. The earliest peer professional roles emerged from social advocacy efforts that rejected clinical, hierarchical, and coercive models of care, instead advancing nonclinical, mutual, and person-centered recovery support. As the U.S. Office of National Drug Control Policy calls to strengthen the peer workforce, it offers an opportunity to revisit the social movements that built peer support, clarify why these founding values were considered essential, and use these principles to guide contemporary policy and funding decisions. In this commentary, we provide historical context for the intention of professional peer support roles and articulate how federal and state policy can resist the force of role drift by grounding future workforce development in the movement's original values.

加强同伴康复工作队伍:响应国家药物管制政策优先事项办公室的建议。
同伴康复支持服务的扩展不仅迅速整合了服务系统中的同伴,而且还威胁到同伴角色向临床职责的转移,并侵蚀了引起同伴支持运动的价值观。最早的同伴专业角色出现在社会倡导活动中,反对临床的、等级的和强制性的护理模式,取而代之的是推进非临床的、相互的、以人为本的康复支持。正如美国国家药物控制政策办公室呼吁加强同伴劳动力,它提供了一个机会来重新审视建立同伴支持的社会运动,澄清为什么这些创始价值观被认为是必不可少的,并使用这些原则来指导当代的政策和资金决策。在这篇评论中,我们为专业同伴支持角色的意图提供了历史背景,并阐明了联邦和州的政策如何通过将未来的劳动力发展根植于该运动的原始价值观来抵制角色漂移的力量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书