Cytotoxicity Assessment and Indentation Size Effect of Low-Cost Experimental Implant Alloys

IF 9.1 Q2 CHEMISTRY, PHYSICAL
ACS Materials Au Pub Date : 2026-07-08 Epub Date: 2026-04-09 DOI:10.1021/acsmaterialsau.6c00008
Nompumelelo V. Nkosi, Divesha Essa, Amogelang C. Moalodi, Johnson Lawal, Yahya Choonara, Desmond Klenam, Michael O. Bodunrin
{"title":"Cytotoxicity Assessment and Indentation Size Effect of Low-Cost Experimental Implant Alloys","authors":"Nompumelelo V. Nkosi,&nbsp;Divesha Essa,&nbsp;Amogelang C. Moalodi,&nbsp;Johnson Lawal,&nbsp;Yahya Choonara,&nbsp;Desmond Klenam,&nbsp;Michael O. Bodunrin","doi":"10.1021/acsmaterialsau.6c00008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The development of\r\naffordable lightweight alloys with\r\na combination\r\nof high mechanical strength and excellent biocompatibility is crucial\r\nfor next-generation biomedical implants, particularly for middle-\r\nand low-income classes. This study investigates the relationship between\r\nprocessing, microscale mechanical behavior, and cytotoxicity of experimental\r\ntitanium alloys (Ti-3Fe, Ti-4.5Al-1 V-3Fe, and Ti-6Al-1 V-3Fe) and\r\na low-density stainless-steel (LDSS) alloy (Fe-20Mn-7Al-1C-3Cr-3Cu-3Mo),\r\nproduced via casting and sintering. Their performance was benchmarked\r\nagainst those of commercial Ti-6Al-4 V and 316L stainless steel. Micro-\r\nand macro-indentation tests were conducted to evaluate the indentation\r\nsize effect (ISE), and the Nix–Gao model was applied to quantify\r\nstrain-gradient plasticity through the estimation of statistically\r\nstored dislocation (SSD) and geometrically necessary dislocation (GND)\r\ndensities. In parallel, in vitro cytotoxicity was evaluated using\r\nNIH-3T3 fibroblast cells following the ISO 10993-5 guidelines. The\r\nexperimental titanium alloys exhibited pronounced ISE behavior and\r\nthe highest GND densities, indicating enhanced resistance to plastic\r\ndeformation at the microscale compared to the LDSS alloys. Cytotoxicity\r\nresults showed excellent biocompatibility for Ti-6Al-4 V and 316L\r\nand good compatibility for the experimental Ti–Fe alloys, with\r\ncell viability exceeding 70% at 100% extract concentration. In contrast,\r\nthe LDSS alloys showed the lowest cell viability, with both the as-cast\r\nand sintered LDSS having a cell viability of less than 70%, thereby\r\nnecessitating a detailed corrosion performance evaluation and further\r\noptimization. This performance was correlated with high Mn dissolution\r\ndetected in the extract medium after the cytotoxicity assessment.\r\nThe results demonstrate that experimental titanium alloys provide\r\na promising pathway toward lightweight biomedical implant materials\r\nthat combine microscale strengthening with acceptable biocompatibility.</p>","PeriodicalId":29798,"journal":{"name":"ACS Materials Au","volume":"6 4","pages":"808–819"},"PeriodicalIF":9.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Materials Au","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acsmaterialsau.6c00008","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/4/9 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, PHYSICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The development of affordable lightweight alloys with a combination of high mechanical strength and excellent biocompatibility is crucial for next-generation biomedical implants, particularly for middle- and low-income classes. This study investigates the relationship between processing, microscale mechanical behavior, and cytotoxicity of experimental titanium alloys (Ti-3Fe, Ti-4.5Al-1 V-3Fe, and Ti-6Al-1 V-3Fe) and a low-density stainless-steel (LDSS) alloy (Fe-20Mn-7Al-1C-3Cr-3Cu-3Mo), produced via casting and sintering. Their performance was benchmarked against those of commercial Ti-6Al-4 V and 316L stainless steel. Micro- and macro-indentation tests were conducted to evaluate the indentation size effect (ISE), and the Nix–Gao model was applied to quantify strain-gradient plasticity through the estimation of statistically stored dislocation (SSD) and geometrically necessary dislocation (GND) densities. In parallel, in vitro cytotoxicity was evaluated using NIH-3T3 fibroblast cells following the ISO 10993-5 guidelines. The experimental titanium alloys exhibited pronounced ISE behavior and the highest GND densities, indicating enhanced resistance to plastic deformation at the microscale compared to the LDSS alloys. Cytotoxicity results showed excellent biocompatibility for Ti-6Al-4 V and 316L and good compatibility for the experimental Ti–Fe alloys, with cell viability exceeding 70% at 100% extract concentration. In contrast, the LDSS alloys showed the lowest cell viability, with both the as-cast and sintered LDSS having a cell viability of less than 70%, thereby necessitating a detailed corrosion performance evaluation and further optimization. This performance was correlated with high Mn dissolution detected in the extract medium after the cytotoxicity assessment. The results demonstrate that experimental titanium alloys provide a promising pathway toward lightweight biomedical implant materials that combine microscale strengthening with acceptable biocompatibility.

低成本实验植入合金的细胞毒性评估及压痕尺寸效应。
开发负担得起的轻质合金,结合高机械强度和优异的生物相容性,对于下一代生物医学植入物至关重要,特别是对于中低收入阶层。本研究研究了实验钛合金(Ti-3Fe、Ti-4.5Al-1 V-3Fe和Ti-6Al-1 V-3Fe)和低密度不锈钢(LDSS)合金(Fe-20Mn-7Al-1C-3Cr-3Cu-3Mo)的加工、微观力学行为和细胞毒性之间的关系。它们的性能以商用ti - 6al - 4v和316L不锈钢为基准。通过微观和宏观压痕试验来评估压痕尺寸效应(ISE),并应用Nix-Gao模型通过估计统计存储位错(SSD)和几何必要位错(GND)密度来量化应变梯度塑性。同时,根据ISO 10993-5指南,使用NIH-3T3成纤维细胞评估体外细胞毒性。实验钛合金表现出明显的ISE行为和最高的GND密度,表明与LDSS合金相比,在微尺度上具有更强的抗塑性变形能力。细胞毒性实验结果表明,该提取物对ti - 6al - 4v和316L具有良好的生物相容性,对实验用Ti-Fe合金具有良好的相容性,在100%提取物浓度下,细胞存活率超过70%。相比之下,LDSS合金的细胞活力最低,铸态和烧结态LDSS的细胞活力均低于70%,因此需要详细的腐蚀性能评估和进一步优化。这种性能与细胞毒性评估后提取液中检测到的高Mn溶解有关。结果表明,实验钛合金为轻量化生物医学植入材料提供了一条有希望的途径,该材料结合了微尺度强化和可接受的生物相容性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
ACS Materials Au
ACS Materials Au 材料科学-
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: ACS Materials Au is an open access journal publishing letters articles reviews and perspectives describing high-quality research at the forefront of fundamental and applied research and at the interface between materials and other disciplines such as chemistry engineering and biology. Papers that showcase multidisciplinary and innovative materials research addressing global challenges are especially welcome. Areas of interest include but are not limited to:Design synthesis characterization and evaluation of forefront and emerging materialsUnderstanding structure property performance relationships and their underlying mechanismsDevelopment of materials for energy environmental biomedical electronic and catalytic applications
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书