Reproducibility and Validation Challenges in AI-Driven Scaffold Design for Bone Regeneration.

IF 4.3 2区 医学 Q2 CELL & TISSUE ENGINEERING
Mohammadamin Damsaz, Farnaz Heidari Laybidi, Zohreh Moradipour, Hossein Sobhani, Niloufar Shavali, Mohammad Mahdi Rezaei Nayeh, Elham Gholami, Amirmohammad Dolatabadi, Amir Raee, Mohammad Hosseini Hooshiar
{"title":"Reproducibility and Validation Challenges in AI-Driven Scaffold Design for Bone Regeneration.","authors":"Mohammadamin Damsaz, Farnaz Heidari Laybidi, Zohreh Moradipour, Hossein Sobhani, Niloufar Shavali, Mohammad Mahdi Rezaei Nayeh, Elham Gholami, Amirmohammad Dolatabadi, Amir Raee, Mohammad Hosseini Hooshiar","doi":"10.1177/19373368261467436","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Artificial intelligence (AI) is increasingly applied to bioink formulation and bioprinting process control in tissue engineering (TE). Yet, translational progress remains constrained by small datasets, limited cross-platform validation, and weak links between computational predictions and biological outcomes. This review critically evaluates experimentally validated AI applications across scaffold-based bone regeneration, spanning materials design, fabrication control, and biological assessment. Physics-informed models are often more robust and generalizable than purely data-driven approaches, whereas transfer learning remains challenging due to variability in cellular responses and fabrication conditions. To address gaps in existing reporting standards, to address gaps in current reporting recommendations, we propose the AI-TE reporting framework, incorporating TE-specific requirements for biological validation, fabrication documentation, and translational readiness. Impact StatementDespite the rapid growth of AI-driven scaffold design for bone regeneration, reproducibility, and validation remain insufficiently addressed across current studies. This review identifies key methodological gaps and synthesizes practical validation and reporting priorities to improve reliability and translational relevance.</p>","PeriodicalId":23134,"journal":{"name":"Tissue Engineering. Part B, Reviews","volume":" ","pages":"19373368261467436"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tissue Engineering. Part B, Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/19373368261467436","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CELL & TISSUE ENGINEERING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI) is increasingly applied to bioink formulation and bioprinting process control in tissue engineering (TE). Yet, translational progress remains constrained by small datasets, limited cross-platform validation, and weak links between computational predictions and biological outcomes. This review critically evaluates experimentally validated AI applications across scaffold-based bone regeneration, spanning materials design, fabrication control, and biological assessment. Physics-informed models are often more robust and generalizable than purely data-driven approaches, whereas transfer learning remains challenging due to variability in cellular responses and fabrication conditions. To address gaps in existing reporting standards, to address gaps in current reporting recommendations, we propose the AI-TE reporting framework, incorporating TE-specific requirements for biological validation, fabrication documentation, and translational readiness. Impact StatementDespite the rapid growth of AI-driven scaffold design for bone regeneration, reproducibility, and validation remain insufficiently addressed across current studies. This review identifies key methodological gaps and synthesizes practical validation and reporting priorities to improve reliability and translational relevance.

人工智能驱动骨再生支架设计的可重复性和验证性挑战。
人工智能(AI)越来越多地应用于组织工程(TE)中的生物墨水配方和生物打印过程控制。然而,翻译的进展仍然受到小数据集、有限的跨平台验证以及计算预测与生物学结果之间薄弱联系的限制。本文对人工智能在基于支架的骨再生、跨越材料设计、制造控制和生物评估方面的应用进行了批判性评估。基于物理的模型通常比纯数据驱动的方法更健壮、更一般化,而由于细胞响应和制造条件的可变性,迁移学习仍然具有挑战性。为了解决现有报告标准中的差距,为了解决当前报告建议中的差距,我们提出了AI-TE报告框架,其中纳入了te对生物验证、制造文件和转化准备的特定要求。尽管人工智能驱动的骨再生支架设计快速发展,但目前的研究仍未充分解决可重复性和有效性问题。本综述确定了关键的方法差距,并综合了实际验证和报告的优先事项,以提高可靠性和翻译相关性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Tissue Engineering. Part B, Reviews
Tissue Engineering. Part B, Reviews Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology-Biochemistry
CiteScore
12.80
自引率
1.60%
发文量
150
期刊介绍: Tissue Engineering Reviews (Part B) meets the urgent need for high-quality review articles by presenting critical literature overviews and systematic summaries of research within the field to assess the current standing and future directions within relevant areas and technologies. Part B publishes bi-monthly.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书